Cargando…
Acute Radiation Dermatitis Evaluation with Reflectance Confocal Microscopy: A Prospective Study
Background: During radiotherapy (RT), most breast cancer patients experience ionizing radiation (IR)-induced skin injury—acute radiation dermatitis (ARD). The severity of ARD is determined by a physician according to CTCAE or RTOG scales, which are subjective. Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8471711/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34574012 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091670 |
_version_ | 1784574538292396032 |
---|---|
author | Kišonas, Juras Venius, Jonas Grybauskas, Mindaugas Dabkevičienė, Daiva Burneckis, Arvydas Rotomskis, Ričardas |
author_facet | Kišonas, Juras Venius, Jonas Grybauskas, Mindaugas Dabkevičienė, Daiva Burneckis, Arvydas Rotomskis, Ričardas |
author_sort | Kišonas, Juras |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: During radiotherapy (RT), most breast cancer patients experience ionizing radiation (IR)-induced skin injury—acute radiation dermatitis (ARD). The severity of ARD is determined by a physician according to CTCAE or RTOG scales, which are subjective. Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) is a noninvasive skin imaging technique offering cellular resolution. Digital dermoscopy (DD) performed in conjugation with RCM can provide more information regarding skin toxicity. The purpose of this study is to create an RCM and DD features-based ARD assessment scale, to assess the association with CTCAE scale and possible predictive value. Methods: One hundred and three breast cancer patients during RT were recruited; every week, clinical symptoms of ARD (CTCAE scale) were evaluated and RCM, together with digital dermoscopy (DD), was performed. Results: According to RCM; after 2 RT weeks, exocytosis and/or spongiosis were present in 94% of patients; after 3 weeks, mild contrast cells (MMCs) were detected in 45%; disarrayed epidermis (DE) was present in 66% of patients after 4 weeks and in 93% after 5 weeks; abnormal dermal papillae (ADP) were present in 68% of patients after 5 weeks. The coefficients of RCM features (RCM(coef)) alone and together with dermoscopically determined erythema (RCM-ERY(coef)) were significantly associated with ARD severity grade. RCM(coef) is a significant predictive factor for the clinical manifestation of ARD. Conclusions: RCM features of irradiated skin appear earlier than clinical symptoms, have a characteristic course, and allow the severity of ARD to be predicted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8471711 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84717112021-09-28 Acute Radiation Dermatitis Evaluation with Reflectance Confocal Microscopy: A Prospective Study Kišonas, Juras Venius, Jonas Grybauskas, Mindaugas Dabkevičienė, Daiva Burneckis, Arvydas Rotomskis, Ričardas Diagnostics (Basel) Article Background: During radiotherapy (RT), most breast cancer patients experience ionizing radiation (IR)-induced skin injury—acute radiation dermatitis (ARD). The severity of ARD is determined by a physician according to CTCAE or RTOG scales, which are subjective. Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) is a noninvasive skin imaging technique offering cellular resolution. Digital dermoscopy (DD) performed in conjugation with RCM can provide more information regarding skin toxicity. The purpose of this study is to create an RCM and DD features-based ARD assessment scale, to assess the association with CTCAE scale and possible predictive value. Methods: One hundred and three breast cancer patients during RT were recruited; every week, clinical symptoms of ARD (CTCAE scale) were evaluated and RCM, together with digital dermoscopy (DD), was performed. Results: According to RCM; after 2 RT weeks, exocytosis and/or spongiosis were present in 94% of patients; after 3 weeks, mild contrast cells (MMCs) were detected in 45%; disarrayed epidermis (DE) was present in 66% of patients after 4 weeks and in 93% after 5 weeks; abnormal dermal papillae (ADP) were present in 68% of patients after 5 weeks. The coefficients of RCM features (RCM(coef)) alone and together with dermoscopically determined erythema (RCM-ERY(coef)) were significantly associated with ARD severity grade. RCM(coef) is a significant predictive factor for the clinical manifestation of ARD. Conclusions: RCM features of irradiated skin appear earlier than clinical symptoms, have a characteristic course, and allow the severity of ARD to be predicted. MDPI 2021-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8471711/ /pubmed/34574012 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091670 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Kišonas, Juras Venius, Jonas Grybauskas, Mindaugas Dabkevičienė, Daiva Burneckis, Arvydas Rotomskis, Ričardas Acute Radiation Dermatitis Evaluation with Reflectance Confocal Microscopy: A Prospective Study |
title | Acute Radiation Dermatitis Evaluation with Reflectance Confocal Microscopy: A Prospective Study |
title_full | Acute Radiation Dermatitis Evaluation with Reflectance Confocal Microscopy: A Prospective Study |
title_fullStr | Acute Radiation Dermatitis Evaluation with Reflectance Confocal Microscopy: A Prospective Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Acute Radiation Dermatitis Evaluation with Reflectance Confocal Microscopy: A Prospective Study |
title_short | Acute Radiation Dermatitis Evaluation with Reflectance Confocal Microscopy: A Prospective Study |
title_sort | acute radiation dermatitis evaluation with reflectance confocal microscopy: a prospective study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8471711/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34574012 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091670 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kisonasjuras acuteradiationdermatitisevaluationwithreflectanceconfocalmicroscopyaprospectivestudy AT veniusjonas acuteradiationdermatitisevaluationwithreflectanceconfocalmicroscopyaprospectivestudy AT grybauskasmindaugas acuteradiationdermatitisevaluationwithreflectanceconfocalmicroscopyaprospectivestudy AT dabkevicienedaiva acuteradiationdermatitisevaluationwithreflectanceconfocalmicroscopyaprospectivestudy AT burneckisarvydas acuteradiationdermatitisevaluationwithreflectanceconfocalmicroscopyaprospectivestudy AT rotomskisricardas acuteradiationdermatitisevaluationwithreflectanceconfocalmicroscopyaprospectivestudy |