Cargando…

Influence of Augmented Visual Feedback on Balance Control in Unilateral Transfemoral Amputees

Patients with a lower limb amputation rely more on visual feedback to maintain balance than able-bodied individuals. Altering this sensory modality in amputees thus results in a disrupted postural control. However, little is known about how lower limb amputees cope with augmented visual information...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fuchs, Katharina, Krauskopf, Thomas, Lauck, Torben B., Klein, Lukas, Mueller, Marc, Herget, Georg W., Von Tscharner, Vinzenz, Stutzig, Norman, Stieglitz, Thomas, Pasluosta, Cristian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8473899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34588950
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.727527
_version_ 1784575098325303296
author Fuchs, Katharina
Krauskopf, Thomas
Lauck, Torben B.
Klein, Lukas
Mueller, Marc
Herget, Georg W.
Von Tscharner, Vinzenz
Stutzig, Norman
Stieglitz, Thomas
Pasluosta, Cristian
author_facet Fuchs, Katharina
Krauskopf, Thomas
Lauck, Torben B.
Klein, Lukas
Mueller, Marc
Herget, Georg W.
Von Tscharner, Vinzenz
Stutzig, Norman
Stieglitz, Thomas
Pasluosta, Cristian
author_sort Fuchs, Katharina
collection PubMed
description Patients with a lower limb amputation rely more on visual feedback to maintain balance than able-bodied individuals. Altering this sensory modality in amputees thus results in a disrupted postural control. However, little is known about how lower limb amputees cope with augmented visual information during balance tasks. In this study, we investigated how unilateral transfemoral amputees incorporate visual feedback of their center of pressure (CoP) position during quiet standing. Ten transfemoral amputees and ten age-matched able-bodied participants were provided with real-time visual feedback of the position of their CoP while standing on a pressure platform. Their task was to keep their CoP within a small circle in the center of a computer screen placed at eye level, which could be achieved by minimizing their postural sway. The visual feedback was then delayed by 250 and 500 ms and was combined with a two- and five-fold amplification of the CoP displacements. Trials with eyes open without augmented visual feedback as well as with eyes closed were further performed. The overall performance was measured by computing the sway area. We further quantified the dynamics of the CoP adjustments using the entropic half-life (EnHL) to study possible physiological mechanisms behind postural control. Amputees showed an increased sway area compared to the control group. The EnHL values of the amputated leg were significantly higher than those of the intact leg and the dominant and non-dominant leg of controls. This indicates lower dynamics in the CoP adjustments of the amputated leg, which was compensated by increasing the dynamics of the CoP adjustments of the intact leg. Receiving real-time visual feedback of the CoP position did not significantly reduce the sway area neither in amputees nor in controls when comparing with the eyes open condition without visual feedback of the CoP position. Further, with increasing delay and amplification, both groups were able to compensate for small visual perturbations, yet their dynamics were significantly lower when additional information was not received in a physiologically relevant time frame. These findings may be used for future design of neurorehabilitation programs to restore sensory feedback in lower limb amputees.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8473899
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84738992021-09-28 Influence of Augmented Visual Feedback on Balance Control in Unilateral Transfemoral Amputees Fuchs, Katharina Krauskopf, Thomas Lauck, Torben B. Klein, Lukas Mueller, Marc Herget, Georg W. Von Tscharner, Vinzenz Stutzig, Norman Stieglitz, Thomas Pasluosta, Cristian Front Neurosci Neuroscience Patients with a lower limb amputation rely more on visual feedback to maintain balance than able-bodied individuals. Altering this sensory modality in amputees thus results in a disrupted postural control. However, little is known about how lower limb amputees cope with augmented visual information during balance tasks. In this study, we investigated how unilateral transfemoral amputees incorporate visual feedback of their center of pressure (CoP) position during quiet standing. Ten transfemoral amputees and ten age-matched able-bodied participants were provided with real-time visual feedback of the position of their CoP while standing on a pressure platform. Their task was to keep their CoP within a small circle in the center of a computer screen placed at eye level, which could be achieved by minimizing their postural sway. The visual feedback was then delayed by 250 and 500 ms and was combined with a two- and five-fold amplification of the CoP displacements. Trials with eyes open without augmented visual feedback as well as with eyes closed were further performed. The overall performance was measured by computing the sway area. We further quantified the dynamics of the CoP adjustments using the entropic half-life (EnHL) to study possible physiological mechanisms behind postural control. Amputees showed an increased sway area compared to the control group. The EnHL values of the amputated leg were significantly higher than those of the intact leg and the dominant and non-dominant leg of controls. This indicates lower dynamics in the CoP adjustments of the amputated leg, which was compensated by increasing the dynamics of the CoP adjustments of the intact leg. Receiving real-time visual feedback of the CoP position did not significantly reduce the sway area neither in amputees nor in controls when comparing with the eyes open condition without visual feedback of the CoP position. Further, with increasing delay and amplification, both groups were able to compensate for small visual perturbations, yet their dynamics were significantly lower when additional information was not received in a physiologically relevant time frame. These findings may be used for future design of neurorehabilitation programs to restore sensory feedback in lower limb amputees. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8473899/ /pubmed/34588950 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.727527 Text en Copyright © 2021 Fuchs, Krauskopf, Lauck, Klein, Mueller, Herget, Von Tscharner, Stutzig, Stieglitz and Pasluosta. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Fuchs, Katharina
Krauskopf, Thomas
Lauck, Torben B.
Klein, Lukas
Mueller, Marc
Herget, Georg W.
Von Tscharner, Vinzenz
Stutzig, Norman
Stieglitz, Thomas
Pasluosta, Cristian
Influence of Augmented Visual Feedback on Balance Control in Unilateral Transfemoral Amputees
title Influence of Augmented Visual Feedback on Balance Control in Unilateral Transfemoral Amputees
title_full Influence of Augmented Visual Feedback on Balance Control in Unilateral Transfemoral Amputees
title_fullStr Influence of Augmented Visual Feedback on Balance Control in Unilateral Transfemoral Amputees
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Augmented Visual Feedback on Balance Control in Unilateral Transfemoral Amputees
title_short Influence of Augmented Visual Feedback on Balance Control in Unilateral Transfemoral Amputees
title_sort influence of augmented visual feedback on balance control in unilateral transfemoral amputees
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8473899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34588950
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.727527
work_keys_str_mv AT fuchskatharina influenceofaugmentedvisualfeedbackonbalancecontrolinunilateraltransfemoralamputees
AT krauskopfthomas influenceofaugmentedvisualfeedbackonbalancecontrolinunilateraltransfemoralamputees
AT laucktorbenb influenceofaugmentedvisualfeedbackonbalancecontrolinunilateraltransfemoralamputees
AT kleinlukas influenceofaugmentedvisualfeedbackonbalancecontrolinunilateraltransfemoralamputees
AT muellermarc influenceofaugmentedvisualfeedbackonbalancecontrolinunilateraltransfemoralamputees
AT hergetgeorgw influenceofaugmentedvisualfeedbackonbalancecontrolinunilateraltransfemoralamputees
AT vontscharnervinzenz influenceofaugmentedvisualfeedbackonbalancecontrolinunilateraltransfemoralamputees
AT stutzignorman influenceofaugmentedvisualfeedbackonbalancecontrolinunilateraltransfemoralamputees
AT stieglitzthomas influenceofaugmentedvisualfeedbackonbalancecontrolinunilateraltransfemoralamputees
AT pasluostacristian influenceofaugmentedvisualfeedbackonbalancecontrolinunilateraltransfemoralamputees