Cargando…

Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma, a randomized controlled trial (ROBOT-2 trial)

BACKGROUND: For patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma or cancer of the gastroesophageal junction, radical esophagectomy with 2-field lymphadenectomy is the cornerstone of the multimodality treatment with curative intent. Both conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) and robot assisted m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tagkalos, E., van der Sluis, P. C., Berlth, F., Poplawski, A., Hadzijusufovic, E., Lang, H., van Berge Henegouwen, M. I., Gisbertz, S. S., Müller-Stich, B. P., Ruurda, J. P., Schiesser, M., Schneider, P. M., van Hillegersberg, R., Grimminger, P. P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8474742/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34565343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08780-x
_version_ 1784575285856829440
author Tagkalos, E.
van der Sluis, P. C.
Berlth, F.
Poplawski, A.
Hadzijusufovic, E.
Lang, H.
van Berge Henegouwen, M. I.
Gisbertz, S. S.
Müller-Stich, B. P.
Ruurda, J. P.
Schiesser, M.
Schneider, P. M.
van Hillegersberg, R.
Grimminger, P. P.
author_facet Tagkalos, E.
van der Sluis, P. C.
Berlth, F.
Poplawski, A.
Hadzijusufovic, E.
Lang, H.
van Berge Henegouwen, M. I.
Gisbertz, S. S.
Müller-Stich, B. P.
Ruurda, J. P.
Schiesser, M.
Schneider, P. M.
van Hillegersberg, R.
Grimminger, P. P.
author_sort Tagkalos, E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: For patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma or cancer of the gastroesophageal junction, radical esophagectomy with 2-field lymphadenectomy is the cornerstone of the multimodality treatment with curative intent. Both conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) and robot assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) were shown to be superior compared to open transthoracic esophagectomy considering postoperative complications. However, no randomized comparison exists between MIE and RAMIE in the Western World for patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: This is an investigator-initiated and investigator-driven multicenter randomized controlled parallel-group superiority trial. All adult patients (age ≥ 18 and ≤ 90 years) with histologically proven, surgically resectable (cT1-4a, N0–3, M0) esophageal adenocarcinoma of the intrathoracic esophagus or adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction and with European Clinical Oncology Group performance status 0, 1 or 2 will be assessed for eligibility and included after obtaining informed consent. Patients (n = 218) with resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma of the intrathoracic esophagus or adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction are randomized to either RAMIE (n = 109) or MIE (n = 109). The primary outcome of this study is the total number of resected abdominal and mediastinal lymph nodes specified per lymph node station. CONCLUSION: This is the first randomized controlled trial designed to compare RAMIE to MIE as surgical treatment for resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction in the Western World. The hypothesis of the proposed study is that RAMIE will result in a higher abdominal and mediastinal lymph node yield specified per station compared to conventional MIE. Short-term results and the primary endpoint (total number of resected abdominal and mediastinal lymph nodes per lymph node station) will be analyzed and published after discharge of the last randomized patient within this trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04306458. Registered 13th March 2020, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04306458; Date of first enrolment 18.01.2021; Target sample size 218; Recruitment status: Recruiting; Protocol version 2; Issue date 10.03.2020; Rev. 02.02.2021; Authors ET, PCvdS, PPG.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8474742
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84747422021-09-28 Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma, a randomized controlled trial (ROBOT-2 trial) Tagkalos, E. van der Sluis, P. C. Berlth, F. Poplawski, A. Hadzijusufovic, E. Lang, H. van Berge Henegouwen, M. I. Gisbertz, S. S. Müller-Stich, B. P. Ruurda, J. P. Schiesser, M. Schneider, P. M. van Hillegersberg, R. Grimminger, P. P. BMC Cancer Study Protocol BACKGROUND: For patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma or cancer of the gastroesophageal junction, radical esophagectomy with 2-field lymphadenectomy is the cornerstone of the multimodality treatment with curative intent. Both conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) and robot assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) were shown to be superior compared to open transthoracic esophagectomy considering postoperative complications. However, no randomized comparison exists between MIE and RAMIE in the Western World for patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: This is an investigator-initiated and investigator-driven multicenter randomized controlled parallel-group superiority trial. All adult patients (age ≥ 18 and ≤ 90 years) with histologically proven, surgically resectable (cT1-4a, N0–3, M0) esophageal adenocarcinoma of the intrathoracic esophagus or adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction and with European Clinical Oncology Group performance status 0, 1 or 2 will be assessed for eligibility and included after obtaining informed consent. Patients (n = 218) with resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma of the intrathoracic esophagus or adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction are randomized to either RAMIE (n = 109) or MIE (n = 109). The primary outcome of this study is the total number of resected abdominal and mediastinal lymph nodes specified per lymph node station. CONCLUSION: This is the first randomized controlled trial designed to compare RAMIE to MIE as surgical treatment for resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction in the Western World. The hypothesis of the proposed study is that RAMIE will result in a higher abdominal and mediastinal lymph node yield specified per station compared to conventional MIE. Short-term results and the primary endpoint (total number of resected abdominal and mediastinal lymph nodes per lymph node station) will be analyzed and published after discharge of the last randomized patient within this trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04306458. Registered 13th March 2020, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04306458; Date of first enrolment 18.01.2021; Target sample size 218; Recruitment status: Recruiting; Protocol version 2; Issue date 10.03.2020; Rev. 02.02.2021; Authors ET, PCvdS, PPG. BioMed Central 2021-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8474742/ /pubmed/34565343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08780-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Tagkalos, E.
van der Sluis, P. C.
Berlth, F.
Poplawski, A.
Hadzijusufovic, E.
Lang, H.
van Berge Henegouwen, M. I.
Gisbertz, S. S.
Müller-Stich, B. P.
Ruurda, J. P.
Schiesser, M.
Schneider, P. M.
van Hillegersberg, R.
Grimminger, P. P.
Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma, a randomized controlled trial (ROBOT-2 trial)
title Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma, a randomized controlled trial (ROBOT-2 trial)
title_full Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma, a randomized controlled trial (ROBOT-2 trial)
title_fullStr Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma, a randomized controlled trial (ROBOT-2 trial)
title_full_unstemmed Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma, a randomized controlled trial (ROBOT-2 trial)
title_short Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma, a randomized controlled trial (ROBOT-2 trial)
title_sort robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma, a randomized controlled trial (robot-2 trial)
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8474742/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34565343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08780-x
work_keys_str_mv AT tagkalose robotassistedminimallyinvasivethoracolaparoscopicesophagectomyversusminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyforresectableesophagealadenocarcinomaarandomizedcontrolledtrialrobot2trial
AT vandersluispc robotassistedminimallyinvasivethoracolaparoscopicesophagectomyversusminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyforresectableesophagealadenocarcinomaarandomizedcontrolledtrialrobot2trial
AT berlthf robotassistedminimallyinvasivethoracolaparoscopicesophagectomyversusminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyforresectableesophagealadenocarcinomaarandomizedcontrolledtrialrobot2trial
AT poplawskia robotassistedminimallyinvasivethoracolaparoscopicesophagectomyversusminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyforresectableesophagealadenocarcinomaarandomizedcontrolledtrialrobot2trial
AT hadzijusufovice robotassistedminimallyinvasivethoracolaparoscopicesophagectomyversusminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyforresectableesophagealadenocarcinomaarandomizedcontrolledtrialrobot2trial
AT langh robotassistedminimallyinvasivethoracolaparoscopicesophagectomyversusminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyforresectableesophagealadenocarcinomaarandomizedcontrolledtrialrobot2trial
AT vanbergehenegouwenmi robotassistedminimallyinvasivethoracolaparoscopicesophagectomyversusminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyforresectableesophagealadenocarcinomaarandomizedcontrolledtrialrobot2trial
AT gisbertzss robotassistedminimallyinvasivethoracolaparoscopicesophagectomyversusminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyforresectableesophagealadenocarcinomaarandomizedcontrolledtrialrobot2trial
AT mullerstichbp robotassistedminimallyinvasivethoracolaparoscopicesophagectomyversusminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyforresectableesophagealadenocarcinomaarandomizedcontrolledtrialrobot2trial
AT ruurdajp robotassistedminimallyinvasivethoracolaparoscopicesophagectomyversusminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyforresectableesophagealadenocarcinomaarandomizedcontrolledtrialrobot2trial
AT schiesserm robotassistedminimallyinvasivethoracolaparoscopicesophagectomyversusminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyforresectableesophagealadenocarcinomaarandomizedcontrolledtrialrobot2trial
AT schneiderpm robotassistedminimallyinvasivethoracolaparoscopicesophagectomyversusminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyforresectableesophagealadenocarcinomaarandomizedcontrolledtrialrobot2trial
AT vanhillegersbergr robotassistedminimallyinvasivethoracolaparoscopicesophagectomyversusminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyforresectableesophagealadenocarcinomaarandomizedcontrolledtrialrobot2trial
AT grimmingerpp robotassistedminimallyinvasivethoracolaparoscopicesophagectomyversusminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyforresectableesophagealadenocarcinomaarandomizedcontrolledtrialrobot2trial