Cargando…

UAV Block Geometry Design and Camera Calibration: A Simulation Study

Acknowledged guidelines and standards such as those formerly governing project planning in analogue aerial photogrammetry are still missing in UAV photogrammetry. The reasons are many, from a great variety of projects goals to the number of parameters involved: camera features, flight plan design, b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roncella, Riccardo, Forlani, Gianfranco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8473092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34577297
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21186090
_version_ 1784574901933309952
author Roncella, Riccardo
Forlani, Gianfranco
author_facet Roncella, Riccardo
Forlani, Gianfranco
author_sort Roncella, Riccardo
collection PubMed
description Acknowledged guidelines and standards such as those formerly governing project planning in analogue aerial photogrammetry are still missing in UAV photogrammetry. The reasons are many, from a great variety of projects goals to the number of parameters involved: camera features, flight plan design, block control and georeferencing options, Structure from Motion settings, etc. Above all, perhaps, stands camera calibration with the alternative between pre- and on-the-job approaches. In this paper we present a Monte Carlo simulation study where the accuracy estimation of camera parameters and tie points’ ground coordinates is evaluated as a function of various project parameters. A set of UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle) synthetic photogrammetric blocks, built by varying terrain shape, surveyed area shape, block control (ground and aerial), strip type (longitudinal, cross and oblique), image observation and control data precision has been synthetically generated, overall considering 144 combinations in on-the-job self-calibration. Bias in ground coordinates (dome effect) due to inaccurate pre-calibration has also been investigated. Under the test scenario, the accuracy gap between different block configurations can be close to an order of magnitude. Oblique imaging is confirmed as key requisite in flat terrain, while ground control density is not. Aerial control by accurate camera station positions is overall more accurate and efficient than GCP in flat terrain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8473092
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84730922021-09-28 UAV Block Geometry Design and Camera Calibration: A Simulation Study Roncella, Riccardo Forlani, Gianfranco Sensors (Basel) Article Acknowledged guidelines and standards such as those formerly governing project planning in analogue aerial photogrammetry are still missing in UAV photogrammetry. The reasons are many, from a great variety of projects goals to the number of parameters involved: camera features, flight plan design, block control and georeferencing options, Structure from Motion settings, etc. Above all, perhaps, stands camera calibration with the alternative between pre- and on-the-job approaches. In this paper we present a Monte Carlo simulation study where the accuracy estimation of camera parameters and tie points’ ground coordinates is evaluated as a function of various project parameters. A set of UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle) synthetic photogrammetric blocks, built by varying terrain shape, surveyed area shape, block control (ground and aerial), strip type (longitudinal, cross and oblique), image observation and control data precision has been synthetically generated, overall considering 144 combinations in on-the-job self-calibration. Bias in ground coordinates (dome effect) due to inaccurate pre-calibration has also been investigated. Under the test scenario, the accuracy gap between different block configurations can be close to an order of magnitude. Oblique imaging is confirmed as key requisite in flat terrain, while ground control density is not. Aerial control by accurate camera station positions is overall more accurate and efficient than GCP in flat terrain. MDPI 2021-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8473092/ /pubmed/34577297 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21186090 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Roncella, Riccardo
Forlani, Gianfranco
UAV Block Geometry Design and Camera Calibration: A Simulation Study
title UAV Block Geometry Design and Camera Calibration: A Simulation Study
title_full UAV Block Geometry Design and Camera Calibration: A Simulation Study
title_fullStr UAV Block Geometry Design and Camera Calibration: A Simulation Study
title_full_unstemmed UAV Block Geometry Design and Camera Calibration: A Simulation Study
title_short UAV Block Geometry Design and Camera Calibration: A Simulation Study
title_sort uav block geometry design and camera calibration: a simulation study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8473092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34577297
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21186090
work_keys_str_mv AT roncellariccardo uavblockgeometrydesignandcameracalibrationasimulationstudy
AT forlanigianfranco uavblockgeometrydesignandcameracalibrationasimulationstudy