Cargando…

Comparison between an Emerging Point-of-Care Tool for TSH Evaluation and a Centralized Laboratory-Based Method in a Cohort of Patients from Southern Italy

Endocrine and metabolic disorders are a common condition in Europe and worldwide, and, among these, thyroid dysfunction still remains a problem. The measurement of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) levels represents the first-line assay for the assessment of thyroid function. In the present study, w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Di Cerbo, Alfredo, Quagliano, Nazario, Napolitano, Antonella, Pezzuto, Federica, Iannitti, Tommaso, Di Cerbo, Alessandro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8471571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34573932
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091590
_version_ 1784574501188534272
author Di Cerbo, Alfredo
Quagliano, Nazario
Napolitano, Antonella
Pezzuto, Federica
Iannitti, Tommaso
Di Cerbo, Alessandro
author_facet Di Cerbo, Alfredo
Quagliano, Nazario
Napolitano, Antonella
Pezzuto, Federica
Iannitti, Tommaso
Di Cerbo, Alessandro
author_sort Di Cerbo, Alfredo
collection PubMed
description Endocrine and metabolic disorders are a common condition in Europe and worldwide, and, among these, thyroid dysfunction still remains a problem. The measurement of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) levels represents the first-line assay for the assessment of thyroid function. In the present study, we compared serum concentrations of TSH, measured using a commercially available point-of-care test (POCT) method (FastPack(®) IP) and an established “conventional” laboratory-based method (Beckmann Access 2) in a cohort of patients from Foggia in Southern Italy. A strong correlation (r = 0.994) was found between both methods and was also confirmed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis (0.82). The within-run coefficient of variation (CV) using FastPack(®) ranged from 4.03% and 8.57% at the TSH concentrations of 39.49 and 0.70 mIU/L, respectively. The between-run CV was 10.34% and 6.33% at the TSH concentrations of 0.87 and 26.55 mIU/L, respectively. The ratios of within- to between-assay CV were 0.83 and 1.06 at the TSH levels of 0.70 and 52.59 mIU/mL, respectively. In this study, we showed that serum TSH levels can be measured in a few minutes and at low-cost in terms of materials and equipment required. We observed that this approach is user-friendly, accurate, reproducible, and suitable for use in the clinic, while also meeting the criteria for effectiveness, impact, efficiency, and sustainability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8471571
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84715712021-09-28 Comparison between an Emerging Point-of-Care Tool for TSH Evaluation and a Centralized Laboratory-Based Method in a Cohort of Patients from Southern Italy Di Cerbo, Alfredo Quagliano, Nazario Napolitano, Antonella Pezzuto, Federica Iannitti, Tommaso Di Cerbo, Alessandro Diagnostics (Basel) Article Endocrine and metabolic disorders are a common condition in Europe and worldwide, and, among these, thyroid dysfunction still remains a problem. The measurement of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) levels represents the first-line assay for the assessment of thyroid function. In the present study, we compared serum concentrations of TSH, measured using a commercially available point-of-care test (POCT) method (FastPack(®) IP) and an established “conventional” laboratory-based method (Beckmann Access 2) in a cohort of patients from Foggia in Southern Italy. A strong correlation (r = 0.994) was found between both methods and was also confirmed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis (0.82). The within-run coefficient of variation (CV) using FastPack(®) ranged from 4.03% and 8.57% at the TSH concentrations of 39.49 and 0.70 mIU/L, respectively. The between-run CV was 10.34% and 6.33% at the TSH concentrations of 0.87 and 26.55 mIU/L, respectively. The ratios of within- to between-assay CV were 0.83 and 1.06 at the TSH levels of 0.70 and 52.59 mIU/mL, respectively. In this study, we showed that serum TSH levels can be measured in a few minutes and at low-cost in terms of materials and equipment required. We observed that this approach is user-friendly, accurate, reproducible, and suitable for use in the clinic, while also meeting the criteria for effectiveness, impact, efficiency, and sustainability. MDPI 2021-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8471571/ /pubmed/34573932 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091590 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Di Cerbo, Alfredo
Quagliano, Nazario
Napolitano, Antonella
Pezzuto, Federica
Iannitti, Tommaso
Di Cerbo, Alessandro
Comparison between an Emerging Point-of-Care Tool for TSH Evaluation and a Centralized Laboratory-Based Method in a Cohort of Patients from Southern Italy
title Comparison between an Emerging Point-of-Care Tool for TSH Evaluation and a Centralized Laboratory-Based Method in a Cohort of Patients from Southern Italy
title_full Comparison between an Emerging Point-of-Care Tool for TSH Evaluation and a Centralized Laboratory-Based Method in a Cohort of Patients from Southern Italy
title_fullStr Comparison between an Emerging Point-of-Care Tool for TSH Evaluation and a Centralized Laboratory-Based Method in a Cohort of Patients from Southern Italy
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between an Emerging Point-of-Care Tool for TSH Evaluation and a Centralized Laboratory-Based Method in a Cohort of Patients from Southern Italy
title_short Comparison between an Emerging Point-of-Care Tool for TSH Evaluation and a Centralized Laboratory-Based Method in a Cohort of Patients from Southern Italy
title_sort comparison between an emerging point-of-care tool for tsh evaluation and a centralized laboratory-based method in a cohort of patients from southern italy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8471571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34573932
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091590
work_keys_str_mv AT dicerboalfredo comparisonbetweenanemergingpointofcaretoolfortshevaluationandacentralizedlaboratorybasedmethodinacohortofpatientsfromsouthernitaly
AT quaglianonazario comparisonbetweenanemergingpointofcaretoolfortshevaluationandacentralizedlaboratorybasedmethodinacohortofpatientsfromsouthernitaly
AT napolitanoantonella comparisonbetweenanemergingpointofcaretoolfortshevaluationandacentralizedlaboratorybasedmethodinacohortofpatientsfromsouthernitaly
AT pezzutofederica comparisonbetweenanemergingpointofcaretoolfortshevaluationandacentralizedlaboratorybasedmethodinacohortofpatientsfromsouthernitaly
AT iannittitommaso comparisonbetweenanemergingpointofcaretoolfortshevaluationandacentralizedlaboratorybasedmethodinacohortofpatientsfromsouthernitaly
AT dicerboalessandro comparisonbetweenanemergingpointofcaretoolfortshevaluationandacentralizedlaboratorybasedmethodinacohortofpatientsfromsouthernitaly