Cargando…
UAV Block Geometry Design and Camera Calibration: A Simulation Study
Acknowledged guidelines and standards such as those formerly governing project planning in analogue aerial photogrammetry are still missing in UAV photogrammetry. The reasons are many, from a great variety of projects goals to the number of parameters involved: camera features, flight plan design, b...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8473092/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34577297 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21186090 |
_version_ | 1784574901933309952 |
---|---|
author | Roncella, Riccardo Forlani, Gianfranco |
author_facet | Roncella, Riccardo Forlani, Gianfranco |
author_sort | Roncella, Riccardo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Acknowledged guidelines and standards such as those formerly governing project planning in analogue aerial photogrammetry are still missing in UAV photogrammetry. The reasons are many, from a great variety of projects goals to the number of parameters involved: camera features, flight plan design, block control and georeferencing options, Structure from Motion settings, etc. Above all, perhaps, stands camera calibration with the alternative between pre- and on-the-job approaches. In this paper we present a Monte Carlo simulation study where the accuracy estimation of camera parameters and tie points’ ground coordinates is evaluated as a function of various project parameters. A set of UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle) synthetic photogrammetric blocks, built by varying terrain shape, surveyed area shape, block control (ground and aerial), strip type (longitudinal, cross and oblique), image observation and control data precision has been synthetically generated, overall considering 144 combinations in on-the-job self-calibration. Bias in ground coordinates (dome effect) due to inaccurate pre-calibration has also been investigated. Under the test scenario, the accuracy gap between different block configurations can be close to an order of magnitude. Oblique imaging is confirmed as key requisite in flat terrain, while ground control density is not. Aerial control by accurate camera station positions is overall more accurate and efficient than GCP in flat terrain. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8473092 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84730922021-09-28 UAV Block Geometry Design and Camera Calibration: A Simulation Study Roncella, Riccardo Forlani, Gianfranco Sensors (Basel) Article Acknowledged guidelines and standards such as those formerly governing project planning in analogue aerial photogrammetry are still missing in UAV photogrammetry. The reasons are many, from a great variety of projects goals to the number of parameters involved: camera features, flight plan design, block control and georeferencing options, Structure from Motion settings, etc. Above all, perhaps, stands camera calibration with the alternative between pre- and on-the-job approaches. In this paper we present a Monte Carlo simulation study where the accuracy estimation of camera parameters and tie points’ ground coordinates is evaluated as a function of various project parameters. A set of UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle) synthetic photogrammetric blocks, built by varying terrain shape, surveyed area shape, block control (ground and aerial), strip type (longitudinal, cross and oblique), image observation and control data precision has been synthetically generated, overall considering 144 combinations in on-the-job self-calibration. Bias in ground coordinates (dome effect) due to inaccurate pre-calibration has also been investigated. Under the test scenario, the accuracy gap between different block configurations can be close to an order of magnitude. Oblique imaging is confirmed as key requisite in flat terrain, while ground control density is not. Aerial control by accurate camera station positions is overall more accurate and efficient than GCP in flat terrain. MDPI 2021-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8473092/ /pubmed/34577297 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21186090 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Roncella, Riccardo Forlani, Gianfranco UAV Block Geometry Design and Camera Calibration: A Simulation Study |
title | UAV Block Geometry Design and Camera Calibration: A Simulation Study |
title_full | UAV Block Geometry Design and Camera Calibration: A Simulation Study |
title_fullStr | UAV Block Geometry Design and Camera Calibration: A Simulation Study |
title_full_unstemmed | UAV Block Geometry Design and Camera Calibration: A Simulation Study |
title_short | UAV Block Geometry Design and Camera Calibration: A Simulation Study |
title_sort | uav block geometry design and camera calibration: a simulation study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8473092/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34577297 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21186090 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT roncellariccardo uavblockgeometrydesignandcameracalibrationasimulationstudy AT forlanigianfranco uavblockgeometrydesignandcameracalibrationasimulationstudy |