Cargando…

High-Frequency Impulse Therapy for Treatment of Chronic Back Pain: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Pilot Study

PURPOSE: This study aims to examine high-frequency impulse therapy (HFIT) impact on pain and function among patients undergoing care for chronic low back pain (CLBP). METHODS: A pilot randomized-controlled trial of HFIT system versus sham was conducted across 5 orthopedic and pain center sites in Ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amirdelfan, Kasra, Hong, Mindy, Tay, Bobby, Reddy, Surekha, Reddy, Vinay, Yang, Michael, Khanna, Krishn, Shirvalkar, Prasad, Abrecht, Christopher, Gulati, Amitabh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8473565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34588809
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S325230
_version_ 1784575016949514240
author Amirdelfan, Kasra
Hong, Mindy
Tay, Bobby
Reddy, Surekha
Reddy, Vinay
Yang, Michael
Khanna, Krishn
Shirvalkar, Prasad
Abrecht, Christopher
Gulati, Amitabh
author_facet Amirdelfan, Kasra
Hong, Mindy
Tay, Bobby
Reddy, Surekha
Reddy, Vinay
Yang, Michael
Khanna, Krishn
Shirvalkar, Prasad
Abrecht, Christopher
Gulati, Amitabh
author_sort Amirdelfan, Kasra
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study aims to examine high-frequency impulse therapy (HFIT) impact on pain and function among patients undergoing care for chronic low back pain (CLBP). METHODS: A pilot randomized-controlled trial of HFIT system versus sham was conducted across 5 orthopedic and pain center sites in California, USA. Thirty-six patients seeking clinical care for CLBP were randomized. Primary outcome was function measured by the Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT). Secondary outcomes were function (Timed Up and Go [TUG] and Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]), pain (Numerical Rating Scale [NRS]), quality of life (Patient Global Impression of Change [PGIC]), and device use. Patients were assessed at baseline and every week for 4 weeks of follow-up. Mann–Whitney U-test was used to analyze changes in each outcome. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to assess the effect of treatment over time. RESULTS: The average age of subjects was 53.9 ± 15.7 (mean ± SD) years, with 12.1 ± 8.8 years of chronic low back pain. Patients who received an HFIT device had a significantly higher 6MWT score at weeks 2 [Cohen’s d (95% CI): 0.33 (0.02, 0.61)], 3 [0.32 (0.01, 0.59)] and 4 [0.31 (0.01, 0.60)], respectively, as compared to their baseline scores (p < 0.05). Patients in the treatment group had significantly lower TUG scores at week 3 [0.30 (0.04, 0.57)] and significantly lower NRS scores at weeks 2 [0.34 (0.02, 0.58)] and 4 [0.41 (0.10, 0.67)] (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: A larger-scale RCT can build on the findings of this study to test whether HFIT is effective in reducing pain and improving function in CLBP patients. This study shows encouraging evidence of functional improvement and reduction in pain in subjects who used HFIT. The efficacy and minimally invasive nature of HFIT is anticipated to substantially improve the management of CLBP patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8473565
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84735652021-09-28 High-Frequency Impulse Therapy for Treatment of Chronic Back Pain: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Pilot Study Amirdelfan, Kasra Hong, Mindy Tay, Bobby Reddy, Surekha Reddy, Vinay Yang, Michael Khanna, Krishn Shirvalkar, Prasad Abrecht, Christopher Gulati, Amitabh J Pain Res Clinical Trial Report PURPOSE: This study aims to examine high-frequency impulse therapy (HFIT) impact on pain and function among patients undergoing care for chronic low back pain (CLBP). METHODS: A pilot randomized-controlled trial of HFIT system versus sham was conducted across 5 orthopedic and pain center sites in California, USA. Thirty-six patients seeking clinical care for CLBP were randomized. Primary outcome was function measured by the Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT). Secondary outcomes were function (Timed Up and Go [TUG] and Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]), pain (Numerical Rating Scale [NRS]), quality of life (Patient Global Impression of Change [PGIC]), and device use. Patients were assessed at baseline and every week for 4 weeks of follow-up. Mann–Whitney U-test was used to analyze changes in each outcome. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to assess the effect of treatment over time. RESULTS: The average age of subjects was 53.9 ± 15.7 (mean ± SD) years, with 12.1 ± 8.8 years of chronic low back pain. Patients who received an HFIT device had a significantly higher 6MWT score at weeks 2 [Cohen’s d (95% CI): 0.33 (0.02, 0.61)], 3 [0.32 (0.01, 0.59)] and 4 [0.31 (0.01, 0.60)], respectively, as compared to their baseline scores (p < 0.05). Patients in the treatment group had significantly lower TUG scores at week 3 [0.30 (0.04, 0.57)] and significantly lower NRS scores at weeks 2 [0.34 (0.02, 0.58)] and 4 [0.41 (0.10, 0.67)] (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: A larger-scale RCT can build on the findings of this study to test whether HFIT is effective in reducing pain and improving function in CLBP patients. This study shows encouraging evidence of functional improvement and reduction in pain in subjects who used HFIT. The efficacy and minimally invasive nature of HFIT is anticipated to substantially improve the management of CLBP patients. Dove 2021-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8473565/ /pubmed/34588809 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S325230 Text en © 2021 Amirdelfan et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Clinical Trial Report
Amirdelfan, Kasra
Hong, Mindy
Tay, Bobby
Reddy, Surekha
Reddy, Vinay
Yang, Michael
Khanna, Krishn
Shirvalkar, Prasad
Abrecht, Christopher
Gulati, Amitabh
High-Frequency Impulse Therapy for Treatment of Chronic Back Pain: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Pilot Study
title High-Frequency Impulse Therapy for Treatment of Chronic Back Pain: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Pilot Study
title_full High-Frequency Impulse Therapy for Treatment of Chronic Back Pain: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Pilot Study
title_fullStr High-Frequency Impulse Therapy for Treatment of Chronic Back Pain: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed High-Frequency Impulse Therapy for Treatment of Chronic Back Pain: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Pilot Study
title_short High-Frequency Impulse Therapy for Treatment of Chronic Back Pain: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Pilot Study
title_sort high-frequency impulse therapy for treatment of chronic back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled pilot study
topic Clinical Trial Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8473565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34588809
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S325230
work_keys_str_mv AT amirdelfankasra highfrequencyimpulsetherapyfortreatmentofchronicbackpainamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT hongmindy highfrequencyimpulsetherapyfortreatmentofchronicbackpainamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT taybobby highfrequencyimpulsetherapyfortreatmentofchronicbackpainamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT reddysurekha highfrequencyimpulsetherapyfortreatmentofchronicbackpainamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT reddyvinay highfrequencyimpulsetherapyfortreatmentofchronicbackpainamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT yangmichael highfrequencyimpulsetherapyfortreatmentofchronicbackpainamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT khannakrishn highfrequencyimpulsetherapyfortreatmentofchronicbackpainamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT shirvalkarprasad highfrequencyimpulsetherapyfortreatmentofchronicbackpainamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT abrechtchristopher highfrequencyimpulsetherapyfortreatmentofchronicbackpainamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT gulatiamitabh highfrequencyimpulsetherapyfortreatmentofchronicbackpainamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledpilotstudy