Cargando…

Sepsis and Cognitive Assessment

Sepsis disproportionally affects people over the age of 65, and with an exponentially increasing older population, sepsis poses additional risks for cognitive decline. This review summarizes published literature for (1) authorship qualification; (2) the type of cognitive domains most often assessed;...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jones, Laura C., Dion, Catherine, Efron, Philip A., Price, Catherine C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8470110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34575380
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10184269
_version_ 1784574114487336960
author Jones, Laura C.
Dion, Catherine
Efron, Philip A.
Price, Catherine C.
author_facet Jones, Laura C.
Dion, Catherine
Efron, Philip A.
Price, Catherine C.
author_sort Jones, Laura C.
collection PubMed
description Sepsis disproportionally affects people over the age of 65, and with an exponentially increasing older population, sepsis poses additional risks for cognitive decline. This review summarizes published literature for (1) authorship qualification; (2) the type of cognitive domains most often assessed; (3) timelines for cognitive assessment; (4) the control group and analysis approach, and (5) sociodemographic reporting. Using key terms, a PubMed database review from January 2000 to January 2021 identified 3050 articles, and 234 qualified as full text reviews with 18 ultimately retained as summaries. More than half (61%) included an author with an expert in cognitive assessment. Seven (39%) relied on cognitive screening tools for assessment with the remaining using a combination of standard neuropsychological measures. Cognitive domains typically assessed were declarative memory, attention and working memory, processing speed, and executive function. Analytically, 35% reported on education, and 17% included baseline (pre-sepsis) data. Eight (44%) included a non-sepsis peer group. No study considered sex or race/diversity in the statistical model, and only five studies reported on race/ethnicity, with Caucasians making up the majority (74%). Of the articles with neuropsychological measures, researchers report acute with cognitive improvement over time for sepsis survivors. The findings suggest avenues for future study designs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8470110
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84701102021-09-27 Sepsis and Cognitive Assessment Jones, Laura C. Dion, Catherine Efron, Philip A. Price, Catherine C. J Clin Med Review Sepsis disproportionally affects people over the age of 65, and with an exponentially increasing older population, sepsis poses additional risks for cognitive decline. This review summarizes published literature for (1) authorship qualification; (2) the type of cognitive domains most often assessed; (3) timelines for cognitive assessment; (4) the control group and analysis approach, and (5) sociodemographic reporting. Using key terms, a PubMed database review from January 2000 to January 2021 identified 3050 articles, and 234 qualified as full text reviews with 18 ultimately retained as summaries. More than half (61%) included an author with an expert in cognitive assessment. Seven (39%) relied on cognitive screening tools for assessment with the remaining using a combination of standard neuropsychological measures. Cognitive domains typically assessed were declarative memory, attention and working memory, processing speed, and executive function. Analytically, 35% reported on education, and 17% included baseline (pre-sepsis) data. Eight (44%) included a non-sepsis peer group. No study considered sex or race/diversity in the statistical model, and only five studies reported on race/ethnicity, with Caucasians making up the majority (74%). Of the articles with neuropsychological measures, researchers report acute with cognitive improvement over time for sepsis survivors. The findings suggest avenues for future study designs. MDPI 2021-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8470110/ /pubmed/34575380 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10184269 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Jones, Laura C.
Dion, Catherine
Efron, Philip A.
Price, Catherine C.
Sepsis and Cognitive Assessment
title Sepsis and Cognitive Assessment
title_full Sepsis and Cognitive Assessment
title_fullStr Sepsis and Cognitive Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Sepsis and Cognitive Assessment
title_short Sepsis and Cognitive Assessment
title_sort sepsis and cognitive assessment
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8470110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34575380
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10184269
work_keys_str_mv AT joneslaurac sepsisandcognitiveassessment
AT dioncatherine sepsisandcognitiveassessment
AT efronphilipa sepsisandcognitiveassessment
AT pricecatherinec sepsisandcognitiveassessment