Cargando…

A Field Evaluation of the LuciTrap and the Western Australian Trap with Three Different Baits Types for Monitoring Lucilia cuprina and Lucilia sericata in New Zealand

SIMPLE SUMMARY: In New Zealand, flystrike is caused by two Dipteran species, Lucilia cuprina and Lucilia sericata. This study contrasts four flytrap treatments, the LuciTrap with its combination of three chemical lures (Lucilures) and the Western Australian Trap with three different bait types (Luci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brett, Paul, Lawrence, Kevin, Kenyon, Paul, Gedye, Kristene, Pomroy, William
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8470412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34564269
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects12090829
_version_ 1784574192614637568
author Brett, Paul
Lawrence, Kevin
Kenyon, Paul
Gedye, Kristene
Pomroy, William
author_facet Brett, Paul
Lawrence, Kevin
Kenyon, Paul
Gedye, Kristene
Pomroy, William
author_sort Brett, Paul
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: In New Zealand, flystrike is caused by two Dipteran species, Lucilia cuprina and Lucilia sericata. This study contrasts four flytrap treatments, the LuciTrap with its combination of three chemical lures (Lucilures) and the Western Australian Trap with three different bait types (LuciLure, Sheep liver with 30% sodium sulphide and squid) during mid-summer. The aim of the study is to assess the most effective trap and bait combination that New Zealand farmers may use on their farms to monitor L. cuprina and L. sericata. This study found that either the LuciTrap or the Western Australian Trap with sheep liver and 30% sodium sulphide were the most effective traps to catch L. cuprina and L. sericata. ABSTRACT: Flytraps can be used on farms to monitor the populations of primary strike flies (Lucilia cuprina and Lucilia sericata) and, hence, offer a view regarding the incidence of flystrike on sheep. This study aimed to contrast the specificity and effectiveness of the LuciTrap with its combination of three chemical lures (Lucilures) and the Western Australian Trap with three bait types (LuciLure, Sheep liver with 30% sodium sulphide and squid). A mean model and rate model were fitted to the data. The mean model showed no difference (p > 0.05) in the mean weekly catch for L. cuprina between the Western Australian Trap with LuciLures and the Western Australian Trap baited with sheep liver with 30% sodium sulphide (p < 0.05). Whereas, for L. sericata, no difference (p > 0.05) was found between the Western Australian Trap with LuciLures, the Western Australian Trap baited with sheep liver with 30% sodium sulphide and the LuciTrap. The rate model illustrated that the Western Australian Trap with sheep liver with 30% sodium sulphide and LuciTrap did not differ (p > 0.05) for L. cuprina and L. sericata. Combined, these results indicate that New Zealand farmers can use either the LuciTrap or the Western Australian Trap with sheep liver with 30% sodium sulphide to monitor these target species.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8470412
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84704122021-09-27 A Field Evaluation of the LuciTrap and the Western Australian Trap with Three Different Baits Types for Monitoring Lucilia cuprina and Lucilia sericata in New Zealand Brett, Paul Lawrence, Kevin Kenyon, Paul Gedye, Kristene Pomroy, William Insects Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: In New Zealand, flystrike is caused by two Dipteran species, Lucilia cuprina and Lucilia sericata. This study contrasts four flytrap treatments, the LuciTrap with its combination of three chemical lures (Lucilures) and the Western Australian Trap with three different bait types (LuciLure, Sheep liver with 30% sodium sulphide and squid) during mid-summer. The aim of the study is to assess the most effective trap and bait combination that New Zealand farmers may use on their farms to monitor L. cuprina and L. sericata. This study found that either the LuciTrap or the Western Australian Trap with sheep liver and 30% sodium sulphide were the most effective traps to catch L. cuprina and L. sericata. ABSTRACT: Flytraps can be used on farms to monitor the populations of primary strike flies (Lucilia cuprina and Lucilia sericata) and, hence, offer a view regarding the incidence of flystrike on sheep. This study aimed to contrast the specificity and effectiveness of the LuciTrap with its combination of three chemical lures (Lucilures) and the Western Australian Trap with three bait types (LuciLure, Sheep liver with 30% sodium sulphide and squid). A mean model and rate model were fitted to the data. The mean model showed no difference (p > 0.05) in the mean weekly catch for L. cuprina between the Western Australian Trap with LuciLures and the Western Australian Trap baited with sheep liver with 30% sodium sulphide (p < 0.05). Whereas, for L. sericata, no difference (p > 0.05) was found between the Western Australian Trap with LuciLures, the Western Australian Trap baited with sheep liver with 30% sodium sulphide and the LuciTrap. The rate model illustrated that the Western Australian Trap with sheep liver with 30% sodium sulphide and LuciTrap did not differ (p > 0.05) for L. cuprina and L. sericata. Combined, these results indicate that New Zealand farmers can use either the LuciTrap or the Western Australian Trap with sheep liver with 30% sodium sulphide to monitor these target species. MDPI 2021-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8470412/ /pubmed/34564269 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects12090829 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Brett, Paul
Lawrence, Kevin
Kenyon, Paul
Gedye, Kristene
Pomroy, William
A Field Evaluation of the LuciTrap and the Western Australian Trap with Three Different Baits Types for Monitoring Lucilia cuprina and Lucilia sericata in New Zealand
title A Field Evaluation of the LuciTrap and the Western Australian Trap with Three Different Baits Types for Monitoring Lucilia cuprina and Lucilia sericata in New Zealand
title_full A Field Evaluation of the LuciTrap and the Western Australian Trap with Three Different Baits Types for Monitoring Lucilia cuprina and Lucilia sericata in New Zealand
title_fullStr A Field Evaluation of the LuciTrap and the Western Australian Trap with Three Different Baits Types for Monitoring Lucilia cuprina and Lucilia sericata in New Zealand
title_full_unstemmed A Field Evaluation of the LuciTrap and the Western Australian Trap with Three Different Baits Types for Monitoring Lucilia cuprina and Lucilia sericata in New Zealand
title_short A Field Evaluation of the LuciTrap and the Western Australian Trap with Three Different Baits Types for Monitoring Lucilia cuprina and Lucilia sericata in New Zealand
title_sort field evaluation of the lucitrap and the western australian trap with three different baits types for monitoring lucilia cuprina and lucilia sericata in new zealand
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8470412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34564269
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects12090829
work_keys_str_mv AT brettpaul afieldevaluationofthelucitrapandthewesternaustraliantrapwiththreedifferentbaitstypesformonitoringluciliacuprinaandluciliasericatainnewzealand
AT lawrencekevin afieldevaluationofthelucitrapandthewesternaustraliantrapwiththreedifferentbaitstypesformonitoringluciliacuprinaandluciliasericatainnewzealand
AT kenyonpaul afieldevaluationofthelucitrapandthewesternaustraliantrapwiththreedifferentbaitstypesformonitoringluciliacuprinaandluciliasericatainnewzealand
AT gedyekristene afieldevaluationofthelucitrapandthewesternaustraliantrapwiththreedifferentbaitstypesformonitoringluciliacuprinaandluciliasericatainnewzealand
AT pomroywilliam afieldevaluationofthelucitrapandthewesternaustraliantrapwiththreedifferentbaitstypesformonitoringluciliacuprinaandluciliasericatainnewzealand
AT brettpaul fieldevaluationofthelucitrapandthewesternaustraliantrapwiththreedifferentbaitstypesformonitoringluciliacuprinaandluciliasericatainnewzealand
AT lawrencekevin fieldevaluationofthelucitrapandthewesternaustraliantrapwiththreedifferentbaitstypesformonitoringluciliacuprinaandluciliasericatainnewzealand
AT kenyonpaul fieldevaluationofthelucitrapandthewesternaustraliantrapwiththreedifferentbaitstypesformonitoringluciliacuprinaandluciliasericatainnewzealand
AT gedyekristene fieldevaluationofthelucitrapandthewesternaustraliantrapwiththreedifferentbaitstypesformonitoringluciliacuprinaandluciliasericatainnewzealand
AT pomroywilliam fieldevaluationofthelucitrapandthewesternaustraliantrapwiththreedifferentbaitstypesformonitoringluciliacuprinaandluciliasericatainnewzealand