Cargando…

Evaluation of Two Serological Assays for Diagnosing Zika Virus Infection

Zika virus (ZIKV) emerged and spread rapidly in South American countries during 2015. Efforts to diagnose ZIKV infection using serological tools were challenging in dengue-endemic areas because of antigenic similarities between both viruses. Here, we assessed the performance of an in-house developed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Loyola, Steev, Huaman, Alfredo, Popuche, Dina, Castillo, Elizabeth, Ampuero, Julia S., Silva, Maria, Guevara, Carolina, Watts, Douglas M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8469165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34574037
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091696
_version_ 1784573860637573120
author Loyola, Steev
Huaman, Alfredo
Popuche, Dina
Castillo, Elizabeth
Ampuero, Julia S.
Silva, Maria
Guevara, Carolina
Watts, Douglas M.
author_facet Loyola, Steev
Huaman, Alfredo
Popuche, Dina
Castillo, Elizabeth
Ampuero, Julia S.
Silva, Maria
Guevara, Carolina
Watts, Douglas M.
author_sort Loyola, Steev
collection PubMed
description Zika virus (ZIKV) emerged and spread rapidly in South American countries during 2015. Efforts to diagnose ZIKV infection using serological tools were challenging in dengue-endemic areas because of antigenic similarities between both viruses. Here, we assessed the performance of an in-house developed IgM antibody capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (MAC-ELISA) and the plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) to diagnose ZIKV infection. Acute and convalescent paired serum samples from 51 patients who presented with clinical symptoms suggestive of an arbovirus illness in dengue-endemic areas of Honduras, Venezuela, Colombia and Peru were used in the assessment. Samples were tested for ZIKV, dengue and chikungunya virus using a variety of laboratory techniques. The results for the ZIKV-RNA screening and seroconversion detected by the microneutralization test were used to construct a composite reference standard. The overall sensitivity and specificity for the MAC-ELISA were 93.5% and 100.0%, respectively. Contrastingly, the overall sensitivity and specificity for the PRNT were 96.8% and 95.0%, respectively. Restricting the analysis according to IgM or neutralizing antibodies against dengue, the performances of both serological assays were adequate. The findings of this study reveal that the MAC-ELISA and PRNT would provide initial reliable laboratory diagnostic assays for ZIKV infection in dengue-endemic areas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8469165
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84691652021-09-27 Evaluation of Two Serological Assays for Diagnosing Zika Virus Infection Loyola, Steev Huaman, Alfredo Popuche, Dina Castillo, Elizabeth Ampuero, Julia S. Silva, Maria Guevara, Carolina Watts, Douglas M. Diagnostics (Basel) Article Zika virus (ZIKV) emerged and spread rapidly in South American countries during 2015. Efforts to diagnose ZIKV infection using serological tools were challenging in dengue-endemic areas because of antigenic similarities between both viruses. Here, we assessed the performance of an in-house developed IgM antibody capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (MAC-ELISA) and the plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) to diagnose ZIKV infection. Acute and convalescent paired serum samples from 51 patients who presented with clinical symptoms suggestive of an arbovirus illness in dengue-endemic areas of Honduras, Venezuela, Colombia and Peru were used in the assessment. Samples were tested for ZIKV, dengue and chikungunya virus using a variety of laboratory techniques. The results for the ZIKV-RNA screening and seroconversion detected by the microneutralization test were used to construct a composite reference standard. The overall sensitivity and specificity for the MAC-ELISA were 93.5% and 100.0%, respectively. Contrastingly, the overall sensitivity and specificity for the PRNT were 96.8% and 95.0%, respectively. Restricting the analysis according to IgM or neutralizing antibodies against dengue, the performances of both serological assays were adequate. The findings of this study reveal that the MAC-ELISA and PRNT would provide initial reliable laboratory diagnostic assays for ZIKV infection in dengue-endemic areas. MDPI 2021-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8469165/ /pubmed/34574037 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091696 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Loyola, Steev
Huaman, Alfredo
Popuche, Dina
Castillo, Elizabeth
Ampuero, Julia S.
Silva, Maria
Guevara, Carolina
Watts, Douglas M.
Evaluation of Two Serological Assays for Diagnosing Zika Virus Infection
title Evaluation of Two Serological Assays for Diagnosing Zika Virus Infection
title_full Evaluation of Two Serological Assays for Diagnosing Zika Virus Infection
title_fullStr Evaluation of Two Serological Assays for Diagnosing Zika Virus Infection
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Two Serological Assays for Diagnosing Zika Virus Infection
title_short Evaluation of Two Serological Assays for Diagnosing Zika Virus Infection
title_sort evaluation of two serological assays for diagnosing zika virus infection
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8469165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34574037
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091696
work_keys_str_mv AT loyolasteev evaluationoftwoserologicalassaysfordiagnosingzikavirusinfection
AT huamanalfredo evaluationoftwoserologicalassaysfordiagnosingzikavirusinfection
AT popuchedina evaluationoftwoserologicalassaysfordiagnosingzikavirusinfection
AT castilloelizabeth evaluationoftwoserologicalassaysfordiagnosingzikavirusinfection
AT ampuerojulias evaluationoftwoserologicalassaysfordiagnosingzikavirusinfection
AT silvamaria evaluationoftwoserologicalassaysfordiagnosingzikavirusinfection
AT guevaracarolina evaluationoftwoserologicalassaysfordiagnosingzikavirusinfection
AT wattsdouglasm evaluationoftwoserologicalassaysfordiagnosingzikavirusinfection