Cargando…

Non-Lead Protective Aprons for the Protection of Interventional Radiology Physicians from Radiation Exposure in Clinical Settings: An Initial Study

Radiation protection/evaluation during interventional radiology (IVR) poses a very important problem. Although IVR physicians should wear protective aprons, the IVR physician may not tolerate wearing one for long procedures because protective aprons are generally heavy. In fact, orthopedic problems...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kato, Mamoru, Chida, Koichi, Munehisa, Masato, Sato, Tadaya, Inaba, Yohei, Suzuki, Masatoshi, Zuguchi, Masayuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8469807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34573955
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091613
_version_ 1784574032363913216
author Kato, Mamoru
Chida, Koichi
Munehisa, Masato
Sato, Tadaya
Inaba, Yohei
Suzuki, Masatoshi
Zuguchi, Masayuki
author_facet Kato, Mamoru
Chida, Koichi
Munehisa, Masato
Sato, Tadaya
Inaba, Yohei
Suzuki, Masatoshi
Zuguchi, Masayuki
author_sort Kato, Mamoru
collection PubMed
description Radiation protection/evaluation during interventional radiology (IVR) poses a very important problem. Although IVR physicians should wear protective aprons, the IVR physician may not tolerate wearing one for long procedures because protective aprons are generally heavy. In fact, orthopedic problems are increasingly reported in IVR physicians due to the strain of wearing heavy protective aprons during IVR. In recent years, non-Pb protective aprons (lighter weight, composite materials) have been developed. Although non-Pb protective aprons are more expensive than Pb protective aprons, the former aprons weigh less. However, whether the protective performance of non-Pb aprons is sufficient in the IVR clinical setting is unclear. This study compared the ability of non-Pb and Pb protective aprons (0.25- and 0.35-mm Pb-equivalents) to protect physicians from scatter radiation in a clinical setting (IVR, cardiac catheterizations, including percutaneous coronary intervention) using an electric personal dosimeter (EPD). For radiation measurements, physicians wore EPDs: One inside a personal protective apron at the chest, and one outside a personal protective apron at the chest. Physician comfort levels in each apron during procedures were also evaluated. As a result, performance (both the shielding effect (98.5%) and comfort (good)) of the non-Pb 0.35-mm-Pb-equivalent protective apron was good in the clinical setting. The radiation-shielding effects of the non-Pb 0.35-mm and Pb 0.35-mm-Pb-equivalent protective aprons were very similar. Therefore, non-Pb 0.35-mm Pb-equivalent protective aprons may be more suitable for providing radiation protection for IVR physicians because the shielding effect and comfort are both good in the clinical IVR setting. As non-Pb protective aprons are nontoxic and weigh less than Pb protective aprons, non-Pb protective aprons will be the preferred type for radiation protection of IVR staff, especially physicians.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8469807
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84698072021-09-27 Non-Lead Protective Aprons for the Protection of Interventional Radiology Physicians from Radiation Exposure in Clinical Settings: An Initial Study Kato, Mamoru Chida, Koichi Munehisa, Masato Sato, Tadaya Inaba, Yohei Suzuki, Masatoshi Zuguchi, Masayuki Diagnostics (Basel) Communication Radiation protection/evaluation during interventional radiology (IVR) poses a very important problem. Although IVR physicians should wear protective aprons, the IVR physician may not tolerate wearing one for long procedures because protective aprons are generally heavy. In fact, orthopedic problems are increasingly reported in IVR physicians due to the strain of wearing heavy protective aprons during IVR. In recent years, non-Pb protective aprons (lighter weight, composite materials) have been developed. Although non-Pb protective aprons are more expensive than Pb protective aprons, the former aprons weigh less. However, whether the protective performance of non-Pb aprons is sufficient in the IVR clinical setting is unclear. This study compared the ability of non-Pb and Pb protective aprons (0.25- and 0.35-mm Pb-equivalents) to protect physicians from scatter radiation in a clinical setting (IVR, cardiac catheterizations, including percutaneous coronary intervention) using an electric personal dosimeter (EPD). For radiation measurements, physicians wore EPDs: One inside a personal protective apron at the chest, and one outside a personal protective apron at the chest. Physician comfort levels in each apron during procedures were also evaluated. As a result, performance (both the shielding effect (98.5%) and comfort (good)) of the non-Pb 0.35-mm-Pb-equivalent protective apron was good in the clinical setting. The radiation-shielding effects of the non-Pb 0.35-mm and Pb 0.35-mm-Pb-equivalent protective aprons were very similar. Therefore, non-Pb 0.35-mm Pb-equivalent protective aprons may be more suitable for providing radiation protection for IVR physicians because the shielding effect and comfort are both good in the clinical IVR setting. As non-Pb protective aprons are nontoxic and weigh less than Pb protective aprons, non-Pb protective aprons will be the preferred type for radiation protection of IVR staff, especially physicians. MDPI 2021-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8469807/ /pubmed/34573955 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091613 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Communication
Kato, Mamoru
Chida, Koichi
Munehisa, Masato
Sato, Tadaya
Inaba, Yohei
Suzuki, Masatoshi
Zuguchi, Masayuki
Non-Lead Protective Aprons for the Protection of Interventional Radiology Physicians from Radiation Exposure in Clinical Settings: An Initial Study
title Non-Lead Protective Aprons for the Protection of Interventional Radiology Physicians from Radiation Exposure in Clinical Settings: An Initial Study
title_full Non-Lead Protective Aprons for the Protection of Interventional Radiology Physicians from Radiation Exposure in Clinical Settings: An Initial Study
title_fullStr Non-Lead Protective Aprons for the Protection of Interventional Radiology Physicians from Radiation Exposure in Clinical Settings: An Initial Study
title_full_unstemmed Non-Lead Protective Aprons for the Protection of Interventional Radiology Physicians from Radiation Exposure in Clinical Settings: An Initial Study
title_short Non-Lead Protective Aprons for the Protection of Interventional Radiology Physicians from Radiation Exposure in Clinical Settings: An Initial Study
title_sort non-lead protective aprons for the protection of interventional radiology physicians from radiation exposure in clinical settings: an initial study
topic Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8469807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34573955
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091613
work_keys_str_mv AT katomamoru nonleadprotectiveapronsfortheprotectionofinterventionalradiologyphysiciansfromradiationexposureinclinicalsettingsaninitialstudy
AT chidakoichi nonleadprotectiveapronsfortheprotectionofinterventionalradiologyphysiciansfromradiationexposureinclinicalsettingsaninitialstudy
AT munehisamasato nonleadprotectiveapronsfortheprotectionofinterventionalradiologyphysiciansfromradiationexposureinclinicalsettingsaninitialstudy
AT satotadaya nonleadprotectiveapronsfortheprotectionofinterventionalradiologyphysiciansfromradiationexposureinclinicalsettingsaninitialstudy
AT inabayohei nonleadprotectiveapronsfortheprotectionofinterventionalradiologyphysiciansfromradiationexposureinclinicalsettingsaninitialstudy
AT suzukimasatoshi nonleadprotectiveapronsfortheprotectionofinterventionalradiologyphysiciansfromradiationexposureinclinicalsettingsaninitialstudy
AT zuguchimasayuki nonleadprotectiveapronsfortheprotectionofinterventionalradiologyphysiciansfromradiationexposureinclinicalsettingsaninitialstudy