Cargando…

Development and Validation of a Simplified Prognostic Score in SCLC

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed at generating a new simplified prognostic score (SPS) using common clinical and biological variables to discriminate a limited number of subgroups of patients with SCLC differing by their overall survival (OS). METHODS: The SPS was developed exploring the Montpellier U...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Negre, Elodie, Coffy, Amandine, Langlais, Alexandra, Daures, Jean-Pierre, Lavole, Armelle, Quoix, Elisabeth, Molinier, Olivier, Greillier, Laurent, Audigier-Valette, Clarisse, Moro-Sibilot, Denis, Westeel, Virginie, Morin, Franck, Roch, Benoît, Pujol, Jean-Louis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8474253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34589918
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtocrr.2020.100016
_version_ 1784575171676340224
author Negre, Elodie
Coffy, Amandine
Langlais, Alexandra
Daures, Jean-Pierre
Lavole, Armelle
Quoix, Elisabeth
Molinier, Olivier
Greillier, Laurent
Audigier-Valette, Clarisse
Moro-Sibilot, Denis
Westeel, Virginie
Morin, Franck
Roch, Benoît
Pujol, Jean-Louis
author_facet Negre, Elodie
Coffy, Amandine
Langlais, Alexandra
Daures, Jean-Pierre
Lavole, Armelle
Quoix, Elisabeth
Molinier, Olivier
Greillier, Laurent
Audigier-Valette, Clarisse
Moro-Sibilot, Denis
Westeel, Virginie
Morin, Franck
Roch, Benoît
Pujol, Jean-Louis
author_sort Negre, Elodie
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This study aimed at generating a new simplified prognostic score (SPS) using common clinical and biological variables to discriminate a limited number of subgroups of patients with SCLC differing by their overall survival (OS). METHODS: The SPS was developed exploring the Montpellier University Hospital retrospective database of 401 patients over a 16-year period. All patients had received etoposide - platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment. The SPS development took into account significant determinants of OS in the Cox model, weighted by their regression β coefficients. Validation of the consequent SPS has been done separately in a combined population of 213 patients accrued from two different published trials (NCT03059667 and NCT00930891). RESULTS: The significant independent determinants of OS included the following: (1) American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM stage IV (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.52; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.91–3.33); (2) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status greater than 1 (HR: 2.27; 95% CI: 1.79–2.87); (3) the presence of liver metastases (HR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.29–2.15); and (4) neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio greater than 4 (HR: 1.39; 95% CI: 1.11–1.92). The SPS generated with these four variables, segregated three groups (good, intermediate, and poor prognosis) with respective median OS of 26.9 months (95% CI: 20.1–38.9), 11.5 months (95% CI: 9.8–13.0), and 6.8 months (95% CI: 5.8–8.3; log-rank p < 10(–4)). Harrell's C statistic estimate was 0.68 ± 0.012, suggesting goodness of calibration. In the validation cohort, the SPS segregated the aforementioned three subgroups in a nearly similar manner, with respective median OS: 27.2, 12.3, and 8.6 months (log-rank p < 10(–3); Harrell’s C statistic: 0.58 ± 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The SPS is easy to calculate in real-life practice and efficiently discriminates three populations with different prognoses. This study deserves further validation of this score in patients with SCLC receiving immunochemotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8474253
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84742532021-09-28 Development and Validation of a Simplified Prognostic Score in SCLC Negre, Elodie Coffy, Amandine Langlais, Alexandra Daures, Jean-Pierre Lavole, Armelle Quoix, Elisabeth Molinier, Olivier Greillier, Laurent Audigier-Valette, Clarisse Moro-Sibilot, Denis Westeel, Virginie Morin, Franck Roch, Benoît Pujol, Jean-Louis JTO Clin Res Rep Original Article INTRODUCTION: This study aimed at generating a new simplified prognostic score (SPS) using common clinical and biological variables to discriminate a limited number of subgroups of patients with SCLC differing by their overall survival (OS). METHODS: The SPS was developed exploring the Montpellier University Hospital retrospective database of 401 patients over a 16-year period. All patients had received etoposide - platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment. The SPS development took into account significant determinants of OS in the Cox model, weighted by their regression β coefficients. Validation of the consequent SPS has been done separately in a combined population of 213 patients accrued from two different published trials (NCT03059667 and NCT00930891). RESULTS: The significant independent determinants of OS included the following: (1) American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM stage IV (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.52; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.91–3.33); (2) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status greater than 1 (HR: 2.27; 95% CI: 1.79–2.87); (3) the presence of liver metastases (HR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.29–2.15); and (4) neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio greater than 4 (HR: 1.39; 95% CI: 1.11–1.92). The SPS generated with these four variables, segregated three groups (good, intermediate, and poor prognosis) with respective median OS of 26.9 months (95% CI: 20.1–38.9), 11.5 months (95% CI: 9.8–13.0), and 6.8 months (95% CI: 5.8–8.3; log-rank p < 10(–4)). Harrell's C statistic estimate was 0.68 ± 0.012, suggesting goodness of calibration. In the validation cohort, the SPS segregated the aforementioned three subgroups in a nearly similar manner, with respective median OS: 27.2, 12.3, and 8.6 months (log-rank p < 10(–3); Harrell’s C statistic: 0.58 ± 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The SPS is easy to calculate in real-life practice and efficiently discriminates three populations with different prognoses. This study deserves further validation of this score in patients with SCLC receiving immunochemotherapy. Elsevier 2020-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8474253/ /pubmed/34589918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtocrr.2020.100016 Text en © 2020 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Negre, Elodie
Coffy, Amandine
Langlais, Alexandra
Daures, Jean-Pierre
Lavole, Armelle
Quoix, Elisabeth
Molinier, Olivier
Greillier, Laurent
Audigier-Valette, Clarisse
Moro-Sibilot, Denis
Westeel, Virginie
Morin, Franck
Roch, Benoît
Pujol, Jean-Louis
Development and Validation of a Simplified Prognostic Score in SCLC
title Development and Validation of a Simplified Prognostic Score in SCLC
title_full Development and Validation of a Simplified Prognostic Score in SCLC
title_fullStr Development and Validation of a Simplified Prognostic Score in SCLC
title_full_unstemmed Development and Validation of a Simplified Prognostic Score in SCLC
title_short Development and Validation of a Simplified Prognostic Score in SCLC
title_sort development and validation of a simplified prognostic score in sclc
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8474253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34589918
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtocrr.2020.100016
work_keys_str_mv AT negreelodie developmentandvalidationofasimplifiedprognosticscoreinsclc
AT coffyamandine developmentandvalidationofasimplifiedprognosticscoreinsclc
AT langlaisalexandra developmentandvalidationofasimplifiedprognosticscoreinsclc
AT dauresjeanpierre developmentandvalidationofasimplifiedprognosticscoreinsclc
AT lavolearmelle developmentandvalidationofasimplifiedprognosticscoreinsclc
AT quoixelisabeth developmentandvalidationofasimplifiedprognosticscoreinsclc
AT molinierolivier developmentandvalidationofasimplifiedprognosticscoreinsclc
AT greillierlaurent developmentandvalidationofasimplifiedprognosticscoreinsclc
AT audigiervaletteclarisse developmentandvalidationofasimplifiedprognosticscoreinsclc
AT morosibilotdenis developmentandvalidationofasimplifiedprognosticscoreinsclc
AT westeelvirginie developmentandvalidationofasimplifiedprognosticscoreinsclc
AT morinfranck developmentandvalidationofasimplifiedprognosticscoreinsclc
AT rochbenoit developmentandvalidationofasimplifiedprognosticscoreinsclc
AT pujoljeanlouis developmentandvalidationofasimplifiedprognosticscoreinsclc