Cargando…

Differential effects of donor lymphocyte infusion upon treatment response and GVHD according to relapse level and donor sources in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome

INTRODUCTION: Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) is one of the effective options for post-transplant disease control of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Its success or failure depends on the induction of antitumor immune reactions, durability of clinical responses, and severity of unwanted toxicities ma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Silvia, Kim, Tong Yoon, Lee, Jong Hyuk, Lee, Joon yeop, Min, Gi June, Park, Sung Soo, Yahng, Seung-Ah, Shin, Seung-Hwan, Yoon, Jae-Ho, Lee, Sung-Eun, Cho, Byung Sik, Eom, Ki-Seong, Lee, Seok, Kim, Hee-Je, Min, Chang-Ki, Lee, Jong Wook, Kim, Yoo-Jin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8474341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34589195
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20406207211043748
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) is one of the effective options for post-transplant disease control of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Its success or failure depends on the induction of antitumor immune reactions, durability of clinical responses, and severity of unwanted toxicities mainly from graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). METHODS: By analyzing 61 patients receiving DLI for post-transplant MDS relapse, we assessed treatment outcomes and affecting factors, especially focusing on the level of relapse (hematological, molecular, and imminent relapse). RESULTS: The response rate (42.1%, 36.4%, 72.7%), and overall survival (OS) at 2 years (27.8%, 45.5%, 70.1%) were different for each relapse level with imminent relapse group showing the most promising results. For OS, response to DLI or pre-DLI chemotherapy, and time to relapse were independent prognostic factors. Meanwhile, post-DLI GVHD and time to relapse were independently predictive for DLI response; post-DLI GVHD was predictive for DLI response, but not for OS, suggesting a potential detrimental impact of GVHD on survival. The incidence of GVHD and GVHD-related deaths were 37.7% and 10.0%, respectively, and CD3(+) cell doses triggering GVHD tended to be lower in cases with haploidentical donor or imminent relapse. CONCLUSION: Despite being limited by small number of cases and its retrospective nature, this study again demonstrated the therapeutic effects of DLI in relapsed MDS, and that earlier detection and intervention at lower level relapse might possibly be associated with better results. Furthermore, we propose that tailored cell dosing schedule based on relapse level and donor source may be helpful in minimizing fatal GVHD.