Cargando…
Survival Impact of an Enhanced Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Conference in a Regional Community Health Care System
INTRODUCTION: We compared NSCLC treatment and survival within and outside a multidisciplinary model of care from a large community health care system. METHODS: We implemented a rigorously benchmarked “enhanced” Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Conference (eMTOC) and used Tumor Registry data (2011...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8474211/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34590046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtocrr.2021.100203 |
_version_ | 1784575162767638528 |
---|---|
author | Ray, Meredith A. Faris, Nicholas R. Fehnel, Carrie Derrick, Anna Smeltzer, Matthew P. Meadows-Taylor, Meghan B. Ariganjoye, Folabi Pacheco, Alicia Optican, Robert Tonkin, Keith Wright, Jeffrey Fox, Roy Callahan, Thomas Robbins, Edward T. Walsh, William Lammers, Philip Satpute, Shailesh Osarogiagbon, Raymond U. |
author_facet | Ray, Meredith A. Faris, Nicholas R. Fehnel, Carrie Derrick, Anna Smeltzer, Matthew P. Meadows-Taylor, Meghan B. Ariganjoye, Folabi Pacheco, Alicia Optican, Robert Tonkin, Keith Wright, Jeffrey Fox, Roy Callahan, Thomas Robbins, Edward T. Walsh, William Lammers, Philip Satpute, Shailesh Osarogiagbon, Raymond U. |
author_sort | Ray, Meredith A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: We compared NSCLC treatment and survival within and outside a multidisciplinary model of care from a large community health care system. METHODS: We implemented a rigorously benchmarked “enhanced” Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Conference (eMTOC) and used Tumor Registry data (2011–2017) to evaluate guideline-concordant care. Because eMTOC was located in metropolitan Memphis, we separated non-MTOC patient by metropolitan and regional location. We categorized National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline-concordant treatment as “preferred,” or “appropriate” (allowable under certain circumstances). We compared demographic and clinical characteristics across cohorts using chi-square tests and survival using Cox regression, adjusted for multiple testing. We also performed propensity-matched and adjusted survival analyses. RESULTS: Of 6259 patients, 14% were in eMTOC, 55% metropolitan non-MTOC, and 31% regional non-MTOC cohorts. eMTOC had the highest rates of African Americans (34% versus 28% versus 22%), stages I to IIIB (63 versus 40 versus 50), urban residents (81 versus 78 versus 20), stage-preferred treatment (66 versus 57 versus 48), guideline-concordant treatment (78 versus 70 versus 63), and lowest percentage of nontreatment (6 versus 21 versus 28); all p values were less than 0.001. Compared with eMTOC, hazard for death was higher in metropolitan (1.5, 95% confidence interval: 1.4–1.7) and regional (1.7, 1.5–1.9) non-MTOC; hazards were higher in regional non-MTOC versus metropolitan (1.1, 1.0–1.2); all p values were less than 0.05 after adjustment. Results were generally similar after propensity analysis with and without adjusting for guideline-concordant treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary NSCLC care planning was associated with significantly higher rates of guideline-concordant care and survival, providing evidence for rigorous implementation of this model of care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8474211 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84742112021-09-28 Survival Impact of an Enhanced Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Conference in a Regional Community Health Care System Ray, Meredith A. Faris, Nicholas R. Fehnel, Carrie Derrick, Anna Smeltzer, Matthew P. Meadows-Taylor, Meghan B. Ariganjoye, Folabi Pacheco, Alicia Optican, Robert Tonkin, Keith Wright, Jeffrey Fox, Roy Callahan, Thomas Robbins, Edward T. Walsh, William Lammers, Philip Satpute, Shailesh Osarogiagbon, Raymond U. JTO Clin Res Rep Original Article INTRODUCTION: We compared NSCLC treatment and survival within and outside a multidisciplinary model of care from a large community health care system. METHODS: We implemented a rigorously benchmarked “enhanced” Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Conference (eMTOC) and used Tumor Registry data (2011–2017) to evaluate guideline-concordant care. Because eMTOC was located in metropolitan Memphis, we separated non-MTOC patient by metropolitan and regional location. We categorized National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline-concordant treatment as “preferred,” or “appropriate” (allowable under certain circumstances). We compared demographic and clinical characteristics across cohorts using chi-square tests and survival using Cox regression, adjusted for multiple testing. We also performed propensity-matched and adjusted survival analyses. RESULTS: Of 6259 patients, 14% were in eMTOC, 55% metropolitan non-MTOC, and 31% regional non-MTOC cohorts. eMTOC had the highest rates of African Americans (34% versus 28% versus 22%), stages I to IIIB (63 versus 40 versus 50), urban residents (81 versus 78 versus 20), stage-preferred treatment (66 versus 57 versus 48), guideline-concordant treatment (78 versus 70 versus 63), and lowest percentage of nontreatment (6 versus 21 versus 28); all p values were less than 0.001. Compared with eMTOC, hazard for death was higher in metropolitan (1.5, 95% confidence interval: 1.4–1.7) and regional (1.7, 1.5–1.9) non-MTOC; hazards were higher in regional non-MTOC versus metropolitan (1.1, 1.0–1.2); all p values were less than 0.05 after adjustment. Results were generally similar after propensity analysis with and without adjusting for guideline-concordant treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary NSCLC care planning was associated with significantly higher rates of guideline-concordant care and survival, providing evidence for rigorous implementation of this model of care. Elsevier 2021-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8474211/ /pubmed/34590046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtocrr.2021.100203 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ray, Meredith A. Faris, Nicholas R. Fehnel, Carrie Derrick, Anna Smeltzer, Matthew P. Meadows-Taylor, Meghan B. Ariganjoye, Folabi Pacheco, Alicia Optican, Robert Tonkin, Keith Wright, Jeffrey Fox, Roy Callahan, Thomas Robbins, Edward T. Walsh, William Lammers, Philip Satpute, Shailesh Osarogiagbon, Raymond U. Survival Impact of an Enhanced Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Conference in a Regional Community Health Care System |
title | Survival Impact of an Enhanced Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Conference in a Regional Community Health Care System |
title_full | Survival Impact of an Enhanced Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Conference in a Regional Community Health Care System |
title_fullStr | Survival Impact of an Enhanced Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Conference in a Regional Community Health Care System |
title_full_unstemmed | Survival Impact of an Enhanced Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Conference in a Regional Community Health Care System |
title_short | Survival Impact of an Enhanced Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Conference in a Regional Community Health Care System |
title_sort | survival impact of an enhanced multidisciplinary thoracic oncology conference in a regional community health care system |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8474211/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34590046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtocrr.2021.100203 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT raymereditha survivalimpactofanenhancedmultidisciplinarythoraciconcologyconferenceinaregionalcommunityhealthcaresystem AT farisnicholasr survivalimpactofanenhancedmultidisciplinarythoraciconcologyconferenceinaregionalcommunityhealthcaresystem AT fehnelcarrie survivalimpactofanenhancedmultidisciplinarythoraciconcologyconferenceinaregionalcommunityhealthcaresystem AT derrickanna survivalimpactofanenhancedmultidisciplinarythoraciconcologyconferenceinaregionalcommunityhealthcaresystem AT smeltzermatthewp survivalimpactofanenhancedmultidisciplinarythoraciconcologyconferenceinaregionalcommunityhealthcaresystem AT meadowstaylormeghanb survivalimpactofanenhancedmultidisciplinarythoraciconcologyconferenceinaregionalcommunityhealthcaresystem AT ariganjoyefolabi survivalimpactofanenhancedmultidisciplinarythoraciconcologyconferenceinaregionalcommunityhealthcaresystem AT pachecoalicia survivalimpactofanenhancedmultidisciplinarythoraciconcologyconferenceinaregionalcommunityhealthcaresystem AT opticanrobert survivalimpactofanenhancedmultidisciplinarythoraciconcologyconferenceinaregionalcommunityhealthcaresystem AT tonkinkeith survivalimpactofanenhancedmultidisciplinarythoraciconcologyconferenceinaregionalcommunityhealthcaresystem AT wrightjeffrey survivalimpactofanenhancedmultidisciplinarythoraciconcologyconferenceinaregionalcommunityhealthcaresystem AT foxroy survivalimpactofanenhancedmultidisciplinarythoraciconcologyconferenceinaregionalcommunityhealthcaresystem AT callahanthomas survivalimpactofanenhancedmultidisciplinarythoraciconcologyconferenceinaregionalcommunityhealthcaresystem AT robbinsedwardt survivalimpactofanenhancedmultidisciplinarythoraciconcologyconferenceinaregionalcommunityhealthcaresystem AT walshwilliam survivalimpactofanenhancedmultidisciplinarythoraciconcologyconferenceinaregionalcommunityhealthcaresystem AT lammersphilip survivalimpactofanenhancedmultidisciplinarythoraciconcologyconferenceinaregionalcommunityhealthcaresystem AT satputeshailesh survivalimpactofanenhancedmultidisciplinarythoraciconcologyconferenceinaregionalcommunityhealthcaresystem AT osarogiagbonraymondu survivalimpactofanenhancedmultidisciplinarythoraciconcologyconferenceinaregionalcommunityhealthcaresystem |