Cargando…
Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Surveillance of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Our meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of surveillance magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and to compare the diagnostic performance of sMRI between different protocols. Original articles about the diagnostic accuracy of sMRI for de...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8469328/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34574006 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091665 |
_version_ | 1784573902893088768 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Dong Hwan Choi, Sang Hyun Shim, Ju Hyun Kim, So Yeon Lee, Seung Soo Byun, Jae Ho Kim, Kyung Won Choi, Joon-Il |
author_facet | Kim, Dong Hwan Choi, Sang Hyun Shim, Ju Hyun Kim, So Yeon Lee, Seung Soo Byun, Jae Ho Kim, Kyung Won Choi, Joon-Il |
author_sort | Kim, Dong Hwan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Our meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of surveillance magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and to compare the diagnostic performance of sMRI between different protocols. Original articles about the diagnostic accuracy of sMRI for detecting HCC were found in major databases. The meta-analytic pooled sensitivity and specificity of sMRI for detecting HCC were determined using a bivariate random effects model. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of full MRI and abbreviated MRI protocols were compared using bivariate meta-regression. In the total seven included studies (1830 patients), the pooled sensitivity of sMRI for any-stage HCC and very early-stage HCC were 85% (95% confidence interval, 79–90%; I(2) = 0%) and 77% (66–85%; I(2) = 32%), respectively. The pooled specificity for any-stage HCC and very early-stage HCC were 94% (90–97%; I(2) = 94%) and 94% (88–97%; I(2) = 96%), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of abbreviated MRI protocols were 87% (80–94%) and 94% (90–98%), values that were comparable with those of full MRI protocols (84% [76–91%] and 94% [89–99%]; p = 0.83). In conclusion, sMRI had good sensitivity for detecting HCC, particularly very early-stage HCC. Abbreviated MRI protocols for HCC surveillance had comparable diagnostic performance to full MRI protocols. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8469328 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84693282021-09-27 Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Surveillance of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Kim, Dong Hwan Choi, Sang Hyun Shim, Ju Hyun Kim, So Yeon Lee, Seung Soo Byun, Jae Ho Kim, Kyung Won Choi, Joon-Il Diagnostics (Basel) Systematic Review Our meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of surveillance magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and to compare the diagnostic performance of sMRI between different protocols. Original articles about the diagnostic accuracy of sMRI for detecting HCC were found in major databases. The meta-analytic pooled sensitivity and specificity of sMRI for detecting HCC were determined using a bivariate random effects model. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of full MRI and abbreviated MRI protocols were compared using bivariate meta-regression. In the total seven included studies (1830 patients), the pooled sensitivity of sMRI for any-stage HCC and very early-stage HCC were 85% (95% confidence interval, 79–90%; I(2) = 0%) and 77% (66–85%; I(2) = 32%), respectively. The pooled specificity for any-stage HCC and very early-stage HCC were 94% (90–97%; I(2) = 94%) and 94% (88–97%; I(2) = 96%), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of abbreviated MRI protocols were 87% (80–94%) and 94% (90–98%), values that were comparable with those of full MRI protocols (84% [76–91%] and 94% [89–99%]; p = 0.83). In conclusion, sMRI had good sensitivity for detecting HCC, particularly very early-stage HCC. Abbreviated MRI protocols for HCC surveillance had comparable diagnostic performance to full MRI protocols. MDPI 2021-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8469328/ /pubmed/34574006 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091665 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Kim, Dong Hwan Choi, Sang Hyun Shim, Ju Hyun Kim, So Yeon Lee, Seung Soo Byun, Jae Ho Kim, Kyung Won Choi, Joon-Il Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Surveillance of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Surveillance of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Surveillance of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Surveillance of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Surveillance of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Surveillance of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8469328/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34574006 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091665 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimdonghwan magneticresonanceimagingforsurveillanceofhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT choisanghyun magneticresonanceimagingforsurveillanceofhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shimjuhyun magneticresonanceimagingforsurveillanceofhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kimsoyeon magneticresonanceimagingforsurveillanceofhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT leeseungsoo magneticresonanceimagingforsurveillanceofhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT byunjaeho magneticresonanceimagingforsurveillanceofhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kimkyungwon magneticresonanceimagingforsurveillanceofhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT choijoonil magneticresonanceimagingforsurveillanceofhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |