Cargando…

Clinical Practice and Barriers of Ventilatory Support Management in COVID-19 Patients in Saudi Arabia: A Survey of Respiratory Therapists

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to determine the clinical practice and barriers of ventilatory support management in COVID-19 patients in Saudi Arabia among respiratory therapists. METHODS: A validated questionnaire comprising three parts was distributed to all critical care respiratory therapis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alqahtani, Jaber S., Aldabayan, Yousef S., AlAhmari, Mohammed D., AlRabeeah, Saad M., Aldhahir, Abdulelah M., Alghamdi, Saeed M., Oyelade, Tope, Althobiani, Malik, Alrajeh, Ahmed M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8473999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34667468
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_58_21
_version_ 1784575123472252928
author Alqahtani, Jaber S.
Aldabayan, Yousef S.
AlAhmari, Mohammed D.
AlRabeeah, Saad M.
Aldhahir, Abdulelah M.
Alghamdi, Saeed M.
Oyelade, Tope
Althobiani, Malik
Alrajeh, Ahmed M.
author_facet Alqahtani, Jaber S.
Aldabayan, Yousef S.
AlAhmari, Mohammed D.
AlRabeeah, Saad M.
Aldhahir, Abdulelah M.
Alghamdi, Saeed M.
Oyelade, Tope
Althobiani, Malik
Alrajeh, Ahmed M.
author_sort Alqahtani, Jaber S.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to determine the clinical practice and barriers of ventilatory support management in COVID-19 patients in Saudi Arabia among respiratory therapists. METHODS: A validated questionnaire comprising three parts was distributed to all critical care respiratory therapists registered with the Saudi Society for Respiratory Care through the official social networks. RESULTS: A total of 74 respiratory therapists completed the survey. The mean (±standard deviation) of intensive care unit beds was 67 ± 79. Clinical presentation (54%) and arterial blood gas (38%) were the two main diagnostic tools used to initiate ventilatory support. While protocols for the initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV; 81%) were widely available, participants had limited availability of protocols for the use of non-invasive ventilation (NIV; 34%) and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC; 34%). In mild cases of COVID-19, most respondents used HFNC (57%), while IMV was mostly used in moderate (43%) and severe (93%) cases. Regular ventilator check was mostly done every 4 h (57%). BiPAP (47.3%) and full-face masks (45.9%) were the most used mode and interface, respectively, while pressure-regulated volume control (55.4%) and pressure control (27%) were the most used mechanical ventilation modes for COVID-19 patients. In terms of use of proning, 62% used it on IMV, while 26% reported using awake proning. Staff shortage (51.4%), personal protective equipment (PPE) shortage (51.4%), increased workload (45.9%), inadequate training (43.2%) and lack of available protocols and policies (37.8%) were the main barriers. CONCLUSION: Ventilatory support management of COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia was inconsistent with the global practice, lacked uniformity, and there was limited use of standard protocols/treatment guidelines. Shortage of staff and PPE, increased workload and insufficient training were the most prevalent barriers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8473999
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84739992021-10-18 Clinical Practice and Barriers of Ventilatory Support Management in COVID-19 Patients in Saudi Arabia: A Survey of Respiratory Therapists Alqahtani, Jaber S. Aldabayan, Yousef S. AlAhmari, Mohammed D. AlRabeeah, Saad M. Aldhahir, Abdulelah M. Alghamdi, Saeed M. Oyelade, Tope Althobiani, Malik Alrajeh, Ahmed M. Saudi J Med Med Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to determine the clinical practice and barriers of ventilatory support management in COVID-19 patients in Saudi Arabia among respiratory therapists. METHODS: A validated questionnaire comprising three parts was distributed to all critical care respiratory therapists registered with the Saudi Society for Respiratory Care through the official social networks. RESULTS: A total of 74 respiratory therapists completed the survey. The mean (±standard deviation) of intensive care unit beds was 67 ± 79. Clinical presentation (54%) and arterial blood gas (38%) were the two main diagnostic tools used to initiate ventilatory support. While protocols for the initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV; 81%) were widely available, participants had limited availability of protocols for the use of non-invasive ventilation (NIV; 34%) and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC; 34%). In mild cases of COVID-19, most respondents used HFNC (57%), while IMV was mostly used in moderate (43%) and severe (93%) cases. Regular ventilator check was mostly done every 4 h (57%). BiPAP (47.3%) and full-face masks (45.9%) were the most used mode and interface, respectively, while pressure-regulated volume control (55.4%) and pressure control (27%) were the most used mechanical ventilation modes for COVID-19 patients. In terms of use of proning, 62% used it on IMV, while 26% reported using awake proning. Staff shortage (51.4%), personal protective equipment (PPE) shortage (51.4%), increased workload (45.9%), inadequate training (43.2%) and lack of available protocols and policies (37.8%) were the main barriers. CONCLUSION: Ventilatory support management of COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia was inconsistent with the global practice, lacked uniformity, and there was limited use of standard protocols/treatment guidelines. Shortage of staff and PPE, increased workload and insufficient training were the most prevalent barriers. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8473999/ /pubmed/34667468 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_58_21 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Alqahtani, Jaber S.
Aldabayan, Yousef S.
AlAhmari, Mohammed D.
AlRabeeah, Saad M.
Aldhahir, Abdulelah M.
Alghamdi, Saeed M.
Oyelade, Tope
Althobiani, Malik
Alrajeh, Ahmed M.
Clinical Practice and Barriers of Ventilatory Support Management in COVID-19 Patients in Saudi Arabia: A Survey of Respiratory Therapists
title Clinical Practice and Barriers of Ventilatory Support Management in COVID-19 Patients in Saudi Arabia: A Survey of Respiratory Therapists
title_full Clinical Practice and Barriers of Ventilatory Support Management in COVID-19 Patients in Saudi Arabia: A Survey of Respiratory Therapists
title_fullStr Clinical Practice and Barriers of Ventilatory Support Management in COVID-19 Patients in Saudi Arabia: A Survey of Respiratory Therapists
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Practice and Barriers of Ventilatory Support Management in COVID-19 Patients in Saudi Arabia: A Survey of Respiratory Therapists
title_short Clinical Practice and Barriers of Ventilatory Support Management in COVID-19 Patients in Saudi Arabia: A Survey of Respiratory Therapists
title_sort clinical practice and barriers of ventilatory support management in covid-19 patients in saudi arabia: a survey of respiratory therapists
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8473999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34667468
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_58_21
work_keys_str_mv AT alqahtanijabers clinicalpracticeandbarriersofventilatorysupportmanagementincovid19patientsinsaudiarabiaasurveyofrespiratorytherapists
AT aldabayanyousefs clinicalpracticeandbarriersofventilatorysupportmanagementincovid19patientsinsaudiarabiaasurveyofrespiratorytherapists
AT alahmarimohammedd clinicalpracticeandbarriersofventilatorysupportmanagementincovid19patientsinsaudiarabiaasurveyofrespiratorytherapists
AT alrabeeahsaadm clinicalpracticeandbarriersofventilatorysupportmanagementincovid19patientsinsaudiarabiaasurveyofrespiratorytherapists
AT aldhahirabdulelahm clinicalpracticeandbarriersofventilatorysupportmanagementincovid19patientsinsaudiarabiaasurveyofrespiratorytherapists
AT alghamdisaeedm clinicalpracticeandbarriersofventilatorysupportmanagementincovid19patientsinsaudiarabiaasurveyofrespiratorytherapists
AT oyeladetope clinicalpracticeandbarriersofventilatorysupportmanagementincovid19patientsinsaudiarabiaasurveyofrespiratorytherapists
AT althobianimalik clinicalpracticeandbarriersofventilatorysupportmanagementincovid19patientsinsaudiarabiaasurveyofrespiratorytherapists
AT alrajehahmedm clinicalpracticeandbarriersofventilatorysupportmanagementincovid19patientsinsaudiarabiaasurveyofrespiratorytherapists