Cargando…

Safety and Efficacy of Spray Intranasal Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Although influenza is a major public health concern, little is known about the use of spray live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) among adults. For this reason, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of LAIV, especially in adults with/without cli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Perego, Giulia, Vigezzi, Giacomo Pietro, Cocciolo, Giulia, Chiappa, Federica, Salvati, Stefano, Balzarini, Federica, Odone, Anna, Signorelli, Carlo, Gianfredi, Vincenza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8472940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34579235
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9090998
_version_ 1784574863301672960
author Perego, Giulia
Vigezzi, Giacomo Pietro
Cocciolo, Giulia
Chiappa, Federica
Salvati, Stefano
Balzarini, Federica
Odone, Anna
Signorelli, Carlo
Gianfredi, Vincenza
author_facet Perego, Giulia
Vigezzi, Giacomo Pietro
Cocciolo, Giulia
Chiappa, Federica
Salvati, Stefano
Balzarini, Federica
Odone, Anna
Signorelli, Carlo
Gianfredi, Vincenza
author_sort Perego, Giulia
collection PubMed
description Although influenza is a major public health concern, little is known about the use of spray live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) among adults. For this reason, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of LAIV, especially in adults with/without clinical conditions and children <2 years, with the final aim of possibly extending the clinical indications. PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus were the two databases consulted through February 2021. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. A critical appraisal was conducted. Analyses were performed by using ProMeta3 software. Twenty-two studies were included, showing that LAIV was associated with a higher probability of seroconversion when compared with a placebo and considering the A/H1N1 serotype (pooled OR = 2.26 (95% CI = 1.12–4.54), p-value = 0.022; based on 488 participants, without heterogeneity (I2 = 0.0%)). The meta-analysis also confirmed no significant association with systemic adverse events. Only rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, and sore throat were significantly associated with LAIV compared to the placebo. Despite limited available evidence, LAIV has proved to be a safe and effective flu vaccination, also due to its very low invasiveness, and our review’s results can be considered a starting point for guiding future research and shaping forthcoming vaccination campaigns.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8472940
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84729402021-09-28 Safety and Efficacy of Spray Intranasal Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Perego, Giulia Vigezzi, Giacomo Pietro Cocciolo, Giulia Chiappa, Federica Salvati, Stefano Balzarini, Federica Odone, Anna Signorelli, Carlo Gianfredi, Vincenza Vaccines (Basel) Review Although influenza is a major public health concern, little is known about the use of spray live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) among adults. For this reason, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of LAIV, especially in adults with/without clinical conditions and children <2 years, with the final aim of possibly extending the clinical indications. PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus were the two databases consulted through February 2021. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. A critical appraisal was conducted. Analyses were performed by using ProMeta3 software. Twenty-two studies were included, showing that LAIV was associated with a higher probability of seroconversion when compared with a placebo and considering the A/H1N1 serotype (pooled OR = 2.26 (95% CI = 1.12–4.54), p-value = 0.022; based on 488 participants, without heterogeneity (I2 = 0.0%)). The meta-analysis also confirmed no significant association with systemic adverse events. Only rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, and sore throat were significantly associated with LAIV compared to the placebo. Despite limited available evidence, LAIV has proved to be a safe and effective flu vaccination, also due to its very low invasiveness, and our review’s results can be considered a starting point for guiding future research and shaping forthcoming vaccination campaigns. MDPI 2021-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8472940/ /pubmed/34579235 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9090998 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Perego, Giulia
Vigezzi, Giacomo Pietro
Cocciolo, Giulia
Chiappa, Federica
Salvati, Stefano
Balzarini, Federica
Odone, Anna
Signorelli, Carlo
Gianfredi, Vincenza
Safety and Efficacy of Spray Intranasal Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Safety and Efficacy of Spray Intranasal Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Safety and Efficacy of Spray Intranasal Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Safety and Efficacy of Spray Intranasal Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Safety and Efficacy of Spray Intranasal Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Safety and Efficacy of Spray Intranasal Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort safety and efficacy of spray intranasal live attenuated influenza vaccine: systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8472940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34579235
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9090998
work_keys_str_mv AT peregogiulia safetyandefficacyofsprayintranasalliveattenuatedinfluenzavaccinesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vigezzigiacomopietro safetyandefficacyofsprayintranasalliveattenuatedinfluenzavaccinesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT cocciologiulia safetyandefficacyofsprayintranasalliveattenuatedinfluenzavaccinesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chiappafederica safetyandefficacyofsprayintranasalliveattenuatedinfluenzavaccinesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT salvatistefano safetyandefficacyofsprayintranasalliveattenuatedinfluenzavaccinesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT balzarinifederica safetyandefficacyofsprayintranasalliveattenuatedinfluenzavaccinesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT odoneanna safetyandefficacyofsprayintranasalliveattenuatedinfluenzavaccinesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT signorellicarlo safetyandefficacyofsprayintranasalliveattenuatedinfluenzavaccinesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gianfredivincenza safetyandefficacyofsprayintranasalliveattenuatedinfluenzavaccinesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis