Cargando…

Differences in the Prevalence of Clinical Adjacent Segment Pathology among Continents after Anterior Cervical Fusion: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Development of adjacent segment pathology leading to secondary operation is a matter of concern after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Some studies have reported anatomic difference between races, but no epidemiological data on prevalence of clinical adjacent segment pathology (cASP)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chung, Young-Woo, Kim, Sung-Kyu, Park, Yong-Jin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8469442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34575236
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10184125
_version_ 1784573932419940352
author Chung, Young-Woo
Kim, Sung-Kyu
Park, Yong-Jin
author_facet Chung, Young-Woo
Kim, Sung-Kyu
Park, Yong-Jin
author_sort Chung, Young-Woo
collection PubMed
description Development of adjacent segment pathology leading to secondary operation is a matter of concern after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Some studies have reported anatomic difference between races, but no epidemiological data on prevalence of clinical adjacent segment pathology (cASP) among races or continents has been published. The purpose of this study was to compare the prevalence of cASP that underwent surgery after monosegmental ACDF among continents by meta-analysis. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library with manual searching in key journals, reference lists, and the National Technical Information Service were searched from inception to December 2018. Twenty studies with a total of 2009 patients were included in the meta-analysis. We extracted the publication details, sample size, and prevalence of cASP that underwent surgery. A total of 15 papers from North America, three from Europe, and two from Asia met the inclusion criteria. A total number of 2009 patients underwent monosegmental ACDF, and 113 patients (5.62%) among them had cASP that underwent surgery. The rate of cASP that underwent surgery was 4.99% in the North America, 3.65% in the Europe, 6.34% in the Asia, and there were no statistically significant differences (p = 0.63). The current study using the method of meta-analysis revealed that there were no significant differences in the rate of cASP that underwent surgery after ACDF among the continents.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8469442
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84694422021-09-27 Differences in the Prevalence of Clinical Adjacent Segment Pathology among Continents after Anterior Cervical Fusion: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Chung, Young-Woo Kim, Sung-Kyu Park, Yong-Jin J Clin Med Article Development of adjacent segment pathology leading to secondary operation is a matter of concern after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Some studies have reported anatomic difference between races, but no epidemiological data on prevalence of clinical adjacent segment pathology (cASP) among races or continents has been published. The purpose of this study was to compare the prevalence of cASP that underwent surgery after monosegmental ACDF among continents by meta-analysis. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library with manual searching in key journals, reference lists, and the National Technical Information Service were searched from inception to December 2018. Twenty studies with a total of 2009 patients were included in the meta-analysis. We extracted the publication details, sample size, and prevalence of cASP that underwent surgery. A total of 15 papers from North America, three from Europe, and two from Asia met the inclusion criteria. A total number of 2009 patients underwent monosegmental ACDF, and 113 patients (5.62%) among them had cASP that underwent surgery. The rate of cASP that underwent surgery was 4.99% in the North America, 3.65% in the Europe, 6.34% in the Asia, and there were no statistically significant differences (p = 0.63). The current study using the method of meta-analysis revealed that there were no significant differences in the rate of cASP that underwent surgery after ACDF among the continents. MDPI 2021-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8469442/ /pubmed/34575236 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10184125 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Chung, Young-Woo
Kim, Sung-Kyu
Park, Yong-Jin
Differences in the Prevalence of Clinical Adjacent Segment Pathology among Continents after Anterior Cervical Fusion: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title Differences in the Prevalence of Clinical Adjacent Segment Pathology among Continents after Anterior Cervical Fusion: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full Differences in the Prevalence of Clinical Adjacent Segment Pathology among Continents after Anterior Cervical Fusion: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr Differences in the Prevalence of Clinical Adjacent Segment Pathology among Continents after Anterior Cervical Fusion: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed Differences in the Prevalence of Clinical Adjacent Segment Pathology among Continents after Anterior Cervical Fusion: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_short Differences in the Prevalence of Clinical Adjacent Segment Pathology among Continents after Anterior Cervical Fusion: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort differences in the prevalence of clinical adjacent segment pathology among continents after anterior cervical fusion: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8469442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34575236
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10184125
work_keys_str_mv AT chungyoungwoo differencesintheprevalenceofclinicaladjacentsegmentpathologyamongcontinentsafteranteriorcervicalfusionmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT kimsungkyu differencesintheprevalenceofclinicaladjacentsegmentpathologyamongcontinentsafteranteriorcervicalfusionmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT parkyongjin differencesintheprevalenceofclinicaladjacentsegmentpathologyamongcontinentsafteranteriorcervicalfusionmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials