Cargando…

How to Promote the Performance of Parametric Volatility Forecasts in the Stock Market? A Neural Networks Approach

This study uses the fourteen stock indices as the sample and then utilizes eight parametric volatility forecasting models and eight composed volatility forecasting models to explore whether the neural network approach and the settings of leverage effect and non-normal return distribution can promote...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Su, Jung-Bin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8468884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34573776
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e23091151
_version_ 1784573787035926528
author Su, Jung-Bin
author_facet Su, Jung-Bin
author_sort Su, Jung-Bin
collection PubMed
description This study uses the fourteen stock indices as the sample and then utilizes eight parametric volatility forecasting models and eight composed volatility forecasting models to explore whether the neural network approach and the settings of leverage effect and non-normal return distribution can promote the performance of volatility forecasting, and which one of the sixteen models possesses the best volatility forecasting performance. The eight parametric volatility forecasts models are composed of the generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH) or GJR-GARCH volatility specification combining with the normal, Student’s t, skewed Student’s t, and generalized skewed Student’s t distributions. Empirical results show that, the performance for the composed volatility forecasting approach is significantly superior to that for the parametric volatility forecasting approach. Furthermore, the GJR-GARCH volatility specification has better performance than the GARCH one. In addition, the non-normal distribution does not have better forecasting performance than the normal distribution. In addition, the GJR-GARCH model combined with both the normal distribution and a neural network approach has the best performance of volatility forecasting among sixteen models. Thus, a neural network approach significantly promotes the performance of volatility forecasting. On the other hand, the setting of leverage effect can encourage the performance of volatility forecasting whereas the setting of non-normal distribution cannot.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8468884
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84688842021-09-27 How to Promote the Performance of Parametric Volatility Forecasts in the Stock Market? A Neural Networks Approach Su, Jung-Bin Entropy (Basel) Article This study uses the fourteen stock indices as the sample and then utilizes eight parametric volatility forecasting models and eight composed volatility forecasting models to explore whether the neural network approach and the settings of leverage effect and non-normal return distribution can promote the performance of volatility forecasting, and which one of the sixteen models possesses the best volatility forecasting performance. The eight parametric volatility forecasts models are composed of the generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH) or GJR-GARCH volatility specification combining with the normal, Student’s t, skewed Student’s t, and generalized skewed Student’s t distributions. Empirical results show that, the performance for the composed volatility forecasting approach is significantly superior to that for the parametric volatility forecasting approach. Furthermore, the GJR-GARCH volatility specification has better performance than the GARCH one. In addition, the non-normal distribution does not have better forecasting performance than the normal distribution. In addition, the GJR-GARCH model combined with both the normal distribution and a neural network approach has the best performance of volatility forecasting among sixteen models. Thus, a neural network approach significantly promotes the performance of volatility forecasting. On the other hand, the setting of leverage effect can encourage the performance of volatility forecasting whereas the setting of non-normal distribution cannot. MDPI 2021-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8468884/ /pubmed/34573776 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e23091151 Text en © 2021 by the author. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Su, Jung-Bin
How to Promote the Performance of Parametric Volatility Forecasts in the Stock Market? A Neural Networks Approach
title How to Promote the Performance of Parametric Volatility Forecasts in the Stock Market? A Neural Networks Approach
title_full How to Promote the Performance of Parametric Volatility Forecasts in the Stock Market? A Neural Networks Approach
title_fullStr How to Promote the Performance of Parametric Volatility Forecasts in the Stock Market? A Neural Networks Approach
title_full_unstemmed How to Promote the Performance of Parametric Volatility Forecasts in the Stock Market? A Neural Networks Approach
title_short How to Promote the Performance of Parametric Volatility Forecasts in the Stock Market? A Neural Networks Approach
title_sort how to promote the performance of parametric volatility forecasts in the stock market? a neural networks approach
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8468884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34573776
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e23091151
work_keys_str_mv AT sujungbin howtopromotetheperformanceofparametricvolatilityforecastsinthestockmarketaneuralnetworksapproach