Cargando…

Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Surveillance of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Our meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of surveillance magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and to compare the diagnostic performance of sMRI between different protocols. Original articles about the diagnostic accuracy of sMRI for de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Dong Hwan, Choi, Sang Hyun, Shim, Ju Hyun, Kim, So Yeon, Lee, Seung Soo, Byun, Jae Ho, Kim, Kyung Won, Choi, Joon-Il
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8469328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34574006
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091665
_version_ 1784573902893088768
author Kim, Dong Hwan
Choi, Sang Hyun
Shim, Ju Hyun
Kim, So Yeon
Lee, Seung Soo
Byun, Jae Ho
Kim, Kyung Won
Choi, Joon-Il
author_facet Kim, Dong Hwan
Choi, Sang Hyun
Shim, Ju Hyun
Kim, So Yeon
Lee, Seung Soo
Byun, Jae Ho
Kim, Kyung Won
Choi, Joon-Il
author_sort Kim, Dong Hwan
collection PubMed
description Our meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of surveillance magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and to compare the diagnostic performance of sMRI between different protocols. Original articles about the diagnostic accuracy of sMRI for detecting HCC were found in major databases. The meta-analytic pooled sensitivity and specificity of sMRI for detecting HCC were determined using a bivariate random effects model. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of full MRI and abbreviated MRI protocols were compared using bivariate meta-regression. In the total seven included studies (1830 patients), the pooled sensitivity of sMRI for any-stage HCC and very early-stage HCC were 85% (95% confidence interval, 79–90%; I(2) = 0%) and 77% (66–85%; I(2) = 32%), respectively. The pooled specificity for any-stage HCC and very early-stage HCC were 94% (90–97%; I(2) = 94%) and 94% (88–97%; I(2) = 96%), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of abbreviated MRI protocols were 87% (80–94%) and 94% (90–98%), values that were comparable with those of full MRI protocols (84% [76–91%] and 94% [89–99%]; p = 0.83). In conclusion, sMRI had good sensitivity for detecting HCC, particularly very early-stage HCC. Abbreviated MRI protocols for HCC surveillance had comparable diagnostic performance to full MRI protocols.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8469328
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84693282021-09-27 Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Surveillance of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Kim, Dong Hwan Choi, Sang Hyun Shim, Ju Hyun Kim, So Yeon Lee, Seung Soo Byun, Jae Ho Kim, Kyung Won Choi, Joon-Il Diagnostics (Basel) Systematic Review Our meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of surveillance magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and to compare the diagnostic performance of sMRI between different protocols. Original articles about the diagnostic accuracy of sMRI for detecting HCC were found in major databases. The meta-analytic pooled sensitivity and specificity of sMRI for detecting HCC were determined using a bivariate random effects model. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of full MRI and abbreviated MRI protocols were compared using bivariate meta-regression. In the total seven included studies (1830 patients), the pooled sensitivity of sMRI for any-stage HCC and very early-stage HCC were 85% (95% confidence interval, 79–90%; I(2) = 0%) and 77% (66–85%; I(2) = 32%), respectively. The pooled specificity for any-stage HCC and very early-stage HCC were 94% (90–97%; I(2) = 94%) and 94% (88–97%; I(2) = 96%), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of abbreviated MRI protocols were 87% (80–94%) and 94% (90–98%), values that were comparable with those of full MRI protocols (84% [76–91%] and 94% [89–99%]; p = 0.83). In conclusion, sMRI had good sensitivity for detecting HCC, particularly very early-stage HCC. Abbreviated MRI protocols for HCC surveillance had comparable diagnostic performance to full MRI protocols. MDPI 2021-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8469328/ /pubmed/34574006 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091665 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Kim, Dong Hwan
Choi, Sang Hyun
Shim, Ju Hyun
Kim, So Yeon
Lee, Seung Soo
Byun, Jae Ho
Kim, Kyung Won
Choi, Joon-Il
Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Surveillance of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Surveillance of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Surveillance of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Surveillance of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Surveillance of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Surveillance of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8469328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34574006
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091665
work_keys_str_mv AT kimdonghwan magneticresonanceimagingforsurveillanceofhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT choisanghyun magneticresonanceimagingforsurveillanceofhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shimjuhyun magneticresonanceimagingforsurveillanceofhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kimsoyeon magneticresonanceimagingforsurveillanceofhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT leeseungsoo magneticresonanceimagingforsurveillanceofhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT byunjaeho magneticresonanceimagingforsurveillanceofhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kimkyungwon magneticresonanceimagingforsurveillanceofhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT choijoonil magneticresonanceimagingforsurveillanceofhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis