Cargando…

Implants Survival Rate in Regenerated Sites with Innovative Graft Biomaterials: 1 Year Follow-Up

In thirteen different dental clinics in Singapore, Spain, Czech Republic and Italy, 504 patients were selected, and 483 dental implants were placed in maxillary sites after alveolar socket preservation (ASP) procedures with an autologous demineralized tooth extracted as graft material from an innova...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Minetti, Elio, Celko, Martin, Contessi, Marcello, Carini, Fabrizio, Gambardella, Ugo, Giacometti, Edoardo, Santillana, Jesus, Beca Campoy, Tomas, Schmitz, Johannes H., Libertucci, Mauro, Ho, Henrykim, Haan, Simon, Mastrangelo, Filiberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8472708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34576516
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14185292
_version_ 1784574804150452224
author Minetti, Elio
Celko, Martin
Contessi, Marcello
Carini, Fabrizio
Gambardella, Ugo
Giacometti, Edoardo
Santillana, Jesus
Beca Campoy, Tomas
Schmitz, Johannes H.
Libertucci, Mauro
Ho, Henrykim
Haan, Simon
Mastrangelo, Filiberto
author_facet Minetti, Elio
Celko, Martin
Contessi, Marcello
Carini, Fabrizio
Gambardella, Ugo
Giacometti, Edoardo
Santillana, Jesus
Beca Campoy, Tomas
Schmitz, Johannes H.
Libertucci, Mauro
Ho, Henrykim
Haan, Simon
Mastrangelo, Filiberto
author_sort Minetti, Elio
collection PubMed
description In thirteen different dental clinics in Singapore, Spain, Czech Republic and Italy, 504 patients were selected, and 483 dental implants were placed in maxillary sites after alveolar socket preservation (ASP) procedures with an autologous demineralized tooth extracted as graft material from an innovative Tooth Transformer device was obtained. All procedures used were reported in n°638 Ethical Committee surgical protocol of University of Chieti and approved. After 4 months, at dental implant placing, bone biopsies were performed to evaluate the histologic outcomes, and 12 months after implant loading, global implant survival rate, failure percentage and peri-implant bone loss were detected. After ASP, only 27 post-operative complications were observed and after 4 months, bone biopsy histomorphometric analysis showed a high percentage of bone volume (BV) 43.58 (±12.09), and vital new bone (NB) 32.38 (±17.15) with an absence of inflammation or necrosis areas. Twelve months after loading, only 10 dental implants failed (2.3%), with a 98.2% overall implant survival rate, nine cases showed mucositis (1.8%) and eight showed peri-implantitis (1.6%). At mesial sites, 0.43 mm (±0.83) of bone loss around the implants was detected and 0.23 mm (±0.38) at the distal sites with an average value of 0.37 mm (±0.68) (p > 0.568). Several studies with a longer follow-up will be necessary to confirm the preliminary data observed. However, clinical results seem to suggest that the post-extraction socket preservation procedure using innovative demineralized autologous tooth-derived biomaterial may be a predictable procedure to produce new vital bone able to support dental implant rehabilitation of maxilla edentulous sites.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8472708
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84727082021-09-28 Implants Survival Rate in Regenerated Sites with Innovative Graft Biomaterials: 1 Year Follow-Up Minetti, Elio Celko, Martin Contessi, Marcello Carini, Fabrizio Gambardella, Ugo Giacometti, Edoardo Santillana, Jesus Beca Campoy, Tomas Schmitz, Johannes H. Libertucci, Mauro Ho, Henrykim Haan, Simon Mastrangelo, Filiberto Materials (Basel) Article In thirteen different dental clinics in Singapore, Spain, Czech Republic and Italy, 504 patients were selected, and 483 dental implants were placed in maxillary sites after alveolar socket preservation (ASP) procedures with an autologous demineralized tooth extracted as graft material from an innovative Tooth Transformer device was obtained. All procedures used were reported in n°638 Ethical Committee surgical protocol of University of Chieti and approved. After 4 months, at dental implant placing, bone biopsies were performed to evaluate the histologic outcomes, and 12 months after implant loading, global implant survival rate, failure percentage and peri-implant bone loss were detected. After ASP, only 27 post-operative complications were observed and after 4 months, bone biopsy histomorphometric analysis showed a high percentage of bone volume (BV) 43.58 (±12.09), and vital new bone (NB) 32.38 (±17.15) with an absence of inflammation or necrosis areas. Twelve months after loading, only 10 dental implants failed (2.3%), with a 98.2% overall implant survival rate, nine cases showed mucositis (1.8%) and eight showed peri-implantitis (1.6%). At mesial sites, 0.43 mm (±0.83) of bone loss around the implants was detected and 0.23 mm (±0.38) at the distal sites with an average value of 0.37 mm (±0.68) (p > 0.568). Several studies with a longer follow-up will be necessary to confirm the preliminary data observed. However, clinical results seem to suggest that the post-extraction socket preservation procedure using innovative demineralized autologous tooth-derived biomaterial may be a predictable procedure to produce new vital bone able to support dental implant rehabilitation of maxilla edentulous sites. MDPI 2021-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8472708/ /pubmed/34576516 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14185292 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Minetti, Elio
Celko, Martin
Contessi, Marcello
Carini, Fabrizio
Gambardella, Ugo
Giacometti, Edoardo
Santillana, Jesus
Beca Campoy, Tomas
Schmitz, Johannes H.
Libertucci, Mauro
Ho, Henrykim
Haan, Simon
Mastrangelo, Filiberto
Implants Survival Rate in Regenerated Sites with Innovative Graft Biomaterials: 1 Year Follow-Up
title Implants Survival Rate in Regenerated Sites with Innovative Graft Biomaterials: 1 Year Follow-Up
title_full Implants Survival Rate in Regenerated Sites with Innovative Graft Biomaterials: 1 Year Follow-Up
title_fullStr Implants Survival Rate in Regenerated Sites with Innovative Graft Biomaterials: 1 Year Follow-Up
title_full_unstemmed Implants Survival Rate in Regenerated Sites with Innovative Graft Biomaterials: 1 Year Follow-Up
title_short Implants Survival Rate in Regenerated Sites with Innovative Graft Biomaterials: 1 Year Follow-Up
title_sort implants survival rate in regenerated sites with innovative graft biomaterials: 1 year follow-up
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8472708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34576516
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14185292
work_keys_str_mv AT minettielio implantssurvivalrateinregeneratedsiteswithinnovativegraftbiomaterials1yearfollowup
AT celkomartin implantssurvivalrateinregeneratedsiteswithinnovativegraftbiomaterials1yearfollowup
AT contessimarcello implantssurvivalrateinregeneratedsiteswithinnovativegraftbiomaterials1yearfollowup
AT carinifabrizio implantssurvivalrateinregeneratedsiteswithinnovativegraftbiomaterials1yearfollowup
AT gambardellaugo implantssurvivalrateinregeneratedsiteswithinnovativegraftbiomaterials1yearfollowup
AT giacomettiedoardo implantssurvivalrateinregeneratedsiteswithinnovativegraftbiomaterials1yearfollowup
AT santillanajesus implantssurvivalrateinregeneratedsiteswithinnovativegraftbiomaterials1yearfollowup
AT becacampoytomas implantssurvivalrateinregeneratedsiteswithinnovativegraftbiomaterials1yearfollowup
AT schmitzjohannesh implantssurvivalrateinregeneratedsiteswithinnovativegraftbiomaterials1yearfollowup
AT libertuccimauro implantssurvivalrateinregeneratedsiteswithinnovativegraftbiomaterials1yearfollowup
AT hohenrykim implantssurvivalrateinregeneratedsiteswithinnovativegraftbiomaterials1yearfollowup
AT haansimon implantssurvivalrateinregeneratedsiteswithinnovativegraftbiomaterials1yearfollowup
AT mastrangelofiliberto implantssurvivalrateinregeneratedsiteswithinnovativegraftbiomaterials1yearfollowup