Cargando…

Laboratory Validation of Instrumented Mouthguard for Use in Sport

Concussion is an inherent risk of participating in contact, combat, or collision sports, within which head impacts are numerous. Kinematic parameters such as peak linear and rotational acceleration represent primary measures of concussive head impacts. The ability to accurately measure and categoris...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stitt, Danyon, Draper, Nick, Alexander, Keith, Kabaliuk, Natalia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8472105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34577235
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21186028
_version_ 1784574643176210432
author Stitt, Danyon
Draper, Nick
Alexander, Keith
Kabaliuk, Natalia
author_facet Stitt, Danyon
Draper, Nick
Alexander, Keith
Kabaliuk, Natalia
author_sort Stitt, Danyon
collection PubMed
description Concussion is an inherent risk of participating in contact, combat, or collision sports, within which head impacts are numerous. Kinematic parameters such as peak linear and rotational acceleration represent primary measures of concussive head impacts. The ability to accurately measure and categorise such impact parameters in real time is important in health and sports performance contexts. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of the latest HitIQ Nexus A9 instrumented mouthguard (HitIQ Pty. Ltd. Melbourne Australia) against reference sensors in an aluminium headform. The headform underwent drop testing at various impact intensities across the NOCSAE-defined impact locations, comparing the peak linear and rotational acceleration (PLA and PRA) as well as the shapes of the acceleration time-series traces for each impact. Mouthguard PLA and PRA measurements strongly correlated with (R(2) = 0.996 and 0.994 respectively), and strongly agreed with (LCCC = 0.997) the reference sensors. The root mean square error between the measurement devices was 1 ± 0.6g for linear acceleration and 47.4 ± 35 rad/s(2) for rotational acceleration. A Bland–Altman analysis found a systematic bias of 1% for PRA, with no significant bias for PLA. The instrumented mouthguard displayed high accuracy when measuring head impact kinematics in a laboratory setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8472105
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84721052021-09-28 Laboratory Validation of Instrumented Mouthguard for Use in Sport Stitt, Danyon Draper, Nick Alexander, Keith Kabaliuk, Natalia Sensors (Basel) Article Concussion is an inherent risk of participating in contact, combat, or collision sports, within which head impacts are numerous. Kinematic parameters such as peak linear and rotational acceleration represent primary measures of concussive head impacts. The ability to accurately measure and categorise such impact parameters in real time is important in health and sports performance contexts. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of the latest HitIQ Nexus A9 instrumented mouthguard (HitIQ Pty. Ltd. Melbourne Australia) against reference sensors in an aluminium headform. The headform underwent drop testing at various impact intensities across the NOCSAE-defined impact locations, comparing the peak linear and rotational acceleration (PLA and PRA) as well as the shapes of the acceleration time-series traces for each impact. Mouthguard PLA and PRA measurements strongly correlated with (R(2) = 0.996 and 0.994 respectively), and strongly agreed with (LCCC = 0.997) the reference sensors. The root mean square error between the measurement devices was 1 ± 0.6g for linear acceleration and 47.4 ± 35 rad/s(2) for rotational acceleration. A Bland–Altman analysis found a systematic bias of 1% for PRA, with no significant bias for PLA. The instrumented mouthguard displayed high accuracy when measuring head impact kinematics in a laboratory setting. MDPI 2021-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8472105/ /pubmed/34577235 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21186028 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Stitt, Danyon
Draper, Nick
Alexander, Keith
Kabaliuk, Natalia
Laboratory Validation of Instrumented Mouthguard for Use in Sport
title Laboratory Validation of Instrumented Mouthguard for Use in Sport
title_full Laboratory Validation of Instrumented Mouthguard for Use in Sport
title_fullStr Laboratory Validation of Instrumented Mouthguard for Use in Sport
title_full_unstemmed Laboratory Validation of Instrumented Mouthguard for Use in Sport
title_short Laboratory Validation of Instrumented Mouthguard for Use in Sport
title_sort laboratory validation of instrumented mouthguard for use in sport
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8472105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34577235
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21186028
work_keys_str_mv AT stittdanyon laboratoryvalidationofinstrumentedmouthguardforuseinsport
AT drapernick laboratoryvalidationofinstrumentedmouthguardforuseinsport
AT alexanderkeith laboratoryvalidationofinstrumentedmouthguardforuseinsport
AT kabaliuknatalia laboratoryvalidationofinstrumentedmouthguardforuseinsport