Cargando…

Evaluating Change of Marginal Bone Height with Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Following Surgical Treatment with Guided Tissue Regeneration (Bone Grafting) or Access Flap Alone: A Retrospective Study

Background and Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the change of bone height following treatment of human intrabony defects with guided tissue regeneration (GTR) with bone grafting or access flap alone by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan. Materials and methods: This study was conducted...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, In-Kyung, Choi, Hyun-Seok, Jeong, Sang-Heon, Lee, Jung-Tae
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8472387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34577792
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina57090869
_version_ 1784574715708309504
author Lee, In-Kyung
Choi, Hyun-Seok
Jeong, Sang-Heon
Lee, Jung-Tae
author_facet Lee, In-Kyung
Choi, Hyun-Seok
Jeong, Sang-Heon
Lee, Jung-Tae
author_sort Lee, In-Kyung
collection PubMed
description Background and Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the change of bone height following treatment of human intrabony defects with guided tissue regeneration (GTR) with bone grafting or access flap alone by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan. Materials and methods: This study was conducted as a retrospective longitudinal study. In this study, a total of 2281 teeth sites were included: the GTR group had 1210 sites, and the Flap group had 1071 sites. In the GTR group, demineralized freeze-dried bone (DFDBA) particles in combination with resorbable collagen membrane were used. No regenerative material was applied to the Flap group. CBCT images were taken twice at baseline and at least 2.5 months postoperatively. Bone heights were measured using software on CBCT images. Results: The bony change between the GTR and Flap groups was significantly different (p = 0.00001). Both males and females in the GTR group had smaller bone loss than in the Flap group. In age groups, significant differences of bony height between the GTR and Flap groups were observed in the subgroups consisting of those 29–45 and 46–53 years old. The non-smoking subjects in the GTR group had higher bone heights than those in the Flap group. In the absence of systemic disease and medicine, bone formation was higher in the GTR group than in the Flap group. In terms of oral position, the #14–17, #34–37, and #44–47 subgroups of the GTR group showed higher levels of bone heights than those of the Flap group. Conclusions. The results of this study indicated that the GTR procedure offers the additional benefit of higher bone heights than the Flap procedure does.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8472387
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84723872021-09-28 Evaluating Change of Marginal Bone Height with Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Following Surgical Treatment with Guided Tissue Regeneration (Bone Grafting) or Access Flap Alone: A Retrospective Study Lee, In-Kyung Choi, Hyun-Seok Jeong, Sang-Heon Lee, Jung-Tae Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the change of bone height following treatment of human intrabony defects with guided tissue regeneration (GTR) with bone grafting or access flap alone by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan. Materials and methods: This study was conducted as a retrospective longitudinal study. In this study, a total of 2281 teeth sites were included: the GTR group had 1210 sites, and the Flap group had 1071 sites. In the GTR group, demineralized freeze-dried bone (DFDBA) particles in combination with resorbable collagen membrane were used. No regenerative material was applied to the Flap group. CBCT images were taken twice at baseline and at least 2.5 months postoperatively. Bone heights were measured using software on CBCT images. Results: The bony change between the GTR and Flap groups was significantly different (p = 0.00001). Both males and females in the GTR group had smaller bone loss than in the Flap group. In age groups, significant differences of bony height between the GTR and Flap groups were observed in the subgroups consisting of those 29–45 and 46–53 years old. The non-smoking subjects in the GTR group had higher bone heights than those in the Flap group. In the absence of systemic disease and medicine, bone formation was higher in the GTR group than in the Flap group. In terms of oral position, the #14–17, #34–37, and #44–47 subgroups of the GTR group showed higher levels of bone heights than those of the Flap group. Conclusions. The results of this study indicated that the GTR procedure offers the additional benefit of higher bone heights than the Flap procedure does. MDPI 2021-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8472387/ /pubmed/34577792 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina57090869 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lee, In-Kyung
Choi, Hyun-Seok
Jeong, Sang-Heon
Lee, Jung-Tae
Evaluating Change of Marginal Bone Height with Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Following Surgical Treatment with Guided Tissue Regeneration (Bone Grafting) or Access Flap Alone: A Retrospective Study
title Evaluating Change of Marginal Bone Height with Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Following Surgical Treatment with Guided Tissue Regeneration (Bone Grafting) or Access Flap Alone: A Retrospective Study
title_full Evaluating Change of Marginal Bone Height with Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Following Surgical Treatment with Guided Tissue Regeneration (Bone Grafting) or Access Flap Alone: A Retrospective Study
title_fullStr Evaluating Change of Marginal Bone Height with Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Following Surgical Treatment with Guided Tissue Regeneration (Bone Grafting) or Access Flap Alone: A Retrospective Study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Change of Marginal Bone Height with Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Following Surgical Treatment with Guided Tissue Regeneration (Bone Grafting) or Access Flap Alone: A Retrospective Study
title_short Evaluating Change of Marginal Bone Height with Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Following Surgical Treatment with Guided Tissue Regeneration (Bone Grafting) or Access Flap Alone: A Retrospective Study
title_sort evaluating change of marginal bone height with cone-beam computed tomography following surgical treatment with guided tissue regeneration (bone grafting) or access flap alone: a retrospective study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8472387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34577792
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina57090869
work_keys_str_mv AT leeinkyung evaluatingchangeofmarginalboneheightwithconebeamcomputedtomographyfollowingsurgicaltreatmentwithguidedtissueregenerationbonegraftingoraccessflapalonearetrospectivestudy
AT choihyunseok evaluatingchangeofmarginalboneheightwithconebeamcomputedtomographyfollowingsurgicaltreatmentwithguidedtissueregenerationbonegraftingoraccessflapalonearetrospectivestudy
AT jeongsangheon evaluatingchangeofmarginalboneheightwithconebeamcomputedtomographyfollowingsurgicaltreatmentwithguidedtissueregenerationbonegraftingoraccessflapalonearetrospectivestudy
AT leejungtae evaluatingchangeofmarginalboneheightwithconebeamcomputedtomographyfollowingsurgicaltreatmentwithguidedtissueregenerationbonegraftingoraccessflapalonearetrospectivestudy