Cargando…

Re-Establishment Techniques and Transplantations of Charophytes to Support Threatened Species

Re-establishment of submerged macrophytes and especially charophyte vegetation is a common aim in lake management. If revegetation does not happen spontaneously, transplantations may be a suitable option. Only rarely have transplantations been used as a tool to support threatened submerged macrophyt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blindow, Irmgard, Carlsson, Maria, van de Weyer, Klaus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8470995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34579363
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants10091830
_version_ 1784574344187346944
author Blindow, Irmgard
Carlsson, Maria
van de Weyer, Klaus
author_facet Blindow, Irmgard
Carlsson, Maria
van de Weyer, Klaus
author_sort Blindow, Irmgard
collection PubMed
description Re-establishment of submerged macrophytes and especially charophyte vegetation is a common aim in lake management. If revegetation does not happen spontaneously, transplantations may be a suitable option. Only rarely have transplantations been used as a tool to support threatened submerged macrophytes and, to a much lesser extent, charophytes. Such actions have to consider species-specific life strategies. K-strategists mainly inhabit permanent habitats, are perennial, have low fertility and poor dispersal ability, but are strong competitors and often form dense vegetation. R-strategists are annual species, inhabit shallow water and/or temporary habitats, and are richly fertile. They disperse easily but are weak competitors. While K-strategists easily can be planted as green biomass taken from another site, rare R-strategists often must be reproduced in cultures before they can be planted on-site. In Sweden, several charophyte species are extremely rare and fail to (re)establish, though apparently suitable habitats are available. Limited dispersal and/or lack of diaspore reservoirs are probable explanations. Transplantations are planned to secure the occurrences of these species in the country. This contribution reviews the knowledge on life forms, dispersal, establishment, and transplantations of submerged macrophytes with focus on charophytes and gives recommendations for the Swedish project.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8470995
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84709952021-09-27 Re-Establishment Techniques and Transplantations of Charophytes to Support Threatened Species Blindow, Irmgard Carlsson, Maria van de Weyer, Klaus Plants (Basel) Review Re-establishment of submerged macrophytes and especially charophyte vegetation is a common aim in lake management. If revegetation does not happen spontaneously, transplantations may be a suitable option. Only rarely have transplantations been used as a tool to support threatened submerged macrophytes and, to a much lesser extent, charophytes. Such actions have to consider species-specific life strategies. K-strategists mainly inhabit permanent habitats, are perennial, have low fertility and poor dispersal ability, but are strong competitors and often form dense vegetation. R-strategists are annual species, inhabit shallow water and/or temporary habitats, and are richly fertile. They disperse easily but are weak competitors. While K-strategists easily can be planted as green biomass taken from another site, rare R-strategists often must be reproduced in cultures before they can be planted on-site. In Sweden, several charophyte species are extremely rare and fail to (re)establish, though apparently suitable habitats are available. Limited dispersal and/or lack of diaspore reservoirs are probable explanations. Transplantations are planned to secure the occurrences of these species in the country. This contribution reviews the knowledge on life forms, dispersal, establishment, and transplantations of submerged macrophytes with focus on charophytes and gives recommendations for the Swedish project. MDPI 2021-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8470995/ /pubmed/34579363 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants10091830 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Blindow, Irmgard
Carlsson, Maria
van de Weyer, Klaus
Re-Establishment Techniques and Transplantations of Charophytes to Support Threatened Species
title Re-Establishment Techniques and Transplantations of Charophytes to Support Threatened Species
title_full Re-Establishment Techniques and Transplantations of Charophytes to Support Threatened Species
title_fullStr Re-Establishment Techniques and Transplantations of Charophytes to Support Threatened Species
title_full_unstemmed Re-Establishment Techniques and Transplantations of Charophytes to Support Threatened Species
title_short Re-Establishment Techniques and Transplantations of Charophytes to Support Threatened Species
title_sort re-establishment techniques and transplantations of charophytes to support threatened species
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8470995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34579363
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants10091830
work_keys_str_mv AT blindowirmgard reestablishmenttechniquesandtransplantationsofcharophytestosupportthreatenedspecies
AT carlssonmaria reestablishmenttechniquesandtransplantationsofcharophytestosupportthreatenedspecies
AT vandeweyerklaus reestablishmenttechniquesandtransplantationsofcharophytestosupportthreatenedspecies