Cargando…

A Review of Australian Tick Vaccine Research

Tick vaccine research in Australia has demonstrated leadership worldwide through the development of the first anti-tick vaccine in the 1990s. Australia’s Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation’s (CSIRO) research led to the development of vaccines and/or precursors of vaccines (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Tabor, Ala E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8473225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34579266
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9091030
_version_ 1784574936907513856
author Tabor, Ala E.
author_facet Tabor, Ala E.
author_sort Tabor, Ala E.
collection PubMed
description Tick vaccine research in Australia has demonstrated leadership worldwide through the development of the first anti-tick vaccine in the 1990s. Australia’s Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation’s (CSIRO) research led to the development of vaccines and/or precursors of vaccines (such as crude extracts) for both the cattle tick and the paralysis tick. CSIRO commercialised the Bm86 vaccine in the early 1990s for Rhipicephalus australis; however, issues with dosing and lack of global conservation led to the market closure of Tick-GARD in Australia. New research programs arose both locally and globally. The Australian paralysis tick Ixodes holocyclus has perplexed research veterinarians since the 1920s; however, not until the 2000s did biotechnology exist to elucidate the neurotoxin—holocyclotoxin family of toxins leading to a proof of concept vaccine cocktail. This review revisits these discoveries and describes tributes to deceased tick vaccine protagonists in Australia, including Sir Clunies Ross, Dr Bernard Stone and Dr David Kemp.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8473225
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84732252021-09-28 A Review of Australian Tick Vaccine Research Tabor, Ala E. Vaccines (Basel) Review Tick vaccine research in Australia has demonstrated leadership worldwide through the development of the first anti-tick vaccine in the 1990s. Australia’s Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation’s (CSIRO) research led to the development of vaccines and/or precursors of vaccines (such as crude extracts) for both the cattle tick and the paralysis tick. CSIRO commercialised the Bm86 vaccine in the early 1990s for Rhipicephalus australis; however, issues with dosing and lack of global conservation led to the market closure of Tick-GARD in Australia. New research programs arose both locally and globally. The Australian paralysis tick Ixodes holocyclus has perplexed research veterinarians since the 1920s; however, not until the 2000s did biotechnology exist to elucidate the neurotoxin—holocyclotoxin family of toxins leading to a proof of concept vaccine cocktail. This review revisits these discoveries and describes tributes to deceased tick vaccine protagonists in Australia, including Sir Clunies Ross, Dr Bernard Stone and Dr David Kemp. MDPI 2021-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8473225/ /pubmed/34579266 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9091030 Text en © 2021 by the author. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Tabor, Ala E.
A Review of Australian Tick Vaccine Research
title A Review of Australian Tick Vaccine Research
title_full A Review of Australian Tick Vaccine Research
title_fullStr A Review of Australian Tick Vaccine Research
title_full_unstemmed A Review of Australian Tick Vaccine Research
title_short A Review of Australian Tick Vaccine Research
title_sort review of australian tick vaccine research
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8473225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34579266
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9091030
work_keys_str_mv AT taboralae areviewofaustraliantickvaccineresearch
AT taboralae reviewofaustraliantickvaccineresearch