Cargando…
Animal Assisted Interventions in the Green Care Framework: A Literature Review
Green Care (GC) and Animal Assisted Interventions (AAI) are recognised practices useful to enhance the wellbeing of people through interaction with nature and animals. This study aims at understanding the interconnections between GC and AAI by analysing deeply which interaction with animals is condu...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8468905/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34574355 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18189431 |
_version_ | 1784573792616448000 |
---|---|
author | Galardi, Morgana De Santis, Marta Moruzzo, Roberta Mutinelli, Franco Contalbrigo, Laura |
author_facet | Galardi, Morgana De Santis, Marta Moruzzo, Roberta Mutinelli, Franco Contalbrigo, Laura |
author_sort | Galardi, Morgana |
collection | PubMed |
description | Green Care (GC) and Animal Assisted Interventions (AAI) are recognised practices useful to enhance the wellbeing of people through interaction with nature and animals. This study aims at understanding the interconnections between GC and AAI by analysing deeply which interaction with animals is conducted. Therefore, we carried out a literature search through Web of Science and Google Scholar that allowed retrieval of 993 records; after the PRISMA selection process, 42 were included. Relevant information was extracted: year of publication, geographical location, objectives, settings in agricultural environment, animal species, characteristics of users involved, type of human–animal interaction, coexistence of other activities without animals, animal health and welfare issues. From the review emerged that research on GC with animals is common in high-income countries and that the line between AAI and occupational therapy is often vague. Moreover, the most common setting for these interventions appears to be the farm, and frequently animals involved are not selected according to their ethological characteristics. Users in this context are extremely various and not only involved in activities with animals. Within the included studies, we noted a lack in the consideration of animal welfare that indicates the need for increased awareness among practitioners and a more ethical approach when animals are involved. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8468905 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84689052021-09-27 Animal Assisted Interventions in the Green Care Framework: A Literature Review Galardi, Morgana De Santis, Marta Moruzzo, Roberta Mutinelli, Franco Contalbrigo, Laura Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Green Care (GC) and Animal Assisted Interventions (AAI) are recognised practices useful to enhance the wellbeing of people through interaction with nature and animals. This study aims at understanding the interconnections between GC and AAI by analysing deeply which interaction with animals is conducted. Therefore, we carried out a literature search through Web of Science and Google Scholar that allowed retrieval of 993 records; after the PRISMA selection process, 42 were included. Relevant information was extracted: year of publication, geographical location, objectives, settings in agricultural environment, animal species, characteristics of users involved, type of human–animal interaction, coexistence of other activities without animals, animal health and welfare issues. From the review emerged that research on GC with animals is common in high-income countries and that the line between AAI and occupational therapy is often vague. Moreover, the most common setting for these interventions appears to be the farm, and frequently animals involved are not selected according to their ethological characteristics. Users in this context are extremely various and not only involved in activities with animals. Within the included studies, we noted a lack in the consideration of animal welfare that indicates the need for increased awareness among practitioners and a more ethical approach when animals are involved. MDPI 2021-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8468905/ /pubmed/34574355 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18189431 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Galardi, Morgana De Santis, Marta Moruzzo, Roberta Mutinelli, Franco Contalbrigo, Laura Animal Assisted Interventions in the Green Care Framework: A Literature Review |
title | Animal Assisted Interventions in the Green Care Framework: A Literature Review |
title_full | Animal Assisted Interventions in the Green Care Framework: A Literature Review |
title_fullStr | Animal Assisted Interventions in the Green Care Framework: A Literature Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Animal Assisted Interventions in the Green Care Framework: A Literature Review |
title_short | Animal Assisted Interventions in the Green Care Framework: A Literature Review |
title_sort | animal assisted interventions in the green care framework: a literature review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8468905/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34574355 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18189431 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT galardimorgana animalassistedinterventionsinthegreencareframeworkaliteraturereview AT desantismarta animalassistedinterventionsinthegreencareframeworkaliteraturereview AT moruzzoroberta animalassistedinterventionsinthegreencareframeworkaliteraturereview AT mutinellifranco animalassistedinterventionsinthegreencareframeworkaliteraturereview AT contalbrigolaura animalassistedinterventionsinthegreencareframeworkaliteraturereview |