Cargando…
Evaluation of Two Methods (Inside-Out/Outside-In) Inferior Articular Process Resection for Uniportal Full Endoscopic Posterolateral Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technical Note
Objective: There is limited literature comparing the uniportal full endoscopic posterolateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion outside-in approach (ETLIF (O)) with the inside-out approach (ETLIF (I)). Methods: Radiological evaluation was performed on disc height restoration and coronal wedging...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8470686/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34573190 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11091169 |
_version_ | 1784574263768907776 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Hyeun-Sung Wu, Pang-Hung An, Jin-Woo Lee, Yeon-Jin Lee, Jun-Hyung Kim, Myeong-Hun Lee, Inkyung Park, Jong-Sung Lee, Jun-Hyung Park, Jun-Hwan Jang, Il-Tae |
author_facet | Kim, Hyeun-Sung Wu, Pang-Hung An, Jin-Woo Lee, Yeon-Jin Lee, Jun-Hyung Kim, Myeong-Hun Lee, Inkyung Park, Jong-Sung Lee, Jun-Hyung Park, Jun-Hwan Jang, Il-Tae |
author_sort | Kim, Hyeun-Sung |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: There is limited literature comparing the uniportal full endoscopic posterolateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion outside-in approach (ETLIF (O)) with the inside-out approach (ETLIF (I)). Methods: Radiological evaluation was performed on disc height restoration and coronal wedging angle, and operation time (inferior articular process resection time/total operation time) and clinical evaluation were made. Result: 48 cases of inside-out and 38 cases of outside-in cases were included. Compared to inside-out, the outside-in approach had significantly less operative time required to resect inferior articular process: 36.55 ± 10.37, and total operative time: 87.45 ± 20.14 min compared to 49.83 ± 23.97 and 102.56 ± 36.53 min, respectively, for the inside-out approach, p < 0.05. Compared to the preoperative state, both cohorts achieved significant improvement of VAS and ODI at post-operative 1 week, 3 months and at final follow up. Both cohorts achieved statistically significant increased disc height with 5.00 ± 2.87 mm, 5.49 ± 2.33 mm and statistically significant improvement in coronal wedge angle with 1.76 ± 1.63°, 3.24 ± 2.92° in the inside-out and outside-in approaches respectively. Conclusions: Complete removal of inferior articular process is the key part of endoscopic fusion with two methods that can be applied: an inside-out approach or an outside-in approach. Comparing both techniques, the outside-in approach has a shorter operative time required for inferior articular process resection and total length of operation with similar good clinical and radiological outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8470686 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84706862021-09-27 Evaluation of Two Methods (Inside-Out/Outside-In) Inferior Articular Process Resection for Uniportal Full Endoscopic Posterolateral Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technical Note Kim, Hyeun-Sung Wu, Pang-Hung An, Jin-Woo Lee, Yeon-Jin Lee, Jun-Hyung Kim, Myeong-Hun Lee, Inkyung Park, Jong-Sung Lee, Jun-Hyung Park, Jun-Hwan Jang, Il-Tae Brain Sci Article Objective: There is limited literature comparing the uniportal full endoscopic posterolateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion outside-in approach (ETLIF (O)) with the inside-out approach (ETLIF (I)). Methods: Radiological evaluation was performed on disc height restoration and coronal wedging angle, and operation time (inferior articular process resection time/total operation time) and clinical evaluation were made. Result: 48 cases of inside-out and 38 cases of outside-in cases were included. Compared to inside-out, the outside-in approach had significantly less operative time required to resect inferior articular process: 36.55 ± 10.37, and total operative time: 87.45 ± 20.14 min compared to 49.83 ± 23.97 and 102.56 ± 36.53 min, respectively, for the inside-out approach, p < 0.05. Compared to the preoperative state, both cohorts achieved significant improvement of VAS and ODI at post-operative 1 week, 3 months and at final follow up. Both cohorts achieved statistically significant increased disc height with 5.00 ± 2.87 mm, 5.49 ± 2.33 mm and statistically significant improvement in coronal wedge angle with 1.76 ± 1.63°, 3.24 ± 2.92° in the inside-out and outside-in approaches respectively. Conclusions: Complete removal of inferior articular process is the key part of endoscopic fusion with two methods that can be applied: an inside-out approach or an outside-in approach. Comparing both techniques, the outside-in approach has a shorter operative time required for inferior articular process resection and total length of operation with similar good clinical and radiological outcomes. MDPI 2021-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8470686/ /pubmed/34573190 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11091169 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Kim, Hyeun-Sung Wu, Pang-Hung An, Jin-Woo Lee, Yeon-Jin Lee, Jun-Hyung Kim, Myeong-Hun Lee, Inkyung Park, Jong-Sung Lee, Jun-Hyung Park, Jun-Hwan Jang, Il-Tae Evaluation of Two Methods (Inside-Out/Outside-In) Inferior Articular Process Resection for Uniportal Full Endoscopic Posterolateral Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technical Note |
title | Evaluation of Two Methods (Inside-Out/Outside-In) Inferior Articular Process Resection for Uniportal Full Endoscopic Posterolateral Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technical Note |
title_full | Evaluation of Two Methods (Inside-Out/Outside-In) Inferior Articular Process Resection for Uniportal Full Endoscopic Posterolateral Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technical Note |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Two Methods (Inside-Out/Outside-In) Inferior Articular Process Resection for Uniportal Full Endoscopic Posterolateral Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technical Note |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Two Methods (Inside-Out/Outside-In) Inferior Articular Process Resection for Uniportal Full Endoscopic Posterolateral Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technical Note |
title_short | Evaluation of Two Methods (Inside-Out/Outside-In) Inferior Articular Process Resection for Uniportal Full Endoscopic Posterolateral Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technical Note |
title_sort | evaluation of two methods (inside-out/outside-in) inferior articular process resection for uniportal full endoscopic posterolateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: technical note |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8470686/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34573190 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11091169 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimhyeunsung evaluationoftwomethodsinsideoutoutsideininferiorarticularprocessresectionforuniportalfullendoscopicposterolateraltransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusiontechnicalnote AT wupanghung evaluationoftwomethodsinsideoutoutsideininferiorarticularprocessresectionforuniportalfullendoscopicposterolateraltransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusiontechnicalnote AT anjinwoo evaluationoftwomethodsinsideoutoutsideininferiorarticularprocessresectionforuniportalfullendoscopicposterolateraltransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusiontechnicalnote AT leeyeonjin evaluationoftwomethodsinsideoutoutsideininferiorarticularprocessresectionforuniportalfullendoscopicposterolateraltransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusiontechnicalnote AT leejunhyung evaluationoftwomethodsinsideoutoutsideininferiorarticularprocessresectionforuniportalfullendoscopicposterolateraltransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusiontechnicalnote AT kimmyeonghun evaluationoftwomethodsinsideoutoutsideininferiorarticularprocessresectionforuniportalfullendoscopicposterolateraltransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusiontechnicalnote AT leeinkyung evaluationoftwomethodsinsideoutoutsideininferiorarticularprocessresectionforuniportalfullendoscopicposterolateraltransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusiontechnicalnote AT parkjongsung evaluationoftwomethodsinsideoutoutsideininferiorarticularprocessresectionforuniportalfullendoscopicposterolateraltransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusiontechnicalnote AT leejunhyung evaluationoftwomethodsinsideoutoutsideininferiorarticularprocessresectionforuniportalfullendoscopicposterolateraltransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusiontechnicalnote AT parkjunhwan evaluationoftwomethodsinsideoutoutsideininferiorarticularprocessresectionforuniportalfullendoscopicposterolateraltransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusiontechnicalnote AT jangiltae evaluationoftwomethodsinsideoutoutsideininferiorarticularprocessresectionforuniportalfullendoscopicposterolateraltransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusiontechnicalnote |