Cargando…

The Use of Draught Animals in Rural Labour

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Although mechanisation has markedly reduced animal labour demand in agriculture, draught animals are still used in small production units located on terrains that do not favour agriculture mechanisation. Especially in Africa, Latin America, and Asia, they represent one of the main so...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mota-Rojas, Daniel, Braghieri, Ada, Álvarez-Macías, Adolfo, Serrapica, Francesco, Ramírez-Bribiesca, Efrén, Cruz-Monterrosa, Rosy, Masucci, Felicia, Mora-Medina, Patricia, Napolitano, Fabio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8471664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34573649
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11092683
_version_ 1784574526292492288
author Mota-Rojas, Daniel
Braghieri, Ada
Álvarez-Macías, Adolfo
Serrapica, Francesco
Ramírez-Bribiesca, Efrén
Cruz-Monterrosa, Rosy
Masucci, Felicia
Mora-Medina, Patricia
Napolitano, Fabio
author_facet Mota-Rojas, Daniel
Braghieri, Ada
Álvarez-Macías, Adolfo
Serrapica, Francesco
Ramírez-Bribiesca, Efrén
Cruz-Monterrosa, Rosy
Masucci, Felicia
Mora-Medina, Patricia
Napolitano, Fabio
author_sort Mota-Rojas, Daniel
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Although mechanisation has markedly reduced animal labour demand in agriculture, draught animals are still used in small production units located on terrains that do not favour agriculture mechanisation. Especially in Africa, Latin America, and Asia, they represent one of the main sources of sustenance for thousands of families who utilise animal labour in numerous agricultural tasks, such as ploughing and harvesting, as well as means of transport and hauling. Depending on the geographic area, the species involved are equids (horses, donkeys, and mules) and bovids (buffaloes and cattle). Draught animals proved to be sustainable in terms of global warming and the use of non-renewable energy as compared with agricultural machinery. However, critical points are the quality of human–animal interaction, due to the close contact between animals and humans while working, and the welfare of draught animals when transported and slaughtered, due to the high prevalence of injuries they suffer when subjected to these practices. Therefore, their use should be promoted in rural marginal areas where only low investments are usually feasible, and the energy of the animals can be obtained at a low cost by feeding them harvest residues and by-products. ABSTRACT: This study discusses scientific findings on the use of draught animals such as equids (i.e., horses, mules, and donkeys) and bovids (i.e., cattle and water buffaloes) in rural labours. Relevant peer-reviewed literature published between 1980 and 2021 was retrieved from CAB Abstracts, PubMed, ISI Web of Knowledge, and Scopus databases. Although animals were used to produce draught power since their domestication and are still being used for this purpose, mechanisation has markedly reduced animal labour demand in agriculture. However, the process was uneven across continents according to economic constraints, and draught animals are currently concentrated in small production units located on terrains that do not favour agriculture mechanisation in Africa, Latin America, and Asia. Generally, equids can work at rates similar to those of bovids or faster but can sustain the work for shorter periods of time. In addition, buffaloes possess tough hooves and resistance to disease that make them suitable for working in wetlands and clay soils. Draught animals allow a marked reduction of both GHG emissions and non-renewable energy consumption as compared with agricultural machinery. In addition, they may allow obtaining profits from otherwise non-usable lands. Therefore, their use should be promoted in rural areas where low investments are usually the only ones feasible, and the energy of the animals can be obtained at a low cost by feeding them harvest residues and by-products. However, more attention should be paid to the quality of human–animal interactions—due to the close contact between animals and humans while working—and to the welfare of draught animals when transported and slaughtered—due to the high prevalence of injuries they suffer when subjected to these practices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8471664
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84716642021-09-28 The Use of Draught Animals in Rural Labour Mota-Rojas, Daniel Braghieri, Ada Álvarez-Macías, Adolfo Serrapica, Francesco Ramírez-Bribiesca, Efrén Cruz-Monterrosa, Rosy Masucci, Felicia Mora-Medina, Patricia Napolitano, Fabio Animals (Basel) Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: Although mechanisation has markedly reduced animal labour demand in agriculture, draught animals are still used in small production units located on terrains that do not favour agriculture mechanisation. Especially in Africa, Latin America, and Asia, they represent one of the main sources of sustenance for thousands of families who utilise animal labour in numerous agricultural tasks, such as ploughing and harvesting, as well as means of transport and hauling. Depending on the geographic area, the species involved are equids (horses, donkeys, and mules) and bovids (buffaloes and cattle). Draught animals proved to be sustainable in terms of global warming and the use of non-renewable energy as compared with agricultural machinery. However, critical points are the quality of human–animal interaction, due to the close contact between animals and humans while working, and the welfare of draught animals when transported and slaughtered, due to the high prevalence of injuries they suffer when subjected to these practices. Therefore, their use should be promoted in rural marginal areas where only low investments are usually feasible, and the energy of the animals can be obtained at a low cost by feeding them harvest residues and by-products. ABSTRACT: This study discusses scientific findings on the use of draught animals such as equids (i.e., horses, mules, and donkeys) and bovids (i.e., cattle and water buffaloes) in rural labours. Relevant peer-reviewed literature published between 1980 and 2021 was retrieved from CAB Abstracts, PubMed, ISI Web of Knowledge, and Scopus databases. Although animals were used to produce draught power since their domestication and are still being used for this purpose, mechanisation has markedly reduced animal labour demand in agriculture. However, the process was uneven across continents according to economic constraints, and draught animals are currently concentrated in small production units located on terrains that do not favour agriculture mechanisation in Africa, Latin America, and Asia. Generally, equids can work at rates similar to those of bovids or faster but can sustain the work for shorter periods of time. In addition, buffaloes possess tough hooves and resistance to disease that make them suitable for working in wetlands and clay soils. Draught animals allow a marked reduction of both GHG emissions and non-renewable energy consumption as compared with agricultural machinery. In addition, they may allow obtaining profits from otherwise non-usable lands. Therefore, their use should be promoted in rural areas where low investments are usually the only ones feasible, and the energy of the animals can be obtained at a low cost by feeding them harvest residues and by-products. However, more attention should be paid to the quality of human–animal interactions—due to the close contact between animals and humans while working—and to the welfare of draught animals when transported and slaughtered—due to the high prevalence of injuries they suffer when subjected to these practices. MDPI 2021-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8471664/ /pubmed/34573649 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11092683 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Mota-Rojas, Daniel
Braghieri, Ada
Álvarez-Macías, Adolfo
Serrapica, Francesco
Ramírez-Bribiesca, Efrén
Cruz-Monterrosa, Rosy
Masucci, Felicia
Mora-Medina, Patricia
Napolitano, Fabio
The Use of Draught Animals in Rural Labour
title The Use of Draught Animals in Rural Labour
title_full The Use of Draught Animals in Rural Labour
title_fullStr The Use of Draught Animals in Rural Labour
title_full_unstemmed The Use of Draught Animals in Rural Labour
title_short The Use of Draught Animals in Rural Labour
title_sort use of draught animals in rural labour
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8471664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34573649
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11092683
work_keys_str_mv AT motarojasdaniel theuseofdraughtanimalsinrurallabour
AT braghieriada theuseofdraughtanimalsinrurallabour
AT alvarezmaciasadolfo theuseofdraughtanimalsinrurallabour
AT serrapicafrancesco theuseofdraughtanimalsinrurallabour
AT ramirezbribiescaefren theuseofdraughtanimalsinrurallabour
AT cruzmonterrosarosy theuseofdraughtanimalsinrurallabour
AT masuccifelicia theuseofdraughtanimalsinrurallabour
AT moramedinapatricia theuseofdraughtanimalsinrurallabour
AT napolitanofabio theuseofdraughtanimalsinrurallabour
AT motarojasdaniel useofdraughtanimalsinrurallabour
AT braghieriada useofdraughtanimalsinrurallabour
AT alvarezmaciasadolfo useofdraughtanimalsinrurallabour
AT serrapicafrancesco useofdraughtanimalsinrurallabour
AT ramirezbribiescaefren useofdraughtanimalsinrurallabour
AT cruzmonterrosarosy useofdraughtanimalsinrurallabour
AT masuccifelicia useofdraughtanimalsinrurallabour
AT moramedinapatricia useofdraughtanimalsinrurallabour
AT napolitanofabio useofdraughtanimalsinrurallabour