Cargando…

The yield of tuberculosis contact investigation in low- and middle-income settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Contact investigation, the systematic evaluation of individuals in close contact with an infectious tuberculosis (TB) patient, is a key active case-finding strategy for global TB control. Better estimates of the yield of contact investigation can guide strategies to reduce the number of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Velleca, Mariana, Malekinejad, Mohsen, Miller, Cecily, Abascal Miguel, Lucia, Reeves, Hailey, Hopewell, Philip, Fair, Elizabeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8474777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34579667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06609-3
_version_ 1784575294824251392
author Velleca, Mariana
Malekinejad, Mohsen
Miller, Cecily
Abascal Miguel, Lucia
Reeves, Hailey
Hopewell, Philip
Fair, Elizabeth
author_facet Velleca, Mariana
Malekinejad, Mohsen
Miller, Cecily
Abascal Miguel, Lucia
Reeves, Hailey
Hopewell, Philip
Fair, Elizabeth
author_sort Velleca, Mariana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Contact investigation, the systematic evaluation of individuals in close contact with an infectious tuberculosis (TB) patient, is a key active case-finding strategy for global TB control. Better estimates of the yield of contact investigation can guide strategies to reduce the number of underreported and underdiagnosed TB cases, approximately three million cases per year globally. A systematic review (Prospero ID # CRD42019133380) and meta-analysis was conducted to update and enhance the estimates of the yield of TB contact investigation in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). Pubmed, Web of Science, Embase and the WHO Global Index Medicus were searched for peer-reviewed studies (published between January 2006–April 2019); studies reporting the number of active TB or latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) found through contact investigation were included. Pooled data were meta-analyzed using a random effects model and risk of bias was assessed. RESULTS: Of 1,644 unique citations obtained from database searches, 110 studies met eligibility criteria for descriptive data synthesis and 95 for meta-analysis. The pooled yields of contact investigation activities for different outcomes were: secondary cases of all active TB (defined as those bacteriologically confirmed or clinically diagnosed) 2.87% (2.61–3.14, I(2) 97.79%), bacteriologically confirmed active TB 2.04% (1.77–2.31, I(2) 98.06%), and LTBI 43.83% (38.11–49.55, I(2) 99.36%). Yields are interpreted as the percent of contacts screened who are diagnosed with active TB as a result of TB contact investigation activities. Pooled estimates were substantially heterogenous (I(2) ≥ 75%). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides methodologically rigorous and up-to-date estimates for the yield of TB contact investigation activities in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). While the data are heterogenous, these findings can inform strategic and programmatic planning for scale up of TB contact investigation activities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8474777
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84747772021-09-28 The yield of tuberculosis contact investigation in low- and middle-income settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis Velleca, Mariana Malekinejad, Mohsen Miller, Cecily Abascal Miguel, Lucia Reeves, Hailey Hopewell, Philip Fair, Elizabeth BMC Infect Dis Research BACKGROUND: Contact investigation, the systematic evaluation of individuals in close contact with an infectious tuberculosis (TB) patient, is a key active case-finding strategy for global TB control. Better estimates of the yield of contact investigation can guide strategies to reduce the number of underreported and underdiagnosed TB cases, approximately three million cases per year globally. A systematic review (Prospero ID # CRD42019133380) and meta-analysis was conducted to update and enhance the estimates of the yield of TB contact investigation in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). Pubmed, Web of Science, Embase and the WHO Global Index Medicus were searched for peer-reviewed studies (published between January 2006–April 2019); studies reporting the number of active TB or latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) found through contact investigation were included. Pooled data were meta-analyzed using a random effects model and risk of bias was assessed. RESULTS: Of 1,644 unique citations obtained from database searches, 110 studies met eligibility criteria for descriptive data synthesis and 95 for meta-analysis. The pooled yields of contact investigation activities for different outcomes were: secondary cases of all active TB (defined as those bacteriologically confirmed or clinically diagnosed) 2.87% (2.61–3.14, I(2) 97.79%), bacteriologically confirmed active TB 2.04% (1.77–2.31, I(2) 98.06%), and LTBI 43.83% (38.11–49.55, I(2) 99.36%). Yields are interpreted as the percent of contacts screened who are diagnosed with active TB as a result of TB contact investigation activities. Pooled estimates were substantially heterogenous (I(2) ≥ 75%). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides methodologically rigorous and up-to-date estimates for the yield of TB contact investigation activities in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). While the data are heterogenous, these findings can inform strategic and programmatic planning for scale up of TB contact investigation activities. BioMed Central 2021-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8474777/ /pubmed/34579667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06609-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Velleca, Mariana
Malekinejad, Mohsen
Miller, Cecily
Abascal Miguel, Lucia
Reeves, Hailey
Hopewell, Philip
Fair, Elizabeth
The yield of tuberculosis contact investigation in low- and middle-income settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title The yield of tuberculosis contact investigation in low- and middle-income settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full The yield of tuberculosis contact investigation in low- and middle-income settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr The yield of tuberculosis contact investigation in low- and middle-income settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The yield of tuberculosis contact investigation in low- and middle-income settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short The yield of tuberculosis contact investigation in low- and middle-income settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort yield of tuberculosis contact investigation in low- and middle-income settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8474777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34579667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06609-3
work_keys_str_mv AT vellecamariana theyieldoftuberculosiscontactinvestigationinlowandmiddleincomesettingsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT malekinejadmohsen theyieldoftuberculosiscontactinvestigationinlowandmiddleincomesettingsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT millercecily theyieldoftuberculosiscontactinvestigationinlowandmiddleincomesettingsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT abascalmiguellucia theyieldoftuberculosiscontactinvestigationinlowandmiddleincomesettingsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT reeveshailey theyieldoftuberculosiscontactinvestigationinlowandmiddleincomesettingsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hopewellphilip theyieldoftuberculosiscontactinvestigationinlowandmiddleincomesettingsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fairelizabeth theyieldoftuberculosiscontactinvestigationinlowandmiddleincomesettingsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vellecamariana yieldoftuberculosiscontactinvestigationinlowandmiddleincomesettingsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT malekinejadmohsen yieldoftuberculosiscontactinvestigationinlowandmiddleincomesettingsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT millercecily yieldoftuberculosiscontactinvestigationinlowandmiddleincomesettingsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT abascalmiguellucia yieldoftuberculosiscontactinvestigationinlowandmiddleincomesettingsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT reeveshailey yieldoftuberculosiscontactinvestigationinlowandmiddleincomesettingsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hopewellphilip yieldoftuberculosiscontactinvestigationinlowandmiddleincomesettingsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fairelizabeth yieldoftuberculosiscontactinvestigationinlowandmiddleincomesettingsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis