Cargando…

Evaluating measures of quality of life in adult scoliosis: a protocol for a systematic review and narrative synthesis

BACKGROUND: Adult scoliosis represents a distinct subgroup of scoliosis patients for whom the diagnosis can have a large impact on their health-related quality of life (HR-QOL). Therefore, HR-QOL patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are essential to assess disease progression and the impact of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Archer, James E., Baird, Charles, Gardner, Adrian, Rushton, Alison B., Heneghan, Nicola R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8474779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34565462
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01811-5
_version_ 1784575295369510912
author Archer, James E.
Baird, Charles
Gardner, Adrian
Rushton, Alison B.
Heneghan, Nicola R.
author_facet Archer, James E.
Baird, Charles
Gardner, Adrian
Rushton, Alison B.
Heneghan, Nicola R.
author_sort Archer, James E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Adult scoliosis represents a distinct subgroup of scoliosis patients for whom the diagnosis can have a large impact on their health-related quality of life (HR-QOL). Therefore, HR-QOL patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are essential to assess disease progression and the impact of interventions. The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the measurement properties of HR-QOL PROMs in adult scoliosis patients. METHODS: We will conduct a literature search, from their inception onwards, of multiple electronic databases including AMED, CINAHL, EMBASE, Medline, PsychINFO and PubMed. The searches will be performed in two stages. For both stages of the search, participants will be aged 18 and over with a diagnosis of scoliosis. The primary outcome of interest in the stage one searches will be studies which use PROMs to investigate HR-QOL as defined by the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) taxonomy, the secondary outcome will be to assess the frequency of use of the various PROMs. In stage two, the primary outcome of interest will be studies which assess the measurement properties of the HR-QOL PROMs identified in stage one. No specific measurement property will be given priority. No planned secondary outcomes have been identified but will be reported if discovered. In stage one, the only restriction on study design will be the exclusion of systematic reviews. In Stage two the only restriction on study design will be the exclusion of full-text articles not available in the English language. Two reviewers will independently screen all citations and abstract data. Potential conflicts will be resolved through discussion. The study methodological quality (or risk of bias) will be appraised using the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist. The overall strength of the body of evidence will then be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. A narrative synthesis will be provided with information presented in the main text and tables to summarise and explain the characteristics and findings of the included studies. The narrative synthesis will explore the evidence for currently used PROMs in adult scoliosis patients and any areas that require further study. DISCUSSION: The review will help clinicians and researchers identify a HR-QOL PROM for use in patients with adult scoliosis. Findings from the review will be published and disseminated through a peer-reviewed journal and conference presentations. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: This systematic review has been registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), reference number: CRD42020219437 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01811-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8474779
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84747792021-09-28 Evaluating measures of quality of life in adult scoliosis: a protocol for a systematic review and narrative synthesis Archer, James E. Baird, Charles Gardner, Adrian Rushton, Alison B. Heneghan, Nicola R. Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Adult scoliosis represents a distinct subgroup of scoliosis patients for whom the diagnosis can have a large impact on their health-related quality of life (HR-QOL). Therefore, HR-QOL patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are essential to assess disease progression and the impact of interventions. The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the measurement properties of HR-QOL PROMs in adult scoliosis patients. METHODS: We will conduct a literature search, from their inception onwards, of multiple electronic databases including AMED, CINAHL, EMBASE, Medline, PsychINFO and PubMed. The searches will be performed in two stages. For both stages of the search, participants will be aged 18 and over with a diagnosis of scoliosis. The primary outcome of interest in the stage one searches will be studies which use PROMs to investigate HR-QOL as defined by the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) taxonomy, the secondary outcome will be to assess the frequency of use of the various PROMs. In stage two, the primary outcome of interest will be studies which assess the measurement properties of the HR-QOL PROMs identified in stage one. No specific measurement property will be given priority. No planned secondary outcomes have been identified but will be reported if discovered. In stage one, the only restriction on study design will be the exclusion of systematic reviews. In Stage two the only restriction on study design will be the exclusion of full-text articles not available in the English language. Two reviewers will independently screen all citations and abstract data. Potential conflicts will be resolved through discussion. The study methodological quality (or risk of bias) will be appraised using the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist. The overall strength of the body of evidence will then be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. A narrative synthesis will be provided with information presented in the main text and tables to summarise and explain the characteristics and findings of the included studies. The narrative synthesis will explore the evidence for currently used PROMs in adult scoliosis patients and any areas that require further study. DISCUSSION: The review will help clinicians and researchers identify a HR-QOL PROM for use in patients with adult scoliosis. Findings from the review will be published and disseminated through a peer-reviewed journal and conference presentations. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: This systematic review has been registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), reference number: CRD42020219437 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01811-5. BioMed Central 2021-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8474779/ /pubmed/34565462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01811-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Protocol
Archer, James E.
Baird, Charles
Gardner, Adrian
Rushton, Alison B.
Heneghan, Nicola R.
Evaluating measures of quality of life in adult scoliosis: a protocol for a systematic review and narrative synthesis
title Evaluating measures of quality of life in adult scoliosis: a protocol for a systematic review and narrative synthesis
title_full Evaluating measures of quality of life in adult scoliosis: a protocol for a systematic review and narrative synthesis
title_fullStr Evaluating measures of quality of life in adult scoliosis: a protocol for a systematic review and narrative synthesis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating measures of quality of life in adult scoliosis: a protocol for a systematic review and narrative synthesis
title_short Evaluating measures of quality of life in adult scoliosis: a protocol for a systematic review and narrative synthesis
title_sort evaluating measures of quality of life in adult scoliosis: a protocol for a systematic review and narrative synthesis
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8474779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34565462
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01811-5
work_keys_str_mv AT archerjamese evaluatingmeasuresofqualityoflifeinadultscoliosisaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis
AT bairdcharles evaluatingmeasuresofqualityoflifeinadultscoliosisaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis
AT gardneradrian evaluatingmeasuresofqualityoflifeinadultscoliosisaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis
AT rushtonalisonb evaluatingmeasuresofqualityoflifeinadultscoliosisaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis
AT heneghannicolar evaluatingmeasuresofqualityoflifeinadultscoliosisaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis