Cargando…

Reappraisal of PRRS Immune Control Strategies: The Way Forward

The control of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) is still a major issue worldwide in the pig farming sector. Despite extensive research efforts and the practical experience gained so far, the syndrome still severely affects farmed pigs worldwide and challenges established beliefs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amadori, Massimo, Listorti, Valeria, Razzuoli, Elisabetta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8469074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34578106
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10091073
_version_ 1784573837226016768
author Amadori, Massimo
Listorti, Valeria
Razzuoli, Elisabetta
author_facet Amadori, Massimo
Listorti, Valeria
Razzuoli, Elisabetta
author_sort Amadori, Massimo
collection PubMed
description The control of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) is still a major issue worldwide in the pig farming sector. Despite extensive research efforts and the practical experience gained so far, the syndrome still severely affects farmed pigs worldwide and challenges established beliefs in veterinary virology and immunology. The clinical and economic repercussions of PRRS are based on concomitant, additive features of the virus pathogenicity, host susceptibility, and the influence of environmental, microbial, and non-microbial stressors. This makes a case for integrated, multi-disciplinary research efforts, in which the three types of contributing factors are critically evaluated toward the development of successful disease control strategies. These efforts could be significantly eased by the definition of reliable markers of disease risk and virus pathogenicity. As for the host’s susceptibility to PRRSV infection and disease onset, the roles of both the innate and adaptive immune responses are still ill-defined. In particular, the overt discrepancy between passive and active immunity and the uncertain role of adaptive immunity vis-à-vis established PRRSV infection should prompt the scientific community to develop novel research schemes, in which apparently divergent and contradictory findings could be reconciled and eventually brought into a satisfactory conceptual framework.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8469074
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84690742021-09-27 Reappraisal of PRRS Immune Control Strategies: The Way Forward Amadori, Massimo Listorti, Valeria Razzuoli, Elisabetta Pathogens Review The control of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) is still a major issue worldwide in the pig farming sector. Despite extensive research efforts and the practical experience gained so far, the syndrome still severely affects farmed pigs worldwide and challenges established beliefs in veterinary virology and immunology. The clinical and economic repercussions of PRRS are based on concomitant, additive features of the virus pathogenicity, host susceptibility, and the influence of environmental, microbial, and non-microbial stressors. This makes a case for integrated, multi-disciplinary research efforts, in which the three types of contributing factors are critically evaluated toward the development of successful disease control strategies. These efforts could be significantly eased by the definition of reliable markers of disease risk and virus pathogenicity. As for the host’s susceptibility to PRRSV infection and disease onset, the roles of both the innate and adaptive immune responses are still ill-defined. In particular, the overt discrepancy between passive and active immunity and the uncertain role of adaptive immunity vis-à-vis established PRRSV infection should prompt the scientific community to develop novel research schemes, in which apparently divergent and contradictory findings could be reconciled and eventually brought into a satisfactory conceptual framework. MDPI 2021-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8469074/ /pubmed/34578106 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10091073 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Amadori, Massimo
Listorti, Valeria
Razzuoli, Elisabetta
Reappraisal of PRRS Immune Control Strategies: The Way Forward
title Reappraisal of PRRS Immune Control Strategies: The Way Forward
title_full Reappraisal of PRRS Immune Control Strategies: The Way Forward
title_fullStr Reappraisal of PRRS Immune Control Strategies: The Way Forward
title_full_unstemmed Reappraisal of PRRS Immune Control Strategies: The Way Forward
title_short Reappraisal of PRRS Immune Control Strategies: The Way Forward
title_sort reappraisal of prrs immune control strategies: the way forward
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8469074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34578106
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10091073
work_keys_str_mv AT amadorimassimo reappraisalofprrsimmunecontrolstrategiesthewayforward
AT listortivaleria reappraisalofprrsimmunecontrolstrategiesthewayforward
AT razzuolielisabetta reappraisalofprrsimmunecontrolstrategiesthewayforward