Cargando…
The yield of tuberculosis contact investigation in low- and middle-income settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Contact investigation, the systematic evaluation of individuals in close contact with an infectious tuberculosis (TB) patient, is a key active case-finding strategy for global TB control. Better estimates of the yield of contact investigation can guide strategies to reduce the number of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8474777/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34579667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06609-3 |
_version_ | 1784575294824251392 |
---|---|
author | Velleca, Mariana Malekinejad, Mohsen Miller, Cecily Abascal Miguel, Lucia Reeves, Hailey Hopewell, Philip Fair, Elizabeth |
author_facet | Velleca, Mariana Malekinejad, Mohsen Miller, Cecily Abascal Miguel, Lucia Reeves, Hailey Hopewell, Philip Fair, Elizabeth |
author_sort | Velleca, Mariana |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Contact investigation, the systematic evaluation of individuals in close contact with an infectious tuberculosis (TB) patient, is a key active case-finding strategy for global TB control. Better estimates of the yield of contact investigation can guide strategies to reduce the number of underreported and underdiagnosed TB cases, approximately three million cases per year globally. A systematic review (Prospero ID # CRD42019133380) and meta-analysis was conducted to update and enhance the estimates of the yield of TB contact investigation in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). Pubmed, Web of Science, Embase and the WHO Global Index Medicus were searched for peer-reviewed studies (published between January 2006–April 2019); studies reporting the number of active TB or latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) found through contact investigation were included. Pooled data were meta-analyzed using a random effects model and risk of bias was assessed. RESULTS: Of 1,644 unique citations obtained from database searches, 110 studies met eligibility criteria for descriptive data synthesis and 95 for meta-analysis. The pooled yields of contact investigation activities for different outcomes were: secondary cases of all active TB (defined as those bacteriologically confirmed or clinically diagnosed) 2.87% (2.61–3.14, I(2) 97.79%), bacteriologically confirmed active TB 2.04% (1.77–2.31, I(2) 98.06%), and LTBI 43.83% (38.11–49.55, I(2) 99.36%). Yields are interpreted as the percent of contacts screened who are diagnosed with active TB as a result of TB contact investigation activities. Pooled estimates were substantially heterogenous (I(2) ≥ 75%). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides methodologically rigorous and up-to-date estimates for the yield of TB contact investigation activities in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). While the data are heterogenous, these findings can inform strategic and programmatic planning for scale up of TB contact investigation activities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8474777 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84747772021-09-28 The yield of tuberculosis contact investigation in low- and middle-income settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis Velleca, Mariana Malekinejad, Mohsen Miller, Cecily Abascal Miguel, Lucia Reeves, Hailey Hopewell, Philip Fair, Elizabeth BMC Infect Dis Research BACKGROUND: Contact investigation, the systematic evaluation of individuals in close contact with an infectious tuberculosis (TB) patient, is a key active case-finding strategy for global TB control. Better estimates of the yield of contact investigation can guide strategies to reduce the number of underreported and underdiagnosed TB cases, approximately three million cases per year globally. A systematic review (Prospero ID # CRD42019133380) and meta-analysis was conducted to update and enhance the estimates of the yield of TB contact investigation in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). Pubmed, Web of Science, Embase and the WHO Global Index Medicus were searched for peer-reviewed studies (published between January 2006–April 2019); studies reporting the number of active TB or latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) found through contact investigation were included. Pooled data were meta-analyzed using a random effects model and risk of bias was assessed. RESULTS: Of 1,644 unique citations obtained from database searches, 110 studies met eligibility criteria for descriptive data synthesis and 95 for meta-analysis. The pooled yields of contact investigation activities for different outcomes were: secondary cases of all active TB (defined as those bacteriologically confirmed or clinically diagnosed) 2.87% (2.61–3.14, I(2) 97.79%), bacteriologically confirmed active TB 2.04% (1.77–2.31, I(2) 98.06%), and LTBI 43.83% (38.11–49.55, I(2) 99.36%). Yields are interpreted as the percent of contacts screened who are diagnosed with active TB as a result of TB contact investigation activities. Pooled estimates were substantially heterogenous (I(2) ≥ 75%). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides methodologically rigorous and up-to-date estimates for the yield of TB contact investigation activities in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). While the data are heterogenous, these findings can inform strategic and programmatic planning for scale up of TB contact investigation activities. BioMed Central 2021-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8474777/ /pubmed/34579667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06609-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Velleca, Mariana Malekinejad, Mohsen Miller, Cecily Abascal Miguel, Lucia Reeves, Hailey Hopewell, Philip Fair, Elizabeth The yield of tuberculosis contact investigation in low- and middle-income settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | The yield of tuberculosis contact investigation in low- and middle-income settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | The yield of tuberculosis contact investigation in low- and middle-income settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | The yield of tuberculosis contact investigation in low- and middle-income settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The yield of tuberculosis contact investigation in low- and middle-income settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | The yield of tuberculosis contact investigation in low- and middle-income settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | yield of tuberculosis contact investigation in low- and middle-income settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8474777/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34579667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06609-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vellecamariana theyieldoftuberculosiscontactinvestigationinlowandmiddleincomesettingsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT malekinejadmohsen theyieldoftuberculosiscontactinvestigationinlowandmiddleincomesettingsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT millercecily theyieldoftuberculosiscontactinvestigationinlowandmiddleincomesettingsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT abascalmiguellucia theyieldoftuberculosiscontactinvestigationinlowandmiddleincomesettingsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT reeveshailey theyieldoftuberculosiscontactinvestigationinlowandmiddleincomesettingsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hopewellphilip theyieldoftuberculosiscontactinvestigationinlowandmiddleincomesettingsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT fairelizabeth theyieldoftuberculosiscontactinvestigationinlowandmiddleincomesettingsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT vellecamariana yieldoftuberculosiscontactinvestigationinlowandmiddleincomesettingsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT malekinejadmohsen yieldoftuberculosiscontactinvestigationinlowandmiddleincomesettingsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT millercecily yieldoftuberculosiscontactinvestigationinlowandmiddleincomesettingsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT abascalmiguellucia yieldoftuberculosiscontactinvestigationinlowandmiddleincomesettingsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT reeveshailey yieldoftuberculosiscontactinvestigationinlowandmiddleincomesettingsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hopewellphilip yieldoftuberculosiscontactinvestigationinlowandmiddleincomesettingsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT fairelizabeth yieldoftuberculosiscontactinvestigationinlowandmiddleincomesettingsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |