Cargando…
Intrafractional stability of MR-guided online adaptive SBRT for prostate cancer
BACKGROUND: MR-guided online adaptive stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer aims to reduce toxicity by full compensation of interfractional uncertainties. However, the process of online adaptation currently takes approximately 45 min during which intrafractional movements re...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8474766/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34565439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01916-0 |
_version_ | 1784575291946958848 |
---|---|
author | Schaule, J. Chamberlain, M. Wilke, L. Baumgartl, M. Krayenbühl, J. Zamburlini, M. Mayinger, M. Andratschke, N. Tanadini-Lang, S. Guckenberger, M. |
author_facet | Schaule, J. Chamberlain, M. Wilke, L. Baumgartl, M. Krayenbühl, J. Zamburlini, M. Mayinger, M. Andratschke, N. Tanadini-Lang, S. Guckenberger, M. |
author_sort | Schaule, J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: MR-guided online adaptive stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer aims to reduce toxicity by full compensation of interfractional uncertainties. However, the process of online adaptation currently takes approximately 45 min during which intrafractional movements remain unaccounted for. This study aims to analyze the dosimetric benefit of online adaptation and to evaluate its robustness over the duration of one treatment fraction. METHODS: Baseline MR-scans at a MR-linear accelerator were acquired for ten healthy male volunteers for generation of mock-prostate SBRT plans with a dose prescription of 5 × 7.25 Gy. On a separate day, online MR-guided adaptation (ViewRay(®) MRIdian) was performed, and thereafter MR images were acquired every 15 min for 1 h to assess the stability of the adapted plan. RESULTS: A dosimetric benefit of online MR-guided adaptive re-planning was observed in 90% of volunteers. The median D(95)CTV- and D(95)PTV-coverage was improved from 34.8 to 35.5 Gy and from 30.7 to 34.6 Gy, respectively. Improved target coverage was not associated with higher dose to the organs at risk, most importantly the rectum (median D(1cc)rectum baseline plan vs. adapted plan 33.3 Gy vs. 32.3 Gy). The benefit of online adaptation remained stable over 45 min for all volunteers. However, at 60 min, CTV-coverage was below a threshold of 32.5 Gy in 30% of volunteers (30.6 Gy, 32.0 Gy, 32.3 Gy). CONCLUSION: The dosimetric benefit of MR-guided online adaptation for prostate SBRT was robust over 45 min in all volunteers. However, intrafractional uncertainties became dosimetrically relevant at 60 min and we therefore recommend verification imaging before delivery of MR-guided online adapted SBRT. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-021-01916-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8474766 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84747662021-09-28 Intrafractional stability of MR-guided online adaptive SBRT for prostate cancer Schaule, J. Chamberlain, M. Wilke, L. Baumgartl, M. Krayenbühl, J. Zamburlini, M. Mayinger, M. Andratschke, N. Tanadini-Lang, S. Guckenberger, M. Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: MR-guided online adaptive stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer aims to reduce toxicity by full compensation of interfractional uncertainties. However, the process of online adaptation currently takes approximately 45 min during which intrafractional movements remain unaccounted for. This study aims to analyze the dosimetric benefit of online adaptation and to evaluate its robustness over the duration of one treatment fraction. METHODS: Baseline MR-scans at a MR-linear accelerator were acquired for ten healthy male volunteers for generation of mock-prostate SBRT plans with a dose prescription of 5 × 7.25 Gy. On a separate day, online MR-guided adaptation (ViewRay(®) MRIdian) was performed, and thereafter MR images were acquired every 15 min for 1 h to assess the stability of the adapted plan. RESULTS: A dosimetric benefit of online MR-guided adaptive re-planning was observed in 90% of volunteers. The median D(95)CTV- and D(95)PTV-coverage was improved from 34.8 to 35.5 Gy and from 30.7 to 34.6 Gy, respectively. Improved target coverage was not associated with higher dose to the organs at risk, most importantly the rectum (median D(1cc)rectum baseline plan vs. adapted plan 33.3 Gy vs. 32.3 Gy). The benefit of online adaptation remained stable over 45 min for all volunteers. However, at 60 min, CTV-coverage was below a threshold of 32.5 Gy in 30% of volunteers (30.6 Gy, 32.0 Gy, 32.3 Gy). CONCLUSION: The dosimetric benefit of MR-guided online adaptation for prostate SBRT was robust over 45 min in all volunteers. However, intrafractional uncertainties became dosimetrically relevant at 60 min and we therefore recommend verification imaging before delivery of MR-guided online adapted SBRT. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-021-01916-0. BioMed Central 2021-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8474766/ /pubmed/34565439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01916-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Schaule, J. Chamberlain, M. Wilke, L. Baumgartl, M. Krayenbühl, J. Zamburlini, M. Mayinger, M. Andratschke, N. Tanadini-Lang, S. Guckenberger, M. Intrafractional stability of MR-guided online adaptive SBRT for prostate cancer |
title | Intrafractional stability of MR-guided online adaptive SBRT for prostate cancer |
title_full | Intrafractional stability of MR-guided online adaptive SBRT for prostate cancer |
title_fullStr | Intrafractional stability of MR-guided online adaptive SBRT for prostate cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Intrafractional stability of MR-guided online adaptive SBRT for prostate cancer |
title_short | Intrafractional stability of MR-guided online adaptive SBRT for prostate cancer |
title_sort | intrafractional stability of mr-guided online adaptive sbrt for prostate cancer |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8474766/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34565439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01916-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schaulej intrafractionalstabilityofmrguidedonlineadaptivesbrtforprostatecancer AT chamberlainm intrafractionalstabilityofmrguidedonlineadaptivesbrtforprostatecancer AT wilkel intrafractionalstabilityofmrguidedonlineadaptivesbrtforprostatecancer AT baumgartlm intrafractionalstabilityofmrguidedonlineadaptivesbrtforprostatecancer AT krayenbuhlj intrafractionalstabilityofmrguidedonlineadaptivesbrtforprostatecancer AT zamburlinim intrafractionalstabilityofmrguidedonlineadaptivesbrtforprostatecancer AT mayingerm intrafractionalstabilityofmrguidedonlineadaptivesbrtforprostatecancer AT andratschken intrafractionalstabilityofmrguidedonlineadaptivesbrtforprostatecancer AT tanadinilangs intrafractionalstabilityofmrguidedonlineadaptivesbrtforprostatecancer AT guckenbergerm intrafractionalstabilityofmrguidedonlineadaptivesbrtforprostatecancer |