Cargando…
A Field Evaluation of the LuciTrap and the Western Australian Trap with Three Different Baits Types for Monitoring Lucilia cuprina and Lucilia sericata in New Zealand
SIMPLE SUMMARY: In New Zealand, flystrike is caused by two Dipteran species, Lucilia cuprina and Lucilia sericata. This study contrasts four flytrap treatments, the LuciTrap with its combination of three chemical lures (Lucilures) and the Western Australian Trap with three different bait types (Luci...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8470412/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34564269 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects12090829 |
_version_ | 1784574192614637568 |
---|---|
author | Brett, Paul Lawrence, Kevin Kenyon, Paul Gedye, Kristene Pomroy, William |
author_facet | Brett, Paul Lawrence, Kevin Kenyon, Paul Gedye, Kristene Pomroy, William |
author_sort | Brett, Paul |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: In New Zealand, flystrike is caused by two Dipteran species, Lucilia cuprina and Lucilia sericata. This study contrasts four flytrap treatments, the LuciTrap with its combination of three chemical lures (Lucilures) and the Western Australian Trap with three different bait types (LuciLure, Sheep liver with 30% sodium sulphide and squid) during mid-summer. The aim of the study is to assess the most effective trap and bait combination that New Zealand farmers may use on their farms to monitor L. cuprina and L. sericata. This study found that either the LuciTrap or the Western Australian Trap with sheep liver and 30% sodium sulphide were the most effective traps to catch L. cuprina and L. sericata. ABSTRACT: Flytraps can be used on farms to monitor the populations of primary strike flies (Lucilia cuprina and Lucilia sericata) and, hence, offer a view regarding the incidence of flystrike on sheep. This study aimed to contrast the specificity and effectiveness of the LuciTrap with its combination of three chemical lures (Lucilures) and the Western Australian Trap with three bait types (LuciLure, Sheep liver with 30% sodium sulphide and squid). A mean model and rate model were fitted to the data. The mean model showed no difference (p > 0.05) in the mean weekly catch for L. cuprina between the Western Australian Trap with LuciLures and the Western Australian Trap baited with sheep liver with 30% sodium sulphide (p < 0.05). Whereas, for L. sericata, no difference (p > 0.05) was found between the Western Australian Trap with LuciLures, the Western Australian Trap baited with sheep liver with 30% sodium sulphide and the LuciTrap. The rate model illustrated that the Western Australian Trap with sheep liver with 30% sodium sulphide and LuciTrap did not differ (p > 0.05) for L. cuprina and L. sericata. Combined, these results indicate that New Zealand farmers can use either the LuciTrap or the Western Australian Trap with sheep liver with 30% sodium sulphide to monitor these target species. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8470412 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84704122021-09-27 A Field Evaluation of the LuciTrap and the Western Australian Trap with Three Different Baits Types for Monitoring Lucilia cuprina and Lucilia sericata in New Zealand Brett, Paul Lawrence, Kevin Kenyon, Paul Gedye, Kristene Pomroy, William Insects Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: In New Zealand, flystrike is caused by two Dipteran species, Lucilia cuprina and Lucilia sericata. This study contrasts four flytrap treatments, the LuciTrap with its combination of three chemical lures (Lucilures) and the Western Australian Trap with three different bait types (LuciLure, Sheep liver with 30% sodium sulphide and squid) during mid-summer. The aim of the study is to assess the most effective trap and bait combination that New Zealand farmers may use on their farms to monitor L. cuprina and L. sericata. This study found that either the LuciTrap or the Western Australian Trap with sheep liver and 30% sodium sulphide were the most effective traps to catch L. cuprina and L. sericata. ABSTRACT: Flytraps can be used on farms to monitor the populations of primary strike flies (Lucilia cuprina and Lucilia sericata) and, hence, offer a view regarding the incidence of flystrike on sheep. This study aimed to contrast the specificity and effectiveness of the LuciTrap with its combination of three chemical lures (Lucilures) and the Western Australian Trap with three bait types (LuciLure, Sheep liver with 30% sodium sulphide and squid). A mean model and rate model were fitted to the data. The mean model showed no difference (p > 0.05) in the mean weekly catch for L. cuprina between the Western Australian Trap with LuciLures and the Western Australian Trap baited with sheep liver with 30% sodium sulphide (p < 0.05). Whereas, for L. sericata, no difference (p > 0.05) was found between the Western Australian Trap with LuciLures, the Western Australian Trap baited with sheep liver with 30% sodium sulphide and the LuciTrap. The rate model illustrated that the Western Australian Trap with sheep liver with 30% sodium sulphide and LuciTrap did not differ (p > 0.05) for L. cuprina and L. sericata. Combined, these results indicate that New Zealand farmers can use either the LuciTrap or the Western Australian Trap with sheep liver with 30% sodium sulphide to monitor these target species. MDPI 2021-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8470412/ /pubmed/34564269 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects12090829 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Brett, Paul Lawrence, Kevin Kenyon, Paul Gedye, Kristene Pomroy, William A Field Evaluation of the LuciTrap and the Western Australian Trap with Three Different Baits Types for Monitoring Lucilia cuprina and Lucilia sericata in New Zealand |
title | A Field Evaluation of the LuciTrap and the Western Australian Trap with Three Different Baits Types for Monitoring Lucilia cuprina and Lucilia sericata in New Zealand |
title_full | A Field Evaluation of the LuciTrap and the Western Australian Trap with Three Different Baits Types for Monitoring Lucilia cuprina and Lucilia sericata in New Zealand |
title_fullStr | A Field Evaluation of the LuciTrap and the Western Australian Trap with Three Different Baits Types for Monitoring Lucilia cuprina and Lucilia sericata in New Zealand |
title_full_unstemmed | A Field Evaluation of the LuciTrap and the Western Australian Trap with Three Different Baits Types for Monitoring Lucilia cuprina and Lucilia sericata in New Zealand |
title_short | A Field Evaluation of the LuciTrap and the Western Australian Trap with Three Different Baits Types for Monitoring Lucilia cuprina and Lucilia sericata in New Zealand |
title_sort | field evaluation of the lucitrap and the western australian trap with three different baits types for monitoring lucilia cuprina and lucilia sericata in new zealand |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8470412/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34564269 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects12090829 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brettpaul afieldevaluationofthelucitrapandthewesternaustraliantrapwiththreedifferentbaitstypesformonitoringluciliacuprinaandluciliasericatainnewzealand AT lawrencekevin afieldevaluationofthelucitrapandthewesternaustraliantrapwiththreedifferentbaitstypesformonitoringluciliacuprinaandluciliasericatainnewzealand AT kenyonpaul afieldevaluationofthelucitrapandthewesternaustraliantrapwiththreedifferentbaitstypesformonitoringluciliacuprinaandluciliasericatainnewzealand AT gedyekristene afieldevaluationofthelucitrapandthewesternaustraliantrapwiththreedifferentbaitstypesformonitoringluciliacuprinaandluciliasericatainnewzealand AT pomroywilliam afieldevaluationofthelucitrapandthewesternaustraliantrapwiththreedifferentbaitstypesformonitoringluciliacuprinaandluciliasericatainnewzealand AT brettpaul fieldevaluationofthelucitrapandthewesternaustraliantrapwiththreedifferentbaitstypesformonitoringluciliacuprinaandluciliasericatainnewzealand AT lawrencekevin fieldevaluationofthelucitrapandthewesternaustraliantrapwiththreedifferentbaitstypesformonitoringluciliacuprinaandluciliasericatainnewzealand AT kenyonpaul fieldevaluationofthelucitrapandthewesternaustraliantrapwiththreedifferentbaitstypesformonitoringluciliacuprinaandluciliasericatainnewzealand AT gedyekristene fieldevaluationofthelucitrapandthewesternaustraliantrapwiththreedifferentbaitstypesformonitoringluciliacuprinaandluciliasericatainnewzealand AT pomroywilliam fieldevaluationofthelucitrapandthewesternaustraliantrapwiththreedifferentbaitstypesformonitoringluciliacuprinaandluciliasericatainnewzealand |