Cargando…
Influence of Augmented Visual Feedback on Balance Control in Unilateral Transfemoral Amputees
Patients with a lower limb amputation rely more on visual feedback to maintain balance than able-bodied individuals. Altering this sensory modality in amputees thus results in a disrupted postural control. However, little is known about how lower limb amputees cope with augmented visual information...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8473899/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34588950 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.727527 |
_version_ | 1784575098325303296 |
---|---|
author | Fuchs, Katharina Krauskopf, Thomas Lauck, Torben B. Klein, Lukas Mueller, Marc Herget, Georg W. Von Tscharner, Vinzenz Stutzig, Norman Stieglitz, Thomas Pasluosta, Cristian |
author_facet | Fuchs, Katharina Krauskopf, Thomas Lauck, Torben B. Klein, Lukas Mueller, Marc Herget, Georg W. Von Tscharner, Vinzenz Stutzig, Norman Stieglitz, Thomas Pasluosta, Cristian |
author_sort | Fuchs, Katharina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Patients with a lower limb amputation rely more on visual feedback to maintain balance than able-bodied individuals. Altering this sensory modality in amputees thus results in a disrupted postural control. However, little is known about how lower limb amputees cope with augmented visual information during balance tasks. In this study, we investigated how unilateral transfemoral amputees incorporate visual feedback of their center of pressure (CoP) position during quiet standing. Ten transfemoral amputees and ten age-matched able-bodied participants were provided with real-time visual feedback of the position of their CoP while standing on a pressure platform. Their task was to keep their CoP within a small circle in the center of a computer screen placed at eye level, which could be achieved by minimizing their postural sway. The visual feedback was then delayed by 250 and 500 ms and was combined with a two- and five-fold amplification of the CoP displacements. Trials with eyes open without augmented visual feedback as well as with eyes closed were further performed. The overall performance was measured by computing the sway area. We further quantified the dynamics of the CoP adjustments using the entropic half-life (EnHL) to study possible physiological mechanisms behind postural control. Amputees showed an increased sway area compared to the control group. The EnHL values of the amputated leg were significantly higher than those of the intact leg and the dominant and non-dominant leg of controls. This indicates lower dynamics in the CoP adjustments of the amputated leg, which was compensated by increasing the dynamics of the CoP adjustments of the intact leg. Receiving real-time visual feedback of the CoP position did not significantly reduce the sway area neither in amputees nor in controls when comparing with the eyes open condition without visual feedback of the CoP position. Further, with increasing delay and amplification, both groups were able to compensate for small visual perturbations, yet their dynamics were significantly lower when additional information was not received in a physiologically relevant time frame. These findings may be used for future design of neurorehabilitation programs to restore sensory feedback in lower limb amputees. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8473899 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84738992021-09-28 Influence of Augmented Visual Feedback on Balance Control in Unilateral Transfemoral Amputees Fuchs, Katharina Krauskopf, Thomas Lauck, Torben B. Klein, Lukas Mueller, Marc Herget, Georg W. Von Tscharner, Vinzenz Stutzig, Norman Stieglitz, Thomas Pasluosta, Cristian Front Neurosci Neuroscience Patients with a lower limb amputation rely more on visual feedback to maintain balance than able-bodied individuals. Altering this sensory modality in amputees thus results in a disrupted postural control. However, little is known about how lower limb amputees cope with augmented visual information during balance tasks. In this study, we investigated how unilateral transfemoral amputees incorporate visual feedback of their center of pressure (CoP) position during quiet standing. Ten transfemoral amputees and ten age-matched able-bodied participants were provided with real-time visual feedback of the position of their CoP while standing on a pressure platform. Their task was to keep their CoP within a small circle in the center of a computer screen placed at eye level, which could be achieved by minimizing their postural sway. The visual feedback was then delayed by 250 and 500 ms and was combined with a two- and five-fold amplification of the CoP displacements. Trials with eyes open without augmented visual feedback as well as with eyes closed were further performed. The overall performance was measured by computing the sway area. We further quantified the dynamics of the CoP adjustments using the entropic half-life (EnHL) to study possible physiological mechanisms behind postural control. Amputees showed an increased sway area compared to the control group. The EnHL values of the amputated leg were significantly higher than those of the intact leg and the dominant and non-dominant leg of controls. This indicates lower dynamics in the CoP adjustments of the amputated leg, which was compensated by increasing the dynamics of the CoP adjustments of the intact leg. Receiving real-time visual feedback of the CoP position did not significantly reduce the sway area neither in amputees nor in controls when comparing with the eyes open condition without visual feedback of the CoP position. Further, with increasing delay and amplification, both groups were able to compensate for small visual perturbations, yet their dynamics were significantly lower when additional information was not received in a physiologically relevant time frame. These findings may be used for future design of neurorehabilitation programs to restore sensory feedback in lower limb amputees. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8473899/ /pubmed/34588950 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.727527 Text en Copyright © 2021 Fuchs, Krauskopf, Lauck, Klein, Mueller, Herget, Von Tscharner, Stutzig, Stieglitz and Pasluosta. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Fuchs, Katharina Krauskopf, Thomas Lauck, Torben B. Klein, Lukas Mueller, Marc Herget, Georg W. Von Tscharner, Vinzenz Stutzig, Norman Stieglitz, Thomas Pasluosta, Cristian Influence of Augmented Visual Feedback on Balance Control in Unilateral Transfemoral Amputees |
title | Influence of Augmented Visual Feedback on Balance Control in Unilateral Transfemoral Amputees |
title_full | Influence of Augmented Visual Feedback on Balance Control in Unilateral Transfemoral Amputees |
title_fullStr | Influence of Augmented Visual Feedback on Balance Control in Unilateral Transfemoral Amputees |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of Augmented Visual Feedback on Balance Control in Unilateral Transfemoral Amputees |
title_short | Influence of Augmented Visual Feedback on Balance Control in Unilateral Transfemoral Amputees |
title_sort | influence of augmented visual feedback on balance control in unilateral transfemoral amputees |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8473899/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34588950 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.727527 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fuchskatharina influenceofaugmentedvisualfeedbackonbalancecontrolinunilateraltransfemoralamputees AT krauskopfthomas influenceofaugmentedvisualfeedbackonbalancecontrolinunilateraltransfemoralamputees AT laucktorbenb influenceofaugmentedvisualfeedbackonbalancecontrolinunilateraltransfemoralamputees AT kleinlukas influenceofaugmentedvisualfeedbackonbalancecontrolinunilateraltransfemoralamputees AT muellermarc influenceofaugmentedvisualfeedbackonbalancecontrolinunilateraltransfemoralamputees AT hergetgeorgw influenceofaugmentedvisualfeedbackonbalancecontrolinunilateraltransfemoralamputees AT vontscharnervinzenz influenceofaugmentedvisualfeedbackonbalancecontrolinunilateraltransfemoralamputees AT stutzignorman influenceofaugmentedvisualfeedbackonbalancecontrolinunilateraltransfemoralamputees AT stieglitzthomas influenceofaugmentedvisualfeedbackonbalancecontrolinunilateraltransfemoralamputees AT pasluostacristian influenceofaugmentedvisualfeedbackonbalancecontrolinunilateraltransfemoralamputees |