Cargando…

Insufficient classification of anaemia in general practice: a Danish register-based observational study

BACKGROUND: Anaemia can be a pointer of underlying severe disease, including undiagnosed malignancy. Subsequent blood tests are essential to classify the anaemia into subtypes and to facilitate targeted diagnostic investigation to ensure timely diagnosis of underlying disease. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boennelykke, Astrid, Jensen, Henry, Granfeldt Østgård, Lene Sofie, Falborg, Alina Zalounina, Christensen, Kaj Sparle, Hansen, Anette Tarp, Emery, Jon, Vedsted, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8475152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34330185
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2021.1958499
_version_ 1784575378458673152
author Boennelykke, Astrid
Jensen, Henry
Granfeldt Østgård, Lene Sofie
Falborg, Alina Zalounina
Christensen, Kaj Sparle
Hansen, Anette Tarp
Emery, Jon
Vedsted, Peter
author_facet Boennelykke, Astrid
Jensen, Henry
Granfeldt Østgård, Lene Sofie
Falborg, Alina Zalounina
Christensen, Kaj Sparle
Hansen, Anette Tarp
Emery, Jon
Vedsted, Peter
author_sort Boennelykke, Astrid
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Anaemia can be a pointer of underlying severe disease, including undiagnosed malignancy. Subsequent blood tests are essential to classify the anaemia into subtypes and to facilitate targeted diagnostic investigation to ensure timely diagnosis of underlying disease. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to describe and classify anaemia based on laboratory tests from patients with new-onset anaemia detected in general practice. An additional aim was to analyse associations between patient characteristics and unclassified anaemia (not classifiable according to an algorithm). DESIGN: Population-based cross-sectional study. SETTING: Danish general practice. SUBJECTS: A total of 62,731 patients (age: 40–90 years) with new-onset anaemia were identified in Danish laboratory information systems and nationwide registries, and data were obtained for 2014–2018. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We measured the proportion of patients classified into subtypes of anaemia based on blood tests requested by general practitioners within 31 days of the anaemia index date. RESULTS: Of the 62,731 patients with new-onset anaemia, we identified unclassified anaemia in 78.9% (95% confidence interval (CI): 77.3–80.5) of men and 65.1% (CI: 63.4–66.9) of women. The likelihood of unclassified anaemia increased with age, increasing comorbidity and decreasing severity of anaemia. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients with new-onset anaemia could not be classified through a simple algorithm due to missing blood tests, which highlights a potential missed opportunity for diagnosis. Standardised laboratory testing of patients with anaemia is warranted to ensure adequate follow-up and early detection of underlying severe disease. KEY POINTS: Anaemia can be a sign of malignancy, and anaemia classification is an important step in the diagnosis of underlying disorders. The majority of patients with anaemia could not be classified according to a simple algorithm due to missing blood tests. Some patient characteristics were associated with a high risk of unclassified anaemia: high age, high comorbidity, and severe anaemia. Standardised laboratory testing in patients with anaemia is needed to inform targeted diagnostic investigation to ensure timely diagnosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8475152
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84751522021-09-28 Insufficient classification of anaemia in general practice: a Danish register-based observational study Boennelykke, Astrid Jensen, Henry Granfeldt Østgård, Lene Sofie Falborg, Alina Zalounina Christensen, Kaj Sparle Hansen, Anette Tarp Emery, Jon Vedsted, Peter Scand J Prim Health Care Original Articles BACKGROUND: Anaemia can be a pointer of underlying severe disease, including undiagnosed malignancy. Subsequent blood tests are essential to classify the anaemia into subtypes and to facilitate targeted diagnostic investigation to ensure timely diagnosis of underlying disease. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to describe and classify anaemia based on laboratory tests from patients with new-onset anaemia detected in general practice. An additional aim was to analyse associations between patient characteristics and unclassified anaemia (not classifiable according to an algorithm). DESIGN: Population-based cross-sectional study. SETTING: Danish general practice. SUBJECTS: A total of 62,731 patients (age: 40–90 years) with new-onset anaemia were identified in Danish laboratory information systems and nationwide registries, and data were obtained for 2014–2018. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We measured the proportion of patients classified into subtypes of anaemia based on blood tests requested by general practitioners within 31 days of the anaemia index date. RESULTS: Of the 62,731 patients with new-onset anaemia, we identified unclassified anaemia in 78.9% (95% confidence interval (CI): 77.3–80.5) of men and 65.1% (CI: 63.4–66.9) of women. The likelihood of unclassified anaemia increased with age, increasing comorbidity and decreasing severity of anaemia. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients with new-onset anaemia could not be classified through a simple algorithm due to missing blood tests, which highlights a potential missed opportunity for diagnosis. Standardised laboratory testing of patients with anaemia is warranted to ensure adequate follow-up and early detection of underlying severe disease. KEY POINTS: Anaemia can be a sign of malignancy, and anaemia classification is an important step in the diagnosis of underlying disorders. The majority of patients with anaemia could not be classified according to a simple algorithm due to missing blood tests. Some patient characteristics were associated with a high risk of unclassified anaemia: high age, high comorbidity, and severe anaemia. Standardised laboratory testing in patients with anaemia is needed to inform targeted diagnostic investigation to ensure timely diagnosis. Taylor & Francis 2021-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8475152/ /pubmed/34330185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2021.1958499 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Boennelykke, Astrid
Jensen, Henry
Granfeldt Østgård, Lene Sofie
Falborg, Alina Zalounina
Christensen, Kaj Sparle
Hansen, Anette Tarp
Emery, Jon
Vedsted, Peter
Insufficient classification of anaemia in general practice: a Danish register-based observational study
title Insufficient classification of anaemia in general practice: a Danish register-based observational study
title_full Insufficient classification of anaemia in general practice: a Danish register-based observational study
title_fullStr Insufficient classification of anaemia in general practice: a Danish register-based observational study
title_full_unstemmed Insufficient classification of anaemia in general practice: a Danish register-based observational study
title_short Insufficient classification of anaemia in general practice: a Danish register-based observational study
title_sort insufficient classification of anaemia in general practice: a danish register-based observational study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8475152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34330185
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2021.1958499
work_keys_str_mv AT boennelykkeastrid insufficientclassificationofanaemiaingeneralpracticeadanishregisterbasedobservationalstudy
AT jensenhenry insufficientclassificationofanaemiaingeneralpracticeadanishregisterbasedobservationalstudy
AT granfeldtøstgardlenesofie insufficientclassificationofanaemiaingeneralpracticeadanishregisterbasedobservationalstudy
AT falborgalinazalounina insufficientclassificationofanaemiaingeneralpracticeadanishregisterbasedobservationalstudy
AT christensenkajsparle insufficientclassificationofanaemiaingeneralpracticeadanishregisterbasedobservationalstudy
AT hansenanettetarp insufficientclassificationofanaemiaingeneralpracticeadanishregisterbasedobservationalstudy
AT emeryjon insufficientclassificationofanaemiaingeneralpracticeadanishregisterbasedobservationalstudy
AT vedstedpeter insufficientclassificationofanaemiaingeneralpracticeadanishregisterbasedobservationalstudy