Cargando…
Evaluation of Two Serological Assays for Diagnosing Zika Virus Infection
Zika virus (ZIKV) emerged and spread rapidly in South American countries during 2015. Efforts to diagnose ZIKV infection using serological tools were challenging in dengue-endemic areas because of antigenic similarities between both viruses. Here, we assessed the performance of an in-house developed...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8469165/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34574037 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091696 |
_version_ | 1784573860637573120 |
---|---|
author | Loyola, Steev Huaman, Alfredo Popuche, Dina Castillo, Elizabeth Ampuero, Julia S. Silva, Maria Guevara, Carolina Watts, Douglas M. |
author_facet | Loyola, Steev Huaman, Alfredo Popuche, Dina Castillo, Elizabeth Ampuero, Julia S. Silva, Maria Guevara, Carolina Watts, Douglas M. |
author_sort | Loyola, Steev |
collection | PubMed |
description | Zika virus (ZIKV) emerged and spread rapidly in South American countries during 2015. Efforts to diagnose ZIKV infection using serological tools were challenging in dengue-endemic areas because of antigenic similarities between both viruses. Here, we assessed the performance of an in-house developed IgM antibody capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (MAC-ELISA) and the plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) to diagnose ZIKV infection. Acute and convalescent paired serum samples from 51 patients who presented with clinical symptoms suggestive of an arbovirus illness in dengue-endemic areas of Honduras, Venezuela, Colombia and Peru were used in the assessment. Samples were tested for ZIKV, dengue and chikungunya virus using a variety of laboratory techniques. The results for the ZIKV-RNA screening and seroconversion detected by the microneutralization test were used to construct a composite reference standard. The overall sensitivity and specificity for the MAC-ELISA were 93.5% and 100.0%, respectively. Contrastingly, the overall sensitivity and specificity for the PRNT were 96.8% and 95.0%, respectively. Restricting the analysis according to IgM or neutralizing antibodies against dengue, the performances of both serological assays were adequate. The findings of this study reveal that the MAC-ELISA and PRNT would provide initial reliable laboratory diagnostic assays for ZIKV infection in dengue-endemic areas. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8469165 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84691652021-09-27 Evaluation of Two Serological Assays for Diagnosing Zika Virus Infection Loyola, Steev Huaman, Alfredo Popuche, Dina Castillo, Elizabeth Ampuero, Julia S. Silva, Maria Guevara, Carolina Watts, Douglas M. Diagnostics (Basel) Article Zika virus (ZIKV) emerged and spread rapidly in South American countries during 2015. Efforts to diagnose ZIKV infection using serological tools were challenging in dengue-endemic areas because of antigenic similarities between both viruses. Here, we assessed the performance of an in-house developed IgM antibody capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (MAC-ELISA) and the plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) to diagnose ZIKV infection. Acute and convalescent paired serum samples from 51 patients who presented with clinical symptoms suggestive of an arbovirus illness in dengue-endemic areas of Honduras, Venezuela, Colombia and Peru were used in the assessment. Samples were tested for ZIKV, dengue and chikungunya virus using a variety of laboratory techniques. The results for the ZIKV-RNA screening and seroconversion detected by the microneutralization test were used to construct a composite reference standard. The overall sensitivity and specificity for the MAC-ELISA were 93.5% and 100.0%, respectively. Contrastingly, the overall sensitivity and specificity for the PRNT were 96.8% and 95.0%, respectively. Restricting the analysis according to IgM or neutralizing antibodies against dengue, the performances of both serological assays were adequate. The findings of this study reveal that the MAC-ELISA and PRNT would provide initial reliable laboratory diagnostic assays for ZIKV infection in dengue-endemic areas. MDPI 2021-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8469165/ /pubmed/34574037 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091696 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Loyola, Steev Huaman, Alfredo Popuche, Dina Castillo, Elizabeth Ampuero, Julia S. Silva, Maria Guevara, Carolina Watts, Douglas M. Evaluation of Two Serological Assays for Diagnosing Zika Virus Infection |
title | Evaluation of Two Serological Assays for Diagnosing Zika Virus Infection |
title_full | Evaluation of Two Serological Assays for Diagnosing Zika Virus Infection |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Two Serological Assays for Diagnosing Zika Virus Infection |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Two Serological Assays for Diagnosing Zika Virus Infection |
title_short | Evaluation of Two Serological Assays for Diagnosing Zika Virus Infection |
title_sort | evaluation of two serological assays for diagnosing zika virus infection |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8469165/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34574037 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091696 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT loyolasteev evaluationoftwoserologicalassaysfordiagnosingzikavirusinfection AT huamanalfredo evaluationoftwoserologicalassaysfordiagnosingzikavirusinfection AT popuchedina evaluationoftwoserologicalassaysfordiagnosingzikavirusinfection AT castilloelizabeth evaluationoftwoserologicalassaysfordiagnosingzikavirusinfection AT ampuerojulias evaluationoftwoserologicalassaysfordiagnosingzikavirusinfection AT silvamaria evaluationoftwoserologicalassaysfordiagnosingzikavirusinfection AT guevaracarolina evaluationoftwoserologicalassaysfordiagnosingzikavirusinfection AT wattsdouglasm evaluationoftwoserologicalassaysfordiagnosingzikavirusinfection |