Cargando…

Body Mass Index Showed No Impact on the Outcome of In Vitro Fertilization in Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol

PURPOSE: To assess whether body mass index (BMI) affects the outcome of in vitro fertilization (IVF) in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in the Reproductive Medicine Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, from June 2016 to June...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Zhe, Zhao, Xuehan, Hu, Xue, Ou, Xiangyang, Yin, Tailang, Yang, Jing, Wu, Gengxiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8470839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34584537
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9979972
_version_ 1784574302810537984
author Yang, Zhe
Zhao, Xuehan
Hu, Xue
Ou, Xiangyang
Yin, Tailang
Yang, Jing
Wu, Gengxiang
author_facet Yang, Zhe
Zhao, Xuehan
Hu, Xue
Ou, Xiangyang
Yin, Tailang
Yang, Jing
Wu, Gengxiang
author_sort Yang, Zhe
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To assess whether body mass index (BMI) affects the outcome of in vitro fertilization (IVF) in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in the Reproductive Medicine Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, from June 2016 to June 2017. 636 infertile women who received PPOS protocol in IVF treatment were divided into three groups according to BMI. The data of basic characteristics, embryological outcomes, and cycle characteristics of controlled ovarian stimulation of different groups were collected and studied. Result(s). There was no significant difference in almost all the basic characteristics, embryological outcomes of controlled ovarian stimulation, and cycle characteristics of controlled ovarian stimulation among the three groups. There was a tendency that the duration of infertility was decreased with the increase of patients' weight, although there was no significant difference (P=0.051). However, overweight patients had a higher fertilization rate than normal weight patients and underweight patients (70.3 vs. 67.7 vs. 66.8, P=0.008), but two-pronuclei (2PN) fertilization rate and cleavage rate showed no significant difference among the three groups. Conclusion(s). BMI showed no impact on the outcome of the ovarian stimulation outcome in PPOS protocol. PPOS protocol may benefit overweight patients, for it attains the same effect with normal patients and requires no increase in gonadotropin (Gn) dose and Gn duration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8470839
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84708392021-09-27 Body Mass Index Showed No Impact on the Outcome of In Vitro Fertilization in Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol Yang, Zhe Zhao, Xuehan Hu, Xue Ou, Xiangyang Yin, Tailang Yang, Jing Wu, Gengxiang Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Research Article PURPOSE: To assess whether body mass index (BMI) affects the outcome of in vitro fertilization (IVF) in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in the Reproductive Medicine Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, from June 2016 to June 2017. 636 infertile women who received PPOS protocol in IVF treatment were divided into three groups according to BMI. The data of basic characteristics, embryological outcomes, and cycle characteristics of controlled ovarian stimulation of different groups were collected and studied. Result(s). There was no significant difference in almost all the basic characteristics, embryological outcomes of controlled ovarian stimulation, and cycle characteristics of controlled ovarian stimulation among the three groups. There was a tendency that the duration of infertility was decreased with the increase of patients' weight, although there was no significant difference (P=0.051). However, overweight patients had a higher fertilization rate than normal weight patients and underweight patients (70.3 vs. 67.7 vs. 66.8, P=0.008), but two-pronuclei (2PN) fertilization rate and cleavage rate showed no significant difference among the three groups. Conclusion(s). BMI showed no impact on the outcome of the ovarian stimulation outcome in PPOS protocol. PPOS protocol may benefit overweight patients, for it attains the same effect with normal patients and requires no increase in gonadotropin (Gn) dose and Gn duration. Hindawi 2021-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8470839/ /pubmed/34584537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9979972 Text en Copyright © 2021 Zhe Yang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yang, Zhe
Zhao, Xuehan
Hu, Xue
Ou, Xiangyang
Yin, Tailang
Yang, Jing
Wu, Gengxiang
Body Mass Index Showed No Impact on the Outcome of In Vitro Fertilization in Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol
title Body Mass Index Showed No Impact on the Outcome of In Vitro Fertilization in Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol
title_full Body Mass Index Showed No Impact on the Outcome of In Vitro Fertilization in Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol
title_fullStr Body Mass Index Showed No Impact on the Outcome of In Vitro Fertilization in Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol
title_full_unstemmed Body Mass Index Showed No Impact on the Outcome of In Vitro Fertilization in Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol
title_short Body Mass Index Showed No Impact on the Outcome of In Vitro Fertilization in Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol
title_sort body mass index showed no impact on the outcome of in vitro fertilization in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8470839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34584537
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9979972
work_keys_str_mv AT yangzhe bodymassindexshowednoimpactontheoutcomeofinvitrofertilizationinprogestinprimedovarianstimulationprotocol
AT zhaoxuehan bodymassindexshowednoimpactontheoutcomeofinvitrofertilizationinprogestinprimedovarianstimulationprotocol
AT huxue bodymassindexshowednoimpactontheoutcomeofinvitrofertilizationinprogestinprimedovarianstimulationprotocol
AT ouxiangyang bodymassindexshowednoimpactontheoutcomeofinvitrofertilizationinprogestinprimedovarianstimulationprotocol
AT yintailang bodymassindexshowednoimpactontheoutcomeofinvitrofertilizationinprogestinprimedovarianstimulationprotocol
AT yangjing bodymassindexshowednoimpactontheoutcomeofinvitrofertilizationinprogestinprimedovarianstimulationprotocol
AT wugengxiang bodymassindexshowednoimpactontheoutcomeofinvitrofertilizationinprogestinprimedovarianstimulationprotocol