Cargando…
Inhibitory Effects of Artificial Sweeteners on Bacterial Quorum Sensing
Despite having been tagged as safe and beneficial, recent evidence remains inconclusive regarding the status of artificial sweeteners and their putative effects on gut microbiota. Gut microorganisms are essential for the normal metabolic functions of their host. These microorganisms communicate with...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8472786/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34576027 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22189863 |
_version_ | 1784574824158330880 |
---|---|
author | Markus, Victor Share, Orr Shagan, Marilou Halpern, Barak Bar, Tal Kramarsky-Winter, Esti Teralı, Kerem Özer, Nazmi Marks, Robert S. Kushmaro, Ariel Golberg, Karina |
author_facet | Markus, Victor Share, Orr Shagan, Marilou Halpern, Barak Bar, Tal Kramarsky-Winter, Esti Teralı, Kerem Özer, Nazmi Marks, Robert S. Kushmaro, Ariel Golberg, Karina |
author_sort | Markus, Victor |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite having been tagged as safe and beneficial, recent evidence remains inconclusive regarding the status of artificial sweeteners and their putative effects on gut microbiota. Gut microorganisms are essential for the normal metabolic functions of their host. These microorganisms communicate within their community and regulate group behaviors via a molecular system termed quorum sensing (QS). In the present study, we aimed to study the effects of artificial sweeteners on this bacterial communication system. Using biosensor assays, biophysical protein characterization methods, microscale thermophoresis, swarming motility assays, growth assays, as well as molecular docking, we show that aspartame, sucralose, and saccharin have significant inhibitory actions on the Gram-negative bacteria N-acyl homoserine lactone-based (AHL) communication system. Our studies indicate that these three artificial sweeteners are not bactericidal. Protein-ligand docking and interaction profiling, using LasR as a representative participating receptor for AHL, suggest that the artificial sweeteners bind to the ligand-binding pocket of the protein, possibly interfering with the proper housing of the native ligand and thus impeding protein folding. Our findings suggest that these artificial sweeteners may affect the balance of the gut microbial community via QS-inhibition. We, therefore, infer an effect of these artificial sweeteners on numerous molecular events that are at the core of intestinal microbial function, and by extension on the host metabolism. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8472786 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84727862021-09-28 Inhibitory Effects of Artificial Sweeteners on Bacterial Quorum Sensing Markus, Victor Share, Orr Shagan, Marilou Halpern, Barak Bar, Tal Kramarsky-Winter, Esti Teralı, Kerem Özer, Nazmi Marks, Robert S. Kushmaro, Ariel Golberg, Karina Int J Mol Sci Article Despite having been tagged as safe and beneficial, recent evidence remains inconclusive regarding the status of artificial sweeteners and their putative effects on gut microbiota. Gut microorganisms are essential for the normal metabolic functions of their host. These microorganisms communicate within their community and regulate group behaviors via a molecular system termed quorum sensing (QS). In the present study, we aimed to study the effects of artificial sweeteners on this bacterial communication system. Using biosensor assays, biophysical protein characterization methods, microscale thermophoresis, swarming motility assays, growth assays, as well as molecular docking, we show that aspartame, sucralose, and saccharin have significant inhibitory actions on the Gram-negative bacteria N-acyl homoserine lactone-based (AHL) communication system. Our studies indicate that these three artificial sweeteners are not bactericidal. Protein-ligand docking and interaction profiling, using LasR as a representative participating receptor for AHL, suggest that the artificial sweeteners bind to the ligand-binding pocket of the protein, possibly interfering with the proper housing of the native ligand and thus impeding protein folding. Our findings suggest that these artificial sweeteners may affect the balance of the gut microbial community via QS-inhibition. We, therefore, infer an effect of these artificial sweeteners on numerous molecular events that are at the core of intestinal microbial function, and by extension on the host metabolism. MDPI 2021-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8472786/ /pubmed/34576027 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22189863 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Markus, Victor Share, Orr Shagan, Marilou Halpern, Barak Bar, Tal Kramarsky-Winter, Esti Teralı, Kerem Özer, Nazmi Marks, Robert S. Kushmaro, Ariel Golberg, Karina Inhibitory Effects of Artificial Sweeteners on Bacterial Quorum Sensing |
title | Inhibitory Effects of Artificial Sweeteners on Bacterial Quorum Sensing |
title_full | Inhibitory Effects of Artificial Sweeteners on Bacterial Quorum Sensing |
title_fullStr | Inhibitory Effects of Artificial Sweeteners on Bacterial Quorum Sensing |
title_full_unstemmed | Inhibitory Effects of Artificial Sweeteners on Bacterial Quorum Sensing |
title_short | Inhibitory Effects of Artificial Sweeteners on Bacterial Quorum Sensing |
title_sort | inhibitory effects of artificial sweeteners on bacterial quorum sensing |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8472786/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34576027 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22189863 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT markusvictor inhibitoryeffectsofartificialsweetenersonbacterialquorumsensing AT shareorr inhibitoryeffectsofartificialsweetenersonbacterialquorumsensing AT shaganmarilou inhibitoryeffectsofartificialsweetenersonbacterialquorumsensing AT halpernbarak inhibitoryeffectsofartificialsweetenersonbacterialquorumsensing AT bartal inhibitoryeffectsofartificialsweetenersonbacterialquorumsensing AT kramarskywinteresti inhibitoryeffectsofartificialsweetenersonbacterialquorumsensing AT teralıkerem inhibitoryeffectsofartificialsweetenersonbacterialquorumsensing AT ozernazmi inhibitoryeffectsofartificialsweetenersonbacterialquorumsensing AT marksroberts inhibitoryeffectsofartificialsweetenersonbacterialquorumsensing AT kushmaroariel inhibitoryeffectsofartificialsweetenersonbacterialquorumsensing AT golbergkarina inhibitoryeffectsofartificialsweetenersonbacterialquorumsensing |