Cargando…
Systematic Literature Review of Capitation and Fee-for-Service Payment Models for Oral Health Services: An Australian Perspective
The aim of this review was to assess relevant global literature on capped-fee (CF) and fee-for-service (FFS) payment models as used by public dental services. Research data were assessed through the PRISMA check list and sourced from MEDLINE, PubMed, ProQuest, Cochrane Library, and other methods. Th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8469501/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34574902 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9091129 |
_version_ | 1784573948150677504 |
---|---|
author | Conquest, Jennifer H. Gill, Nirjgot Sivanujan, Praveena Skinner, John Kruger, Estie Tennant, Marc |
author_facet | Conquest, Jennifer H. Gill, Nirjgot Sivanujan, Praveena Skinner, John Kruger, Estie Tennant, Marc |
author_sort | Conquest, Jennifer H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this review was to assess relevant global literature on capped-fee (CF) and fee-for-service (FFS) payment models as used by public dental services. Research data were assessed through the PRISMA check list and sourced from MEDLINE, PubMed, ProQuest, Cochrane Library, and other methods. The inclusion criteria were peer reviewed articles published between 2004 and 2020 and (i) other countries’ health systems that were evaluated in contrast to Australia; (ii) care provided to individuals; (iii) payment models for private services that were the same as Australian government policy (CF and FFS); and (iv) care provided by dentists. We used a mixed methodology for data collection. A total of 262 references were reviewed with 10 references meeting the inclusion criteria with the quality rating being: three—strong, six—moderate, and one—weak. The literature included studies from Sweden (three references), Ireland (three references), United Kingdom (six references), United States of America (two references), and Norway (one reference). Four references included studies within multiple countries. The sample size varied between 20 and 106,874 participants. The two payment systems can impact on individual outcomes, such as by overtreatment in an FFS system and undertreatment in a CF system. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8469501 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84695012021-09-27 Systematic Literature Review of Capitation and Fee-for-Service Payment Models for Oral Health Services: An Australian Perspective Conquest, Jennifer H. Gill, Nirjgot Sivanujan, Praveena Skinner, John Kruger, Estie Tennant, Marc Healthcare (Basel) Article The aim of this review was to assess relevant global literature on capped-fee (CF) and fee-for-service (FFS) payment models as used by public dental services. Research data were assessed through the PRISMA check list and sourced from MEDLINE, PubMed, ProQuest, Cochrane Library, and other methods. The inclusion criteria were peer reviewed articles published between 2004 and 2020 and (i) other countries’ health systems that were evaluated in contrast to Australia; (ii) care provided to individuals; (iii) payment models for private services that were the same as Australian government policy (CF and FFS); and (iv) care provided by dentists. We used a mixed methodology for data collection. A total of 262 references were reviewed with 10 references meeting the inclusion criteria with the quality rating being: three—strong, six—moderate, and one—weak. The literature included studies from Sweden (three references), Ireland (three references), United Kingdom (six references), United States of America (two references), and Norway (one reference). Four references included studies within multiple countries. The sample size varied between 20 and 106,874 participants. The two payment systems can impact on individual outcomes, such as by overtreatment in an FFS system and undertreatment in a CF system. MDPI 2021-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8469501/ /pubmed/34574902 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9091129 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Conquest, Jennifer H. Gill, Nirjgot Sivanujan, Praveena Skinner, John Kruger, Estie Tennant, Marc Systematic Literature Review of Capitation and Fee-for-Service Payment Models for Oral Health Services: An Australian Perspective |
title | Systematic Literature Review of Capitation and Fee-for-Service Payment Models for Oral Health Services: An Australian Perspective |
title_full | Systematic Literature Review of Capitation and Fee-for-Service Payment Models for Oral Health Services: An Australian Perspective |
title_fullStr | Systematic Literature Review of Capitation and Fee-for-Service Payment Models for Oral Health Services: An Australian Perspective |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic Literature Review of Capitation and Fee-for-Service Payment Models for Oral Health Services: An Australian Perspective |
title_short | Systematic Literature Review of Capitation and Fee-for-Service Payment Models for Oral Health Services: An Australian Perspective |
title_sort | systematic literature review of capitation and fee-for-service payment models for oral health services: an australian perspective |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8469501/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34574902 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9091129 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT conquestjenniferh systematicliteraturereviewofcapitationandfeeforservicepaymentmodelsfororalhealthservicesanaustralianperspective AT gillnirjgot systematicliteraturereviewofcapitationandfeeforservicepaymentmodelsfororalhealthservicesanaustralianperspective AT sivanujanpraveena systematicliteraturereviewofcapitationandfeeforservicepaymentmodelsfororalhealthservicesanaustralianperspective AT skinnerjohn systematicliteraturereviewofcapitationandfeeforservicepaymentmodelsfororalhealthservicesanaustralianperspective AT krugerestie systematicliteraturereviewofcapitationandfeeforservicepaymentmodelsfororalhealthservicesanaustralianperspective AT tennantmarc systematicliteraturereviewofcapitationandfeeforservicepaymentmodelsfororalhealthservicesanaustralianperspective |