Cargando…

Validation of the Relationships Questionnaire (RQ) against the Experience of Close Relationship-Revised Questionnaire in a Clinical Psychiatric Sample

Background: The Relationship Questionnaire (RQ) is a commonly used self-reporting questionnaire used to measure adult attachment styles. The RQ has two parts. RQ1, a single item where individuals have to indicate their preferred relationship style, and RQ2, where individuals can rate their relations...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wongpakaran, Nahathai, DeMaranville, Justin, Wongpakaran, Tinakon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8470855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34574948
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9091174
_version_ 1784574306905227264
author Wongpakaran, Nahathai
DeMaranville, Justin
Wongpakaran, Tinakon
author_facet Wongpakaran, Nahathai
DeMaranville, Justin
Wongpakaran, Tinakon
author_sort Wongpakaran, Nahathai
collection PubMed
description Background: The Relationship Questionnaire (RQ) is a commonly used self-reporting questionnaire used to measure adult attachment styles. The RQ has two parts. RQ1, a single item where individuals have to indicate their preferred relationship style, and RQ2, where individuals can rate their relationship style in more detail using four different scales. Agreement is expected between the highest levels selected and the style chosen in RQ1. An advantage of the RQ is its brevity, whereas a disadvantage is that it constitutes a single item. A validation of RQ has not been clearly demonstrated, even though it has convergent validity in relation to other measurements in this area. Methods: 168 patients completed the RQ, the short version of the Experience in Close Relationships (Revised) questionnaire (ECR-R), and scales of depression and interpersonal problems. Regression analysis was conducted to examine the congruity in regard to attachment theory. Results: ratings from 15.5% of the patients showed disagreement between RQ1 and RQ2. Each type of attachment measured by the RQ was predicted by the ECR-R scores, as hypothesized. In the predictive analysis of depression and interpersonal problems, both RQ dimensions and ECR-R scores were coherent. Conclusions: RQ is a valid self-reported measurement that can be applied clinically on the condition that the rater identifies an agreement between RQ1 and RQ2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8470855
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84708552021-09-27 Validation of the Relationships Questionnaire (RQ) against the Experience of Close Relationship-Revised Questionnaire in a Clinical Psychiatric Sample Wongpakaran, Nahathai DeMaranville, Justin Wongpakaran, Tinakon Healthcare (Basel) Article Background: The Relationship Questionnaire (RQ) is a commonly used self-reporting questionnaire used to measure adult attachment styles. The RQ has two parts. RQ1, a single item where individuals have to indicate their preferred relationship style, and RQ2, where individuals can rate their relationship style in more detail using four different scales. Agreement is expected between the highest levels selected and the style chosen in RQ1. An advantage of the RQ is its brevity, whereas a disadvantage is that it constitutes a single item. A validation of RQ has not been clearly demonstrated, even though it has convergent validity in relation to other measurements in this area. Methods: 168 patients completed the RQ, the short version of the Experience in Close Relationships (Revised) questionnaire (ECR-R), and scales of depression and interpersonal problems. Regression analysis was conducted to examine the congruity in regard to attachment theory. Results: ratings from 15.5% of the patients showed disagreement between RQ1 and RQ2. Each type of attachment measured by the RQ was predicted by the ECR-R scores, as hypothesized. In the predictive analysis of depression and interpersonal problems, both RQ dimensions and ECR-R scores were coherent. Conclusions: RQ is a valid self-reported measurement that can be applied clinically on the condition that the rater identifies an agreement between RQ1 and RQ2. MDPI 2021-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8470855/ /pubmed/34574948 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9091174 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wongpakaran, Nahathai
DeMaranville, Justin
Wongpakaran, Tinakon
Validation of the Relationships Questionnaire (RQ) against the Experience of Close Relationship-Revised Questionnaire in a Clinical Psychiatric Sample
title Validation of the Relationships Questionnaire (RQ) against the Experience of Close Relationship-Revised Questionnaire in a Clinical Psychiatric Sample
title_full Validation of the Relationships Questionnaire (RQ) against the Experience of Close Relationship-Revised Questionnaire in a Clinical Psychiatric Sample
title_fullStr Validation of the Relationships Questionnaire (RQ) against the Experience of Close Relationship-Revised Questionnaire in a Clinical Psychiatric Sample
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the Relationships Questionnaire (RQ) against the Experience of Close Relationship-Revised Questionnaire in a Clinical Psychiatric Sample
title_short Validation of the Relationships Questionnaire (RQ) against the Experience of Close Relationship-Revised Questionnaire in a Clinical Psychiatric Sample
title_sort validation of the relationships questionnaire (rq) against the experience of close relationship-revised questionnaire in a clinical psychiatric sample
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8470855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34574948
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9091174
work_keys_str_mv AT wongpakarannahathai validationoftherelationshipsquestionnairerqagainsttheexperienceofcloserelationshiprevisedquestionnaireinaclinicalpsychiatricsample
AT demaranvillejustin validationoftherelationshipsquestionnairerqagainsttheexperienceofcloserelationshiprevisedquestionnaireinaclinicalpsychiatricsample
AT wongpakarantinakon validationoftherelationshipsquestionnairerqagainsttheexperienceofcloserelationshiprevisedquestionnaireinaclinicalpsychiatricsample