Cargando…

How Close Are We toward an Optimal Balance in Safety and Efficacy in Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation? Lessons from the CLOSE Protocol

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common treatment strategy in patients with drug-resistant, symptomatic AF. In patients with paroxysmal and short-standing persistent AF, pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is often enough to prevent recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA). Point-by-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lycke, Michelle, O’Neill, Louisa, Gillis, Kris, Wielandts, Jean-Yves, Le Polain De Waroux, Jean-Benoit, Tavernier, Rene, Knecht, Sebastien, Duytschaever, Mattias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8469113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34575379
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10184268
_version_ 1784573847209508864
author Lycke, Michelle
O’Neill, Louisa
Gillis, Kris
Wielandts, Jean-Yves
Le Polain De Waroux, Jean-Benoit
Tavernier, Rene
Knecht, Sebastien
Duytschaever, Mattias
author_facet Lycke, Michelle
O’Neill, Louisa
Gillis, Kris
Wielandts, Jean-Yves
Le Polain De Waroux, Jean-Benoit
Tavernier, Rene
Knecht, Sebastien
Duytschaever, Mattias
author_sort Lycke, Michelle
collection PubMed
description Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common treatment strategy in patients with drug-resistant, symptomatic AF. In patients with paroxysmal and short-standing persistent AF, pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is often enough to prevent recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA). Point-by-point encircling of the PVs with radiofrequency (RF) applications, together with cryoballoon ablation, have been the mainstay strategies for the last 10 to 20 years. Each of these strategies, however, suffers from the delicate balance between preventing PV reconnection, on the one hand (toward more energy), and preventing (mainly esophageal) complications (toward less energy), on the other. The CLOSE protocol was developed as an RF ablation strategy that would result in the safe creation of durable isolation leading to improved outcomes. Basically, the aim of the protocol is to enclose the pulmonary veins with stable, contiguous (intertag distance, ITD ≤ 6 mm) and optimized lesions (35 Watts, W, RF applications up to ablation index targets of ≥400 and ≥550 at the posterior and anterior wall). In this review, we describe the background of the CLOSE protocol and the studies from the St Jan Bruges research group on procedural performance, efficacy, and safety of the CLOSE protocol in (a) single-center prospective PILOT study (CLOSE-PILOT), (b) a single-center prospective study with continuous rhythm monitoring (CLOSE to CURE), (c) a database of systematic esophageal endoscopic studies, (d) a multicenter prospective study (VISTAX), and (e) the CLOSE database (comprising > 400 patients). We also discuss the results of the randomized POWER-AF study comparing conventional CLOSE to high power CLOSE (up to 50 W). Finally, we discuss the performance, safety, and efficacy of the CLOSE protocol in light of the emerging changes in the field of catheter ablation being ultra-short high-power ablation and electroporation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8469113
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84691132021-09-27 How Close Are We toward an Optimal Balance in Safety and Efficacy in Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation? Lessons from the CLOSE Protocol Lycke, Michelle O’Neill, Louisa Gillis, Kris Wielandts, Jean-Yves Le Polain De Waroux, Jean-Benoit Tavernier, Rene Knecht, Sebastien Duytschaever, Mattias J Clin Med Review Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common treatment strategy in patients with drug-resistant, symptomatic AF. In patients with paroxysmal and short-standing persistent AF, pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is often enough to prevent recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA). Point-by-point encircling of the PVs with radiofrequency (RF) applications, together with cryoballoon ablation, have been the mainstay strategies for the last 10 to 20 years. Each of these strategies, however, suffers from the delicate balance between preventing PV reconnection, on the one hand (toward more energy), and preventing (mainly esophageal) complications (toward less energy), on the other. The CLOSE protocol was developed as an RF ablation strategy that would result in the safe creation of durable isolation leading to improved outcomes. Basically, the aim of the protocol is to enclose the pulmonary veins with stable, contiguous (intertag distance, ITD ≤ 6 mm) and optimized lesions (35 Watts, W, RF applications up to ablation index targets of ≥400 and ≥550 at the posterior and anterior wall). In this review, we describe the background of the CLOSE protocol and the studies from the St Jan Bruges research group on procedural performance, efficacy, and safety of the CLOSE protocol in (a) single-center prospective PILOT study (CLOSE-PILOT), (b) a single-center prospective study with continuous rhythm monitoring (CLOSE to CURE), (c) a database of systematic esophageal endoscopic studies, (d) a multicenter prospective study (VISTAX), and (e) the CLOSE database (comprising > 400 patients). We also discuss the results of the randomized POWER-AF study comparing conventional CLOSE to high power CLOSE (up to 50 W). Finally, we discuss the performance, safety, and efficacy of the CLOSE protocol in light of the emerging changes in the field of catheter ablation being ultra-short high-power ablation and electroporation. MDPI 2021-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8469113/ /pubmed/34575379 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10184268 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Lycke, Michelle
O’Neill, Louisa
Gillis, Kris
Wielandts, Jean-Yves
Le Polain De Waroux, Jean-Benoit
Tavernier, Rene
Knecht, Sebastien
Duytschaever, Mattias
How Close Are We toward an Optimal Balance in Safety and Efficacy in Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation? Lessons from the CLOSE Protocol
title How Close Are We toward an Optimal Balance in Safety and Efficacy in Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation? Lessons from the CLOSE Protocol
title_full How Close Are We toward an Optimal Balance in Safety and Efficacy in Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation? Lessons from the CLOSE Protocol
title_fullStr How Close Are We toward an Optimal Balance in Safety and Efficacy in Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation? Lessons from the CLOSE Protocol
title_full_unstemmed How Close Are We toward an Optimal Balance in Safety and Efficacy in Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation? Lessons from the CLOSE Protocol
title_short How Close Are We toward an Optimal Balance in Safety and Efficacy in Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation? Lessons from the CLOSE Protocol
title_sort how close are we toward an optimal balance in safety and efficacy in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation? lessons from the close protocol
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8469113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34575379
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10184268
work_keys_str_mv AT lyckemichelle howclosearewetowardanoptimalbalanceinsafetyandefficacyincatheterablationofatrialfibrillationlessonsfromthecloseprotocol
AT oneilllouisa howclosearewetowardanoptimalbalanceinsafetyandefficacyincatheterablationofatrialfibrillationlessonsfromthecloseprotocol
AT gilliskris howclosearewetowardanoptimalbalanceinsafetyandefficacyincatheterablationofatrialfibrillationlessonsfromthecloseprotocol
AT wielandtsjeanyves howclosearewetowardanoptimalbalanceinsafetyandefficacyincatheterablationofatrialfibrillationlessonsfromthecloseprotocol
AT lepolaindewarouxjeanbenoit howclosearewetowardanoptimalbalanceinsafetyandefficacyincatheterablationofatrialfibrillationlessonsfromthecloseprotocol
AT tavernierrene howclosearewetowardanoptimalbalanceinsafetyandefficacyincatheterablationofatrialfibrillationlessonsfromthecloseprotocol
AT knechtsebastien howclosearewetowardanoptimalbalanceinsafetyandefficacyincatheterablationofatrialfibrillationlessonsfromthecloseprotocol
AT duytschaevermattias howclosearewetowardanoptimalbalanceinsafetyandefficacyincatheterablationofatrialfibrillationlessonsfromthecloseprotocol