Cargando…
Laboratory Validation of Instrumented Mouthguard for Use in Sport
Concussion is an inherent risk of participating in contact, combat, or collision sports, within which head impacts are numerous. Kinematic parameters such as peak linear and rotational acceleration represent primary measures of concussive head impacts. The ability to accurately measure and categoris...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8472105/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34577235 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21186028 |
_version_ | 1784574643176210432 |
---|---|
author | Stitt, Danyon Draper, Nick Alexander, Keith Kabaliuk, Natalia |
author_facet | Stitt, Danyon Draper, Nick Alexander, Keith Kabaliuk, Natalia |
author_sort | Stitt, Danyon |
collection | PubMed |
description | Concussion is an inherent risk of participating in contact, combat, or collision sports, within which head impacts are numerous. Kinematic parameters such as peak linear and rotational acceleration represent primary measures of concussive head impacts. The ability to accurately measure and categorise such impact parameters in real time is important in health and sports performance contexts. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of the latest HitIQ Nexus A9 instrumented mouthguard (HitIQ Pty. Ltd. Melbourne Australia) against reference sensors in an aluminium headform. The headform underwent drop testing at various impact intensities across the NOCSAE-defined impact locations, comparing the peak linear and rotational acceleration (PLA and PRA) as well as the shapes of the acceleration time-series traces for each impact. Mouthguard PLA and PRA measurements strongly correlated with (R(2) = 0.996 and 0.994 respectively), and strongly agreed with (LCCC = 0.997) the reference sensors. The root mean square error between the measurement devices was 1 ± 0.6g for linear acceleration and 47.4 ± 35 rad/s(2) for rotational acceleration. A Bland–Altman analysis found a systematic bias of 1% for PRA, with no significant bias for PLA. The instrumented mouthguard displayed high accuracy when measuring head impact kinematics in a laboratory setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8472105 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84721052021-09-28 Laboratory Validation of Instrumented Mouthguard for Use in Sport Stitt, Danyon Draper, Nick Alexander, Keith Kabaliuk, Natalia Sensors (Basel) Article Concussion is an inherent risk of participating in contact, combat, or collision sports, within which head impacts are numerous. Kinematic parameters such as peak linear and rotational acceleration represent primary measures of concussive head impacts. The ability to accurately measure and categorise such impact parameters in real time is important in health and sports performance contexts. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of the latest HitIQ Nexus A9 instrumented mouthguard (HitIQ Pty. Ltd. Melbourne Australia) against reference sensors in an aluminium headform. The headform underwent drop testing at various impact intensities across the NOCSAE-defined impact locations, comparing the peak linear and rotational acceleration (PLA and PRA) as well as the shapes of the acceleration time-series traces for each impact. Mouthguard PLA and PRA measurements strongly correlated with (R(2) = 0.996 and 0.994 respectively), and strongly agreed with (LCCC = 0.997) the reference sensors. The root mean square error between the measurement devices was 1 ± 0.6g for linear acceleration and 47.4 ± 35 rad/s(2) for rotational acceleration. A Bland–Altman analysis found a systematic bias of 1% for PRA, with no significant bias for PLA. The instrumented mouthguard displayed high accuracy when measuring head impact kinematics in a laboratory setting. MDPI 2021-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8472105/ /pubmed/34577235 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21186028 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Stitt, Danyon Draper, Nick Alexander, Keith Kabaliuk, Natalia Laboratory Validation of Instrumented Mouthguard for Use in Sport |
title | Laboratory Validation of Instrumented Mouthguard for Use in Sport |
title_full | Laboratory Validation of Instrumented Mouthguard for Use in Sport |
title_fullStr | Laboratory Validation of Instrumented Mouthguard for Use in Sport |
title_full_unstemmed | Laboratory Validation of Instrumented Mouthguard for Use in Sport |
title_short | Laboratory Validation of Instrumented Mouthguard for Use in Sport |
title_sort | laboratory validation of instrumented mouthguard for use in sport |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8472105/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34577235 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21186028 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stittdanyon laboratoryvalidationofinstrumentedmouthguardforuseinsport AT drapernick laboratoryvalidationofinstrumentedmouthguardforuseinsport AT alexanderkeith laboratoryvalidationofinstrumentedmouthguardforuseinsport AT kabaliuknatalia laboratoryvalidationofinstrumentedmouthguardforuseinsport |