Cargando…
Body Mass Index Showed No Impact on the Outcome of In Vitro Fertilization in Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol
PURPOSE: To assess whether body mass index (BMI) affects the outcome of in vitro fertilization (IVF) in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in the Reproductive Medicine Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, from June 2016 to June...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8470839/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34584537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9979972 |
_version_ | 1784574302810537984 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Zhe Zhao, Xuehan Hu, Xue Ou, Xiangyang Yin, Tailang Yang, Jing Wu, Gengxiang |
author_facet | Yang, Zhe Zhao, Xuehan Hu, Xue Ou, Xiangyang Yin, Tailang Yang, Jing Wu, Gengxiang |
author_sort | Yang, Zhe |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To assess whether body mass index (BMI) affects the outcome of in vitro fertilization (IVF) in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in the Reproductive Medicine Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, from June 2016 to June 2017. 636 infertile women who received PPOS protocol in IVF treatment were divided into three groups according to BMI. The data of basic characteristics, embryological outcomes, and cycle characteristics of controlled ovarian stimulation of different groups were collected and studied. Result(s). There was no significant difference in almost all the basic characteristics, embryological outcomes of controlled ovarian stimulation, and cycle characteristics of controlled ovarian stimulation among the three groups. There was a tendency that the duration of infertility was decreased with the increase of patients' weight, although there was no significant difference (P=0.051). However, overweight patients had a higher fertilization rate than normal weight patients and underweight patients (70.3 vs. 67.7 vs. 66.8, P=0.008), but two-pronuclei (2PN) fertilization rate and cleavage rate showed no significant difference among the three groups. Conclusion(s). BMI showed no impact on the outcome of the ovarian stimulation outcome in PPOS protocol. PPOS protocol may benefit overweight patients, for it attains the same effect with normal patients and requires no increase in gonadotropin (Gn) dose and Gn duration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8470839 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84708392021-09-27 Body Mass Index Showed No Impact on the Outcome of In Vitro Fertilization in Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol Yang, Zhe Zhao, Xuehan Hu, Xue Ou, Xiangyang Yin, Tailang Yang, Jing Wu, Gengxiang Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Research Article PURPOSE: To assess whether body mass index (BMI) affects the outcome of in vitro fertilization (IVF) in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in the Reproductive Medicine Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, from June 2016 to June 2017. 636 infertile women who received PPOS protocol in IVF treatment were divided into three groups according to BMI. The data of basic characteristics, embryological outcomes, and cycle characteristics of controlled ovarian stimulation of different groups were collected and studied. Result(s). There was no significant difference in almost all the basic characteristics, embryological outcomes of controlled ovarian stimulation, and cycle characteristics of controlled ovarian stimulation among the three groups. There was a tendency that the duration of infertility was decreased with the increase of patients' weight, although there was no significant difference (P=0.051). However, overweight patients had a higher fertilization rate than normal weight patients and underweight patients (70.3 vs. 67.7 vs. 66.8, P=0.008), but two-pronuclei (2PN) fertilization rate and cleavage rate showed no significant difference among the three groups. Conclusion(s). BMI showed no impact on the outcome of the ovarian stimulation outcome in PPOS protocol. PPOS protocol may benefit overweight patients, for it attains the same effect with normal patients and requires no increase in gonadotropin (Gn) dose and Gn duration. Hindawi 2021-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8470839/ /pubmed/34584537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9979972 Text en Copyright © 2021 Zhe Yang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Yang, Zhe Zhao, Xuehan Hu, Xue Ou, Xiangyang Yin, Tailang Yang, Jing Wu, Gengxiang Body Mass Index Showed No Impact on the Outcome of In Vitro Fertilization in Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol |
title | Body Mass Index Showed No Impact on the Outcome of In Vitro Fertilization in Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol |
title_full | Body Mass Index Showed No Impact on the Outcome of In Vitro Fertilization in Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol |
title_fullStr | Body Mass Index Showed No Impact on the Outcome of In Vitro Fertilization in Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Body Mass Index Showed No Impact on the Outcome of In Vitro Fertilization in Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol |
title_short | Body Mass Index Showed No Impact on the Outcome of In Vitro Fertilization in Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol |
title_sort | body mass index showed no impact on the outcome of in vitro fertilization in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8470839/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34584537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9979972 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yangzhe bodymassindexshowednoimpactontheoutcomeofinvitrofertilizationinprogestinprimedovarianstimulationprotocol AT zhaoxuehan bodymassindexshowednoimpactontheoutcomeofinvitrofertilizationinprogestinprimedovarianstimulationprotocol AT huxue bodymassindexshowednoimpactontheoutcomeofinvitrofertilizationinprogestinprimedovarianstimulationprotocol AT ouxiangyang bodymassindexshowednoimpactontheoutcomeofinvitrofertilizationinprogestinprimedovarianstimulationprotocol AT yintailang bodymassindexshowednoimpactontheoutcomeofinvitrofertilizationinprogestinprimedovarianstimulationprotocol AT yangjing bodymassindexshowednoimpactontheoutcomeofinvitrofertilizationinprogestinprimedovarianstimulationprotocol AT wugengxiang bodymassindexshowednoimpactontheoutcomeofinvitrofertilizationinprogestinprimedovarianstimulationprotocol |