Cargando…
How Do We Determine the Efficacy of an Antibacterial Surface? A Review of Standardised Antibacterial Material Testing Methods
Materials that confer antimicrobial activity, be that by innate property, leaching of biocides or design features (e.g., non-adhesive materials) continue to gain popularity to combat the increasing and varied threats from microorganisms, e.g., replacing inert surfaces in hospitals with copper. To un...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8472414/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34572650 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10091069 |
_version_ | 1784574722468478976 |
---|---|
author | Cunliffe, Alexander J. Askew, Peter D. Stephan, Ina Iredale, Gillian Cosemans, Patrick Simmons, Lisa M. Verran, Joanna Redfern, James |
author_facet | Cunliffe, Alexander J. Askew, Peter D. Stephan, Ina Iredale, Gillian Cosemans, Patrick Simmons, Lisa M. Verran, Joanna Redfern, James |
author_sort | Cunliffe, Alexander J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Materials that confer antimicrobial activity, be that by innate property, leaching of biocides or design features (e.g., non-adhesive materials) continue to gain popularity to combat the increasing and varied threats from microorganisms, e.g., replacing inert surfaces in hospitals with copper. To understand how efficacious these materials are at controlling microorganisms, data is usually collected via a standardised test method. However, standardised test methods vary, and often the characteristics and methodological choices can make it difficult to infer that any perceived antimicrobial activity demonstrated in the laboratory can be confidently assumed to an end-use setting. This review provides a critical analysis of standardised methodology used in academia and industry, and demonstrates how many key methodological choices (e.g., temperature, humidity/moisture, airflow, surface topography) may impact efficacy assessment, highlighting the need to carefully consider intended antimicrobial end-use of any product. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8472414 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84724142021-09-28 How Do We Determine the Efficacy of an Antibacterial Surface? A Review of Standardised Antibacterial Material Testing Methods Cunliffe, Alexander J. Askew, Peter D. Stephan, Ina Iredale, Gillian Cosemans, Patrick Simmons, Lisa M. Verran, Joanna Redfern, James Antibiotics (Basel) Review Materials that confer antimicrobial activity, be that by innate property, leaching of biocides or design features (e.g., non-adhesive materials) continue to gain popularity to combat the increasing and varied threats from microorganisms, e.g., replacing inert surfaces in hospitals with copper. To understand how efficacious these materials are at controlling microorganisms, data is usually collected via a standardised test method. However, standardised test methods vary, and often the characteristics and methodological choices can make it difficult to infer that any perceived antimicrobial activity demonstrated in the laboratory can be confidently assumed to an end-use setting. This review provides a critical analysis of standardised methodology used in academia and industry, and demonstrates how many key methodological choices (e.g., temperature, humidity/moisture, airflow, surface topography) may impact efficacy assessment, highlighting the need to carefully consider intended antimicrobial end-use of any product. MDPI 2021-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8472414/ /pubmed/34572650 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10091069 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Cunliffe, Alexander J. Askew, Peter D. Stephan, Ina Iredale, Gillian Cosemans, Patrick Simmons, Lisa M. Verran, Joanna Redfern, James How Do We Determine the Efficacy of an Antibacterial Surface? A Review of Standardised Antibacterial Material Testing Methods |
title | How Do We Determine the Efficacy of an Antibacterial Surface? A Review of Standardised Antibacterial Material Testing Methods |
title_full | How Do We Determine the Efficacy of an Antibacterial Surface? A Review of Standardised Antibacterial Material Testing Methods |
title_fullStr | How Do We Determine the Efficacy of an Antibacterial Surface? A Review of Standardised Antibacterial Material Testing Methods |
title_full_unstemmed | How Do We Determine the Efficacy of an Antibacterial Surface? A Review of Standardised Antibacterial Material Testing Methods |
title_short | How Do We Determine the Efficacy of an Antibacterial Surface? A Review of Standardised Antibacterial Material Testing Methods |
title_sort | how do we determine the efficacy of an antibacterial surface? a review of standardised antibacterial material testing methods |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8472414/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34572650 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10091069 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cunliffealexanderj howdowedeterminetheefficacyofanantibacterialsurfaceareviewofstandardisedantibacterialmaterialtestingmethods AT askewpeterd howdowedeterminetheefficacyofanantibacterialsurfaceareviewofstandardisedantibacterialmaterialtestingmethods AT stephanina howdowedeterminetheefficacyofanantibacterialsurfaceareviewofstandardisedantibacterialmaterialtestingmethods AT iredalegillian howdowedeterminetheefficacyofanantibacterialsurfaceareviewofstandardisedantibacterialmaterialtestingmethods AT cosemanspatrick howdowedeterminetheefficacyofanantibacterialsurfaceareviewofstandardisedantibacterialmaterialtestingmethods AT simmonslisam howdowedeterminetheefficacyofanantibacterialsurfaceareviewofstandardisedantibacterialmaterialtestingmethods AT verranjoanna howdowedeterminetheefficacyofanantibacterialsurfaceareviewofstandardisedantibacterialmaterialtestingmethods AT redfernjames howdowedeterminetheefficacyofanantibacterialsurfaceareviewofstandardisedantibacterialmaterialtestingmethods |