Cargando…
How to Promote the Performance of Parametric Volatility Forecasts in the Stock Market? A Neural Networks Approach
This study uses the fourteen stock indices as the sample and then utilizes eight parametric volatility forecasting models and eight composed volatility forecasting models to explore whether the neural network approach and the settings of leverage effect and non-normal return distribution can promote...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8468884/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34573776 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e23091151 |
_version_ | 1784573787035926528 |
---|---|
author | Su, Jung-Bin |
author_facet | Su, Jung-Bin |
author_sort | Su, Jung-Bin |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study uses the fourteen stock indices as the sample and then utilizes eight parametric volatility forecasting models and eight composed volatility forecasting models to explore whether the neural network approach and the settings of leverage effect and non-normal return distribution can promote the performance of volatility forecasting, and which one of the sixteen models possesses the best volatility forecasting performance. The eight parametric volatility forecasts models are composed of the generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH) or GJR-GARCH volatility specification combining with the normal, Student’s t, skewed Student’s t, and generalized skewed Student’s t distributions. Empirical results show that, the performance for the composed volatility forecasting approach is significantly superior to that for the parametric volatility forecasting approach. Furthermore, the GJR-GARCH volatility specification has better performance than the GARCH one. In addition, the non-normal distribution does not have better forecasting performance than the normal distribution. In addition, the GJR-GARCH model combined with both the normal distribution and a neural network approach has the best performance of volatility forecasting among sixteen models. Thus, a neural network approach significantly promotes the performance of volatility forecasting. On the other hand, the setting of leverage effect can encourage the performance of volatility forecasting whereas the setting of non-normal distribution cannot. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8468884 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84688842021-09-27 How to Promote the Performance of Parametric Volatility Forecasts in the Stock Market? A Neural Networks Approach Su, Jung-Bin Entropy (Basel) Article This study uses the fourteen stock indices as the sample and then utilizes eight parametric volatility forecasting models and eight composed volatility forecasting models to explore whether the neural network approach and the settings of leverage effect and non-normal return distribution can promote the performance of volatility forecasting, and which one of the sixteen models possesses the best volatility forecasting performance. The eight parametric volatility forecasts models are composed of the generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH) or GJR-GARCH volatility specification combining with the normal, Student’s t, skewed Student’s t, and generalized skewed Student’s t distributions. Empirical results show that, the performance for the composed volatility forecasting approach is significantly superior to that for the parametric volatility forecasting approach. Furthermore, the GJR-GARCH volatility specification has better performance than the GARCH one. In addition, the non-normal distribution does not have better forecasting performance than the normal distribution. In addition, the GJR-GARCH model combined with both the normal distribution and a neural network approach has the best performance of volatility forecasting among sixteen models. Thus, a neural network approach significantly promotes the performance of volatility forecasting. On the other hand, the setting of leverage effect can encourage the performance of volatility forecasting whereas the setting of non-normal distribution cannot. MDPI 2021-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8468884/ /pubmed/34573776 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e23091151 Text en © 2021 by the author. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Su, Jung-Bin How to Promote the Performance of Parametric Volatility Forecasts in the Stock Market? A Neural Networks Approach |
title | How to Promote the Performance of Parametric Volatility Forecasts in the Stock Market? A Neural Networks Approach |
title_full | How to Promote the Performance of Parametric Volatility Forecasts in the Stock Market? A Neural Networks Approach |
title_fullStr | How to Promote the Performance of Parametric Volatility Forecasts in the Stock Market? A Neural Networks Approach |
title_full_unstemmed | How to Promote the Performance of Parametric Volatility Forecasts in the Stock Market? A Neural Networks Approach |
title_short | How to Promote the Performance of Parametric Volatility Forecasts in the Stock Market? A Neural Networks Approach |
title_sort | how to promote the performance of parametric volatility forecasts in the stock market? a neural networks approach |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8468884/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34573776 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e23091151 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sujungbin howtopromotetheperformanceofparametricvolatilityforecastsinthestockmarketaneuralnetworksapproach |