Cargando…

Organisation of Multi-Mycotoxin Proficiency Tests: Evaluation of the Performances of the Laboratories Using the Triple A Rating Approach

In accordance with the International Standard Organization ISO 17043, two proficiency tests (PTs) for the simultaneous determination of aflatoxins (AFB(1), AFB(2), AFG(1), AFG(2)); deoxynivalenol; fumonisins FB(1), FB(2,) and B(3); ochratoxin A, the T-2 toxin; and the HT-2 toxin were conducted in 20...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tangni, Emmanuel K., Huybrechts, Bart, Masquelier, Julien, Van Hoeck, Els
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8473274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34564596
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins13090591
_version_ 1784574950991986688
author Tangni, Emmanuel K.
Huybrechts, Bart
Masquelier, Julien
Van Hoeck, Els
author_facet Tangni, Emmanuel K.
Huybrechts, Bart
Masquelier, Julien
Van Hoeck, Els
author_sort Tangni, Emmanuel K.
collection PubMed
description In accordance with the International Standard Organization ISO 17043, two proficiency tests (PTs) for the simultaneous determination of aflatoxins (AFB(1), AFB(2), AFG(1), AFG(2)); deoxynivalenol; fumonisins FB(1), FB(2,) and B(3); ochratoxin A, the T-2 toxin; and the HT-2 toxin were conducted in 2019 and 2020 using cornflakes and rusk flours that were prepared in house. The homogeneity and the stability of these materials were verified according to the criteria laid down in ISO 13528 using randomly selected samples. Most of the targeted toxins were found to be homogenously distributed in both materials with no significant changes during the timescale of the PTs. Next, the materials were distributed to approximately 25 participating laboratories from Europe, Canada, and the United States. The obtained datasets were computed using robust statistics. The outliers were checked and removed, and the toxin concentrations were assigned as the consensus value of the results of the participants at Horwitz ratios <1.2. The z scores were generated for all mycotoxins, and the results were pooled to calculate the relative sum of squared z scores (SZ2) indexes and were clustered according to the triple A rating. Overall, at least 80% of the participating laboratories achieved good and acceptable performances. The most frequent categories assigned to good performances (SZ2 ≤ 2) were AAA (51%) and BAA (13%). Clusters of BBA + CBA (6%) included laboratories reporting acceptable z scores <90% of the total z scores for less than 90% or 50% of the mycotoxins targeted in the 2 matrices. The triple A rating seems to be appropriate in evaluating the performances of laboratories involved in multi-mycotoxin analyses. Accredited and non-accredited analytical methods achieved good and acceptable performances.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8473274
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84732742021-09-28 Organisation of Multi-Mycotoxin Proficiency Tests: Evaluation of the Performances of the Laboratories Using the Triple A Rating Approach Tangni, Emmanuel K. Huybrechts, Bart Masquelier, Julien Van Hoeck, Els Toxins (Basel) Article In accordance with the International Standard Organization ISO 17043, two proficiency tests (PTs) for the simultaneous determination of aflatoxins (AFB(1), AFB(2), AFG(1), AFG(2)); deoxynivalenol; fumonisins FB(1), FB(2,) and B(3); ochratoxin A, the T-2 toxin; and the HT-2 toxin were conducted in 2019 and 2020 using cornflakes and rusk flours that were prepared in house. The homogeneity and the stability of these materials were verified according to the criteria laid down in ISO 13528 using randomly selected samples. Most of the targeted toxins were found to be homogenously distributed in both materials with no significant changes during the timescale of the PTs. Next, the materials were distributed to approximately 25 participating laboratories from Europe, Canada, and the United States. The obtained datasets were computed using robust statistics. The outliers were checked and removed, and the toxin concentrations were assigned as the consensus value of the results of the participants at Horwitz ratios <1.2. The z scores were generated for all mycotoxins, and the results were pooled to calculate the relative sum of squared z scores (SZ2) indexes and were clustered according to the triple A rating. Overall, at least 80% of the participating laboratories achieved good and acceptable performances. The most frequent categories assigned to good performances (SZ2 ≤ 2) were AAA (51%) and BAA (13%). Clusters of BBA + CBA (6%) included laboratories reporting acceptable z scores <90% of the total z scores for less than 90% or 50% of the mycotoxins targeted in the 2 matrices. The triple A rating seems to be appropriate in evaluating the performances of laboratories involved in multi-mycotoxin analyses. Accredited and non-accredited analytical methods achieved good and acceptable performances. MDPI 2021-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8473274/ /pubmed/34564596 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins13090591 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Tangni, Emmanuel K.
Huybrechts, Bart
Masquelier, Julien
Van Hoeck, Els
Organisation of Multi-Mycotoxin Proficiency Tests: Evaluation of the Performances of the Laboratories Using the Triple A Rating Approach
title Organisation of Multi-Mycotoxin Proficiency Tests: Evaluation of the Performances of the Laboratories Using the Triple A Rating Approach
title_full Organisation of Multi-Mycotoxin Proficiency Tests: Evaluation of the Performances of the Laboratories Using the Triple A Rating Approach
title_fullStr Organisation of Multi-Mycotoxin Proficiency Tests: Evaluation of the Performances of the Laboratories Using the Triple A Rating Approach
title_full_unstemmed Organisation of Multi-Mycotoxin Proficiency Tests: Evaluation of the Performances of the Laboratories Using the Triple A Rating Approach
title_short Organisation of Multi-Mycotoxin Proficiency Tests: Evaluation of the Performances of the Laboratories Using the Triple A Rating Approach
title_sort organisation of multi-mycotoxin proficiency tests: evaluation of the performances of the laboratories using the triple a rating approach
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8473274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34564596
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins13090591
work_keys_str_mv AT tangniemmanuelk organisationofmultimycotoxinproficiencytestsevaluationoftheperformancesofthelaboratoriesusingthetriplearatingapproach
AT huybrechtsbart organisationofmultimycotoxinproficiencytestsevaluationoftheperformancesofthelaboratoriesusingthetriplearatingapproach
AT masquelierjulien organisationofmultimycotoxinproficiencytestsevaluationoftheperformancesofthelaboratoriesusingthetriplearatingapproach
AT vanhoeckels organisationofmultimycotoxinproficiencytestsevaluationoftheperformancesofthelaboratoriesusingthetriplearatingapproach