Cargando…
Comparison between an Emerging Point-of-Care Tool for TSH Evaluation and a Centralized Laboratory-Based Method in a Cohort of Patients from Southern Italy
Endocrine and metabolic disorders are a common condition in Europe and worldwide, and, among these, thyroid dysfunction still remains a problem. The measurement of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) levels represents the first-line assay for the assessment of thyroid function. In the present study, w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8471571/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34573932 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091590 |
_version_ | 1784574501188534272 |
---|---|
author | Di Cerbo, Alfredo Quagliano, Nazario Napolitano, Antonella Pezzuto, Federica Iannitti, Tommaso Di Cerbo, Alessandro |
author_facet | Di Cerbo, Alfredo Quagliano, Nazario Napolitano, Antonella Pezzuto, Federica Iannitti, Tommaso Di Cerbo, Alessandro |
author_sort | Di Cerbo, Alfredo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Endocrine and metabolic disorders are a common condition in Europe and worldwide, and, among these, thyroid dysfunction still remains a problem. The measurement of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) levels represents the first-line assay for the assessment of thyroid function. In the present study, we compared serum concentrations of TSH, measured using a commercially available point-of-care test (POCT) method (FastPack(®) IP) and an established “conventional” laboratory-based method (Beckmann Access 2) in a cohort of patients from Foggia in Southern Italy. A strong correlation (r = 0.994) was found between both methods and was also confirmed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis (0.82). The within-run coefficient of variation (CV) using FastPack(®) ranged from 4.03% and 8.57% at the TSH concentrations of 39.49 and 0.70 mIU/L, respectively. The between-run CV was 10.34% and 6.33% at the TSH concentrations of 0.87 and 26.55 mIU/L, respectively. The ratios of within- to between-assay CV were 0.83 and 1.06 at the TSH levels of 0.70 and 52.59 mIU/mL, respectively. In this study, we showed that serum TSH levels can be measured in a few minutes and at low-cost in terms of materials and equipment required. We observed that this approach is user-friendly, accurate, reproducible, and suitable for use in the clinic, while also meeting the criteria for effectiveness, impact, efficiency, and sustainability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8471571 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84715712021-09-28 Comparison between an Emerging Point-of-Care Tool for TSH Evaluation and a Centralized Laboratory-Based Method in a Cohort of Patients from Southern Italy Di Cerbo, Alfredo Quagliano, Nazario Napolitano, Antonella Pezzuto, Federica Iannitti, Tommaso Di Cerbo, Alessandro Diagnostics (Basel) Article Endocrine and metabolic disorders are a common condition in Europe and worldwide, and, among these, thyroid dysfunction still remains a problem. The measurement of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) levels represents the first-line assay for the assessment of thyroid function. In the present study, we compared serum concentrations of TSH, measured using a commercially available point-of-care test (POCT) method (FastPack(®) IP) and an established “conventional” laboratory-based method (Beckmann Access 2) in a cohort of patients from Foggia in Southern Italy. A strong correlation (r = 0.994) was found between both methods and was also confirmed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis (0.82). The within-run coefficient of variation (CV) using FastPack(®) ranged from 4.03% and 8.57% at the TSH concentrations of 39.49 and 0.70 mIU/L, respectively. The between-run CV was 10.34% and 6.33% at the TSH concentrations of 0.87 and 26.55 mIU/L, respectively. The ratios of within- to between-assay CV were 0.83 and 1.06 at the TSH levels of 0.70 and 52.59 mIU/mL, respectively. In this study, we showed that serum TSH levels can be measured in a few minutes and at low-cost in terms of materials and equipment required. We observed that this approach is user-friendly, accurate, reproducible, and suitable for use in the clinic, while also meeting the criteria for effectiveness, impact, efficiency, and sustainability. MDPI 2021-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8471571/ /pubmed/34573932 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091590 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Di Cerbo, Alfredo Quagliano, Nazario Napolitano, Antonella Pezzuto, Federica Iannitti, Tommaso Di Cerbo, Alessandro Comparison between an Emerging Point-of-Care Tool for TSH Evaluation and a Centralized Laboratory-Based Method in a Cohort of Patients from Southern Italy |
title | Comparison between an Emerging Point-of-Care Tool for TSH Evaluation and a Centralized Laboratory-Based Method in a Cohort of Patients from Southern Italy |
title_full | Comparison between an Emerging Point-of-Care Tool for TSH Evaluation and a Centralized Laboratory-Based Method in a Cohort of Patients from Southern Italy |
title_fullStr | Comparison between an Emerging Point-of-Care Tool for TSH Evaluation and a Centralized Laboratory-Based Method in a Cohort of Patients from Southern Italy |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between an Emerging Point-of-Care Tool for TSH Evaluation and a Centralized Laboratory-Based Method in a Cohort of Patients from Southern Italy |
title_short | Comparison between an Emerging Point-of-Care Tool for TSH Evaluation and a Centralized Laboratory-Based Method in a Cohort of Patients from Southern Italy |
title_sort | comparison between an emerging point-of-care tool for tsh evaluation and a centralized laboratory-based method in a cohort of patients from southern italy |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8471571/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34573932 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091590 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dicerboalfredo comparisonbetweenanemergingpointofcaretoolfortshevaluationandacentralizedlaboratorybasedmethodinacohortofpatientsfromsouthernitaly AT quaglianonazario comparisonbetweenanemergingpointofcaretoolfortshevaluationandacentralizedlaboratorybasedmethodinacohortofpatientsfromsouthernitaly AT napolitanoantonella comparisonbetweenanemergingpointofcaretoolfortshevaluationandacentralizedlaboratorybasedmethodinacohortofpatientsfromsouthernitaly AT pezzutofederica comparisonbetweenanemergingpointofcaretoolfortshevaluationandacentralizedlaboratorybasedmethodinacohortofpatientsfromsouthernitaly AT iannittitommaso comparisonbetweenanemergingpointofcaretoolfortshevaluationandacentralizedlaboratorybasedmethodinacohortofpatientsfromsouthernitaly AT dicerboalessandro comparisonbetweenanemergingpointofcaretoolfortshevaluationandacentralizedlaboratorybasedmethodinacohortofpatientsfromsouthernitaly |