Cargando…
Sepsis and Cognitive Assessment
Sepsis disproportionally affects people over the age of 65, and with an exponentially increasing older population, sepsis poses additional risks for cognitive decline. This review summarizes published literature for (1) authorship qualification; (2) the type of cognitive domains most often assessed;...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8470110/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34575380 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10184269 |
_version_ | 1784574114487336960 |
---|---|
author | Jones, Laura C. Dion, Catherine Efron, Philip A. Price, Catherine C. |
author_facet | Jones, Laura C. Dion, Catherine Efron, Philip A. Price, Catherine C. |
author_sort | Jones, Laura C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sepsis disproportionally affects people over the age of 65, and with an exponentially increasing older population, sepsis poses additional risks for cognitive decline. This review summarizes published literature for (1) authorship qualification; (2) the type of cognitive domains most often assessed; (3) timelines for cognitive assessment; (4) the control group and analysis approach, and (5) sociodemographic reporting. Using key terms, a PubMed database review from January 2000 to January 2021 identified 3050 articles, and 234 qualified as full text reviews with 18 ultimately retained as summaries. More than half (61%) included an author with an expert in cognitive assessment. Seven (39%) relied on cognitive screening tools for assessment with the remaining using a combination of standard neuropsychological measures. Cognitive domains typically assessed were declarative memory, attention and working memory, processing speed, and executive function. Analytically, 35% reported on education, and 17% included baseline (pre-sepsis) data. Eight (44%) included a non-sepsis peer group. No study considered sex or race/diversity in the statistical model, and only five studies reported on race/ethnicity, with Caucasians making up the majority (74%). Of the articles with neuropsychological measures, researchers report acute with cognitive improvement over time for sepsis survivors. The findings suggest avenues for future study designs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8470110 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84701102021-09-27 Sepsis and Cognitive Assessment Jones, Laura C. Dion, Catherine Efron, Philip A. Price, Catherine C. J Clin Med Review Sepsis disproportionally affects people over the age of 65, and with an exponentially increasing older population, sepsis poses additional risks for cognitive decline. This review summarizes published literature for (1) authorship qualification; (2) the type of cognitive domains most often assessed; (3) timelines for cognitive assessment; (4) the control group and analysis approach, and (5) sociodemographic reporting. Using key terms, a PubMed database review from January 2000 to January 2021 identified 3050 articles, and 234 qualified as full text reviews with 18 ultimately retained as summaries. More than half (61%) included an author with an expert in cognitive assessment. Seven (39%) relied on cognitive screening tools for assessment with the remaining using a combination of standard neuropsychological measures. Cognitive domains typically assessed were declarative memory, attention and working memory, processing speed, and executive function. Analytically, 35% reported on education, and 17% included baseline (pre-sepsis) data. Eight (44%) included a non-sepsis peer group. No study considered sex or race/diversity in the statistical model, and only five studies reported on race/ethnicity, with Caucasians making up the majority (74%). Of the articles with neuropsychological measures, researchers report acute with cognitive improvement over time for sepsis survivors. The findings suggest avenues for future study designs. MDPI 2021-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8470110/ /pubmed/34575380 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10184269 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Jones, Laura C. Dion, Catherine Efron, Philip A. Price, Catherine C. Sepsis and Cognitive Assessment |
title | Sepsis and Cognitive Assessment |
title_full | Sepsis and Cognitive Assessment |
title_fullStr | Sepsis and Cognitive Assessment |
title_full_unstemmed | Sepsis and Cognitive Assessment |
title_short | Sepsis and Cognitive Assessment |
title_sort | sepsis and cognitive assessment |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8470110/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34575380 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10184269 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT joneslaurac sepsisandcognitiveassessment AT dioncatherine sepsisandcognitiveassessment AT efronphilipa sepsisandcognitiveassessment AT pricecatherinec sepsisandcognitiveassessment |