Cargando…

Composting of Olive Mill Pomace, Agro-Industrial Sewage Sludge and Other Residues: Process Monitoring and Agronomic Use of the Resulting Composts

The viability of co-composting of olive mill pomace added to sewage sludge with other organic residues was evaluated and the agronomic use of the final composts was investigated. Two composting piles at different carbon-nitrogen ratios were performed, in which olive mill pomace (OMP), sewage sludge...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leone, Alessandro, Romaniello, Roberto, Tamborrino, Antonia, Beneduce, Luciano, Gagliardi, Anna, Giuliani, Marcella, Gatta, Giuseppe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8468776/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34574250
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10092143
_version_ 1784573758087888896
author Leone, Alessandro
Romaniello, Roberto
Tamborrino, Antonia
Beneduce, Luciano
Gagliardi, Anna
Giuliani, Marcella
Gatta, Giuseppe
author_facet Leone, Alessandro
Romaniello, Roberto
Tamborrino, Antonia
Beneduce, Luciano
Gagliardi, Anna
Giuliani, Marcella
Gatta, Giuseppe
author_sort Leone, Alessandro
collection PubMed
description The viability of co-composting of olive mill pomace added to sewage sludge with other organic residues was evaluated and the agronomic use of the final composts was investigated. Two composting piles at different carbon-nitrogen ratios were performed, in which olive mill pomace (OMP), sewage sludge from vegetable processing (SS), fresh residues from artichoke processing residues (AR), and wheat straw (WS) were used. The two composting piles were placed inside a specially built greenhouse and a turning machine pulled by a tractor was used for turning and shredding the organic matrix (every 6 days) during the process. The humidity and temperature of organic matrices have been monitored and controlled during the entire composting process, which lasted 90 days. The process was also monitored to evaluate the microbiological safety of the final compost. The humidity of both piles was always kept just above 50% until the end of the thermophilic phase and the maximum temperature was about 50 °C during the thermophilic phase. The carbon-nitrogen ratio decreased from 21.4 and 28.2, respectively (initial value at day 1 in Pile A and B), to values ranging from 12.9 to 15.1, both composts that originated from the two different piles were microbiologically safe. During a two-year period, the effects of different types of compost on the main qualitative parameters of processing tomato and durum wheat was evaluated. Five fertilization treatments were evaluated for tomato and durum wheat crops: unfertilized control (TR(1)); compost A (TR(2)); compost B (TR(3)); ½ mineral and ½ compost A (TR(4)); and mineral fertilizer commonly used for the two crops (TR(5)). Concerning the processing tomato yield, TR(5) and TR(4) showed the best results (2.73 and 2.51 kg, respectively). The same trend was observed considering the marketable yield per plant. The only difference was related to the treatments that included the compost (2.32, 1.77, and 1.73 kg/plant for TR(4), TR(3), and TR(2), respectively). As regards the qualitative parameters of tomato, the highest average weight of the fruits was found in the TR(5), TR(4), and TR(3) treatments (respectively, 73.67 g, 70.34 g, and 68.10 g). For durum wheat, only the protein component was differentiated between treatments. Furthermore, wheat grain yield parameters generally increased by combined application of mineral fertilizer and compost.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8468776
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84687762021-09-27 Composting of Olive Mill Pomace, Agro-Industrial Sewage Sludge and Other Residues: Process Monitoring and Agronomic Use of the Resulting Composts Leone, Alessandro Romaniello, Roberto Tamborrino, Antonia Beneduce, Luciano Gagliardi, Anna Giuliani, Marcella Gatta, Giuseppe Foods Article The viability of co-composting of olive mill pomace added to sewage sludge with other organic residues was evaluated and the agronomic use of the final composts was investigated. Two composting piles at different carbon-nitrogen ratios were performed, in which olive mill pomace (OMP), sewage sludge from vegetable processing (SS), fresh residues from artichoke processing residues (AR), and wheat straw (WS) were used. The two composting piles were placed inside a specially built greenhouse and a turning machine pulled by a tractor was used for turning and shredding the organic matrix (every 6 days) during the process. The humidity and temperature of organic matrices have been monitored and controlled during the entire composting process, which lasted 90 days. The process was also monitored to evaluate the microbiological safety of the final compost. The humidity of both piles was always kept just above 50% until the end of the thermophilic phase and the maximum temperature was about 50 °C during the thermophilic phase. The carbon-nitrogen ratio decreased from 21.4 and 28.2, respectively (initial value at day 1 in Pile A and B), to values ranging from 12.9 to 15.1, both composts that originated from the two different piles were microbiologically safe. During a two-year period, the effects of different types of compost on the main qualitative parameters of processing tomato and durum wheat was evaluated. Five fertilization treatments were evaluated for tomato and durum wheat crops: unfertilized control (TR(1)); compost A (TR(2)); compost B (TR(3)); ½ mineral and ½ compost A (TR(4)); and mineral fertilizer commonly used for the two crops (TR(5)). Concerning the processing tomato yield, TR(5) and TR(4) showed the best results (2.73 and 2.51 kg, respectively). The same trend was observed considering the marketable yield per plant. The only difference was related to the treatments that included the compost (2.32, 1.77, and 1.73 kg/plant for TR(4), TR(3), and TR(2), respectively). As regards the qualitative parameters of tomato, the highest average weight of the fruits was found in the TR(5), TR(4), and TR(3) treatments (respectively, 73.67 g, 70.34 g, and 68.10 g). For durum wheat, only the protein component was differentiated between treatments. Furthermore, wheat grain yield parameters generally increased by combined application of mineral fertilizer and compost. MDPI 2021-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8468776/ /pubmed/34574250 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10092143 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Leone, Alessandro
Romaniello, Roberto
Tamborrino, Antonia
Beneduce, Luciano
Gagliardi, Anna
Giuliani, Marcella
Gatta, Giuseppe
Composting of Olive Mill Pomace, Agro-Industrial Sewage Sludge and Other Residues: Process Monitoring and Agronomic Use of the Resulting Composts
title Composting of Olive Mill Pomace, Agro-Industrial Sewage Sludge and Other Residues: Process Monitoring and Agronomic Use of the Resulting Composts
title_full Composting of Olive Mill Pomace, Agro-Industrial Sewage Sludge and Other Residues: Process Monitoring and Agronomic Use of the Resulting Composts
title_fullStr Composting of Olive Mill Pomace, Agro-Industrial Sewage Sludge and Other Residues: Process Monitoring and Agronomic Use of the Resulting Composts
title_full_unstemmed Composting of Olive Mill Pomace, Agro-Industrial Sewage Sludge and Other Residues: Process Monitoring and Agronomic Use of the Resulting Composts
title_short Composting of Olive Mill Pomace, Agro-Industrial Sewage Sludge and Other Residues: Process Monitoring and Agronomic Use of the Resulting Composts
title_sort composting of olive mill pomace, agro-industrial sewage sludge and other residues: process monitoring and agronomic use of the resulting composts
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8468776/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34574250
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10092143
work_keys_str_mv AT leonealessandro compostingofolivemillpomaceagroindustrialsewagesludgeandotherresiduesprocessmonitoringandagronomicuseoftheresultingcomposts
AT romanielloroberto compostingofolivemillpomaceagroindustrialsewagesludgeandotherresiduesprocessmonitoringandagronomicuseoftheresultingcomposts
AT tamborrinoantonia compostingofolivemillpomaceagroindustrialsewagesludgeandotherresiduesprocessmonitoringandagronomicuseoftheresultingcomposts
AT beneduceluciano compostingofolivemillpomaceagroindustrialsewagesludgeandotherresiduesprocessmonitoringandagronomicuseoftheresultingcomposts
AT gagliardianna compostingofolivemillpomaceagroindustrialsewagesludgeandotherresiduesprocessmonitoringandagronomicuseoftheresultingcomposts
AT giulianimarcella compostingofolivemillpomaceagroindustrialsewagesludgeandotherresiduesprocessmonitoringandagronomicuseoftheresultingcomposts
AT gattagiuseppe compostingofolivemillpomaceagroindustrialsewagesludgeandotherresiduesprocessmonitoringandagronomicuseoftheresultingcomposts