Cargando…

A situation analysis of competences of research ethics committee members regarding review of research protocols with complex and emerging study designs in Uganda

BACKGROUND: Over the past two decades, Uganda has experienced a significant increase in clinical research driven by both academia and industry. This has been combined with a broader spectrum of research proposals, with respect to methodologies and types of intervention that need evaluation by Resear...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ainembabazi, Provia, Castelnuovo, Barbara, Okoboi, Stephen, Arinaitwe, Walter Joseph, Parkes-Ratanshi, Rosalind, Byakika-Kibwika, Pauline
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8474911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34565355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00692-6
_version_ 1784575327367856128
author Ainembabazi, Provia
Castelnuovo, Barbara
Okoboi, Stephen
Arinaitwe, Walter Joseph
Parkes-Ratanshi, Rosalind
Byakika-Kibwika, Pauline
author_facet Ainembabazi, Provia
Castelnuovo, Barbara
Okoboi, Stephen
Arinaitwe, Walter Joseph
Parkes-Ratanshi, Rosalind
Byakika-Kibwika, Pauline
author_sort Ainembabazi, Provia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Over the past two decades, Uganda has experienced a significant increase in clinical research driven by both academia and industry. This has been combined with a broader spectrum of research proposals, with respect to methodologies and types of intervention that need evaluation by Research Ethics Committees (RECs) with associated increased requirement for expertise. We assessed the competencies of REC members regarding review of research protocols with complex and emerging research study designs. The aim was to guide development of a training curriculum to improve the quality of scientific and ethical review. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study design, with quantitative data collection methods. Research Ethics Committee members completed a structured pre-coded questionnaire on current competence with complex and emerging study design. REC members were asked to outline a list of additional topics for which they needed training. Data from coded questions were entered into Epidata Version 3.1 and then exported to STATA Version14.1 for analysis. Descriptive analysis was performed and findings are presented using percentages and frequencies. RESULTS: We enrolled 55 REC members from 6 RECs who have a total of 97 members. The majority of whom were males (56.4%, n = 31/55). The level of competence for review of selected study design was lowest for Controlled Human Infection Model (10.9%, n = 6) and reverse pharmacology design (10.9%, n = 6), and highest for cluster randomized study design (52.7%, n = 29) and implementation science research (52.7%, n = 29). CONCLUSION: Competence for review of research protocols with complex and emerging study design was low among participating REC members. We recommend prioritising training of REC members on complex and emerging study designs to enhance quality of research protocol review. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12910-021-00692-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8474911
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84749112021-09-28 A situation analysis of competences of research ethics committee members regarding review of research protocols with complex and emerging study designs in Uganda Ainembabazi, Provia Castelnuovo, Barbara Okoboi, Stephen Arinaitwe, Walter Joseph Parkes-Ratanshi, Rosalind Byakika-Kibwika, Pauline BMC Med Ethics Research Article BACKGROUND: Over the past two decades, Uganda has experienced a significant increase in clinical research driven by both academia and industry. This has been combined with a broader spectrum of research proposals, with respect to methodologies and types of intervention that need evaluation by Research Ethics Committees (RECs) with associated increased requirement for expertise. We assessed the competencies of REC members regarding review of research protocols with complex and emerging research study designs. The aim was to guide development of a training curriculum to improve the quality of scientific and ethical review. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study design, with quantitative data collection methods. Research Ethics Committee members completed a structured pre-coded questionnaire on current competence with complex and emerging study design. REC members were asked to outline a list of additional topics for which they needed training. Data from coded questions were entered into Epidata Version 3.1 and then exported to STATA Version14.1 for analysis. Descriptive analysis was performed and findings are presented using percentages and frequencies. RESULTS: We enrolled 55 REC members from 6 RECs who have a total of 97 members. The majority of whom were males (56.4%, n = 31/55). The level of competence for review of selected study design was lowest for Controlled Human Infection Model (10.9%, n = 6) and reverse pharmacology design (10.9%, n = 6), and highest for cluster randomized study design (52.7%, n = 29) and implementation science research (52.7%, n = 29). CONCLUSION: Competence for review of research protocols with complex and emerging study design was low among participating REC members. We recommend prioritising training of REC members on complex and emerging study designs to enhance quality of research protocol review. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12910-021-00692-6. BioMed Central 2021-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8474911/ /pubmed/34565355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00692-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ainembabazi, Provia
Castelnuovo, Barbara
Okoboi, Stephen
Arinaitwe, Walter Joseph
Parkes-Ratanshi, Rosalind
Byakika-Kibwika, Pauline
A situation analysis of competences of research ethics committee members regarding review of research protocols with complex and emerging study designs in Uganda
title A situation analysis of competences of research ethics committee members regarding review of research protocols with complex and emerging study designs in Uganda
title_full A situation analysis of competences of research ethics committee members regarding review of research protocols with complex and emerging study designs in Uganda
title_fullStr A situation analysis of competences of research ethics committee members regarding review of research protocols with complex and emerging study designs in Uganda
title_full_unstemmed A situation analysis of competences of research ethics committee members regarding review of research protocols with complex and emerging study designs in Uganda
title_short A situation analysis of competences of research ethics committee members regarding review of research protocols with complex and emerging study designs in Uganda
title_sort situation analysis of competences of research ethics committee members regarding review of research protocols with complex and emerging study designs in uganda
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8474911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34565355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00692-6
work_keys_str_mv AT ainembabaziprovia asituationanalysisofcompetencesofresearchethicscommitteemembersregardingreviewofresearchprotocolswithcomplexandemergingstudydesignsinuganda
AT castelnuovobarbara asituationanalysisofcompetencesofresearchethicscommitteemembersregardingreviewofresearchprotocolswithcomplexandemergingstudydesignsinuganda
AT okoboistephen asituationanalysisofcompetencesofresearchethicscommitteemembersregardingreviewofresearchprotocolswithcomplexandemergingstudydesignsinuganda
AT arinaitwewalterjoseph asituationanalysisofcompetencesofresearchethicscommitteemembersregardingreviewofresearchprotocolswithcomplexandemergingstudydesignsinuganda
AT parkesratanshirosalind asituationanalysisofcompetencesofresearchethicscommitteemembersregardingreviewofresearchprotocolswithcomplexandemergingstudydesignsinuganda
AT byakikakibwikapauline asituationanalysisofcompetencesofresearchethicscommitteemembersregardingreviewofresearchprotocolswithcomplexandemergingstudydesignsinuganda
AT ainembabaziprovia situationanalysisofcompetencesofresearchethicscommitteemembersregardingreviewofresearchprotocolswithcomplexandemergingstudydesignsinuganda
AT castelnuovobarbara situationanalysisofcompetencesofresearchethicscommitteemembersregardingreviewofresearchprotocolswithcomplexandemergingstudydesignsinuganda
AT okoboistephen situationanalysisofcompetencesofresearchethicscommitteemembersregardingreviewofresearchprotocolswithcomplexandemergingstudydesignsinuganda
AT arinaitwewalterjoseph situationanalysisofcompetencesofresearchethicscommitteemembersregardingreviewofresearchprotocolswithcomplexandemergingstudydesignsinuganda
AT parkesratanshirosalind situationanalysisofcompetencesofresearchethicscommitteemembersregardingreviewofresearchprotocolswithcomplexandemergingstudydesignsinuganda
AT byakikakibwikapauline situationanalysisofcompetencesofresearchethicscommitteemembersregardingreviewofresearchprotocolswithcomplexandemergingstudydesignsinuganda