Cargando…
The T2-FLAIR Mismatch Sign as an Imaging Indicator of IDH-Mutant, 1p/19q Non-Codeleted Lower Grade Gliomas: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Accuracy Meta-Analysis
The study’s objective was the evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of the T2-FLAIR mismatch sign in terms of diagnosing IDH-mutant non-codeleted (IDHmut-Noncodel) lower grade gliomas (LGG) of the brain. We searched the MEDLINE, Scopus and Cochrane Central databases. The last database search was per...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8471804/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34573962 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091620 |
_version_ | 1784574562056273920 |
---|---|
author | Adamou, Antonis Beltsios, Eleftherios T. Papanagiotou, Panagiotis |
author_facet | Adamou, Antonis Beltsios, Eleftherios T. Papanagiotou, Panagiotis |
author_sort | Adamou, Antonis |
collection | PubMed |
description | The study’s objective was the evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of the T2-FLAIR mismatch sign in terms of diagnosing IDH-mutant non-codeleted (IDHmut-Noncodel) lower grade gliomas (LGG) of the brain. We searched the MEDLINE, Scopus and Cochrane Central databases. The last database search was performed on 12 April 2021. Studies that met the following were included: MRI scan assessing the presence of T2-FLAIR mismatch sign, and available IDH mutation and 1p/19q codeletion status. The quality of studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Twelve studies involving 14 cohorts were included in the quantitative analysis. The diagnostic odds ratio [DOR (95% confidence interval; CI)] was estimated at 34.42 (20.95, 56.56), P(z) < 0.01. Pooled sensitivity and specificity (95% CI) were estimated at 40% (31–50%; P(z) = 0.05) and 97% (93–99%; P(z) < 0.01), respectively. The likelihood ratio (LR; 95% CI) for a positive test was 11.39 (6.10, 21.29; P(z) < 0.01) and the LR (95% CI) for a negative test was 0.40 (0.24, 0.65; P(z) < 0.01).The T2-FLAIR mismatch sign is a highly specific biomarker for the diagnosis of IDHmut-Noncodel LGGs. However, the test was found positive in some other tumors and had a high number of false negative results. The diagnostic accuracy of the mismatch sign might be improved when combined with further imaging parameters. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8471804 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84718042021-09-28 The T2-FLAIR Mismatch Sign as an Imaging Indicator of IDH-Mutant, 1p/19q Non-Codeleted Lower Grade Gliomas: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Accuracy Meta-Analysis Adamou, Antonis Beltsios, Eleftherios T. Papanagiotou, Panagiotis Diagnostics (Basel) Review The study’s objective was the evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of the T2-FLAIR mismatch sign in terms of diagnosing IDH-mutant non-codeleted (IDHmut-Noncodel) lower grade gliomas (LGG) of the brain. We searched the MEDLINE, Scopus and Cochrane Central databases. The last database search was performed on 12 April 2021. Studies that met the following were included: MRI scan assessing the presence of T2-FLAIR mismatch sign, and available IDH mutation and 1p/19q codeletion status. The quality of studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Twelve studies involving 14 cohorts were included in the quantitative analysis. The diagnostic odds ratio [DOR (95% confidence interval; CI)] was estimated at 34.42 (20.95, 56.56), P(z) < 0.01. Pooled sensitivity and specificity (95% CI) were estimated at 40% (31–50%; P(z) = 0.05) and 97% (93–99%; P(z) < 0.01), respectively. The likelihood ratio (LR; 95% CI) for a positive test was 11.39 (6.10, 21.29; P(z) < 0.01) and the LR (95% CI) for a negative test was 0.40 (0.24, 0.65; P(z) < 0.01).The T2-FLAIR mismatch sign is a highly specific biomarker for the diagnosis of IDHmut-Noncodel LGGs. However, the test was found positive in some other tumors and had a high number of false negative results. The diagnostic accuracy of the mismatch sign might be improved when combined with further imaging parameters. MDPI 2021-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8471804/ /pubmed/34573962 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091620 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Adamou, Antonis Beltsios, Eleftherios T. Papanagiotou, Panagiotis The T2-FLAIR Mismatch Sign as an Imaging Indicator of IDH-Mutant, 1p/19q Non-Codeleted Lower Grade Gliomas: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Accuracy Meta-Analysis |
title | The T2-FLAIR Mismatch Sign as an Imaging Indicator of IDH-Mutant, 1p/19q Non-Codeleted Lower Grade Gliomas: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Accuracy Meta-Analysis |
title_full | The T2-FLAIR Mismatch Sign as an Imaging Indicator of IDH-Mutant, 1p/19q Non-Codeleted Lower Grade Gliomas: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Accuracy Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | The T2-FLAIR Mismatch Sign as an Imaging Indicator of IDH-Mutant, 1p/19q Non-Codeleted Lower Grade Gliomas: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Accuracy Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The T2-FLAIR Mismatch Sign as an Imaging Indicator of IDH-Mutant, 1p/19q Non-Codeleted Lower Grade Gliomas: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Accuracy Meta-Analysis |
title_short | The T2-FLAIR Mismatch Sign as an Imaging Indicator of IDH-Mutant, 1p/19q Non-Codeleted Lower Grade Gliomas: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Accuracy Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | t2-flair mismatch sign as an imaging indicator of idh-mutant, 1p/19q non-codeleted lower grade gliomas: a systematic review and diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8471804/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34573962 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091620 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT adamouantonis thet2flairmismatchsignasanimagingindicatorofidhmutant1p19qnoncodeletedlowergradegliomasasystematicreviewanddiagnosticaccuracymetaanalysis AT beltsioseleftheriost thet2flairmismatchsignasanimagingindicatorofidhmutant1p19qnoncodeletedlowergradegliomasasystematicreviewanddiagnosticaccuracymetaanalysis AT papanagiotoupanagiotis thet2flairmismatchsignasanimagingindicatorofidhmutant1p19qnoncodeletedlowergradegliomasasystematicreviewanddiagnosticaccuracymetaanalysis AT adamouantonis t2flairmismatchsignasanimagingindicatorofidhmutant1p19qnoncodeletedlowergradegliomasasystematicreviewanddiagnosticaccuracymetaanalysis AT beltsioseleftheriost t2flairmismatchsignasanimagingindicatorofidhmutant1p19qnoncodeletedlowergradegliomasasystematicreviewanddiagnosticaccuracymetaanalysis AT papanagiotoupanagiotis t2flairmismatchsignasanimagingindicatorofidhmutant1p19qnoncodeletedlowergradegliomasasystematicreviewanddiagnosticaccuracymetaanalysis |