Cargando…
Impact of the Marker Set Configuration on the Accuracy of Gait Event Detection in Healthy and Pathological Subjects
For interpreting outcomes of clinical gait analysis, an accurate estimation of gait events, such as initial contact (IC) and toe-off (TO), is essential. Numerous algorithms to automatically identify timing of gait events have been developed based on various marker set configurations as input. Howeve...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8475178/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34588967 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.720699 |
_version_ | 1784575384619057152 |
---|---|
author | Visscher, Rosa M. S. Freslier, Marie Moissenet, Florent Sansgiri, Sailee Singh, Navrag B. Viehweger, Elke Taylor, William R. Brunner, Reinald |
author_facet | Visscher, Rosa M. S. Freslier, Marie Moissenet, Florent Sansgiri, Sailee Singh, Navrag B. Viehweger, Elke Taylor, William R. Brunner, Reinald |
author_sort | Visscher, Rosa M. S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | For interpreting outcomes of clinical gait analysis, an accurate estimation of gait events, such as initial contact (IC) and toe-off (TO), is essential. Numerous algorithms to automatically identify timing of gait events have been developed based on various marker set configurations as input. However, a systematic overview of the effect of the marker selection on the accuracy of estimating gait event timing is lacking. Therefore, we aim to evaluate (1) if the marker selection influences the accuracy of kinematic algorithms for estimating gait event timings and (2) what the best marker location is to ensure the highest event timing accuracy across various gait patterns. 104 individuals with cerebral palsy (16.0 ± 8.6 years) and 31 typically developing controls (age 20.6 ± 7.8) performed clinical gait analysis, and were divided into two out of eight groups based on the orientation of their foot, in sagittal and frontal plane at mid-stance. 3D marker trajectories of 11 foot/ankle markers were used to estimate the gait event timings (IC, TO) using five commonly used kinematic algorithms. Heatmaps, for IC and TO timing per group were created showing the median detection error, compared to detection using vertical ground reaction forces, for each marker. Our findings indicate that median detection errors can be kept within 7 ms for IC and 13 ms for TO when optimizing the choice of marker and detection algorithm toward foot orientation in midstance. Our results highlight that the use of markers located on the midfoot is robust for detecting gait events across different gait patterns. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8475178 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84751782021-09-28 Impact of the Marker Set Configuration on the Accuracy of Gait Event Detection in Healthy and Pathological Subjects Visscher, Rosa M. S. Freslier, Marie Moissenet, Florent Sansgiri, Sailee Singh, Navrag B. Viehweger, Elke Taylor, William R. Brunner, Reinald Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience For interpreting outcomes of clinical gait analysis, an accurate estimation of gait events, such as initial contact (IC) and toe-off (TO), is essential. Numerous algorithms to automatically identify timing of gait events have been developed based on various marker set configurations as input. However, a systematic overview of the effect of the marker selection on the accuracy of estimating gait event timing is lacking. Therefore, we aim to evaluate (1) if the marker selection influences the accuracy of kinematic algorithms for estimating gait event timings and (2) what the best marker location is to ensure the highest event timing accuracy across various gait patterns. 104 individuals with cerebral palsy (16.0 ± 8.6 years) and 31 typically developing controls (age 20.6 ± 7.8) performed clinical gait analysis, and were divided into two out of eight groups based on the orientation of their foot, in sagittal and frontal plane at mid-stance. 3D marker trajectories of 11 foot/ankle markers were used to estimate the gait event timings (IC, TO) using five commonly used kinematic algorithms. Heatmaps, for IC and TO timing per group were created showing the median detection error, compared to detection using vertical ground reaction forces, for each marker. Our findings indicate that median detection errors can be kept within 7 ms for IC and 13 ms for TO when optimizing the choice of marker and detection algorithm toward foot orientation in midstance. Our results highlight that the use of markers located on the midfoot is robust for detecting gait events across different gait patterns. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8475178/ /pubmed/34588967 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.720699 Text en Copyright © 2021 Visscher, Freslier, Moissenet, Sansgiri, Singh, Viehweger, Taylor and Brunner. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Visscher, Rosa M. S. Freslier, Marie Moissenet, Florent Sansgiri, Sailee Singh, Navrag B. Viehweger, Elke Taylor, William R. Brunner, Reinald Impact of the Marker Set Configuration on the Accuracy of Gait Event Detection in Healthy and Pathological Subjects |
title | Impact of the Marker Set Configuration on the Accuracy of Gait Event Detection in Healthy and Pathological Subjects |
title_full | Impact of the Marker Set Configuration on the Accuracy of Gait Event Detection in Healthy and Pathological Subjects |
title_fullStr | Impact of the Marker Set Configuration on the Accuracy of Gait Event Detection in Healthy and Pathological Subjects |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of the Marker Set Configuration on the Accuracy of Gait Event Detection in Healthy and Pathological Subjects |
title_short | Impact of the Marker Set Configuration on the Accuracy of Gait Event Detection in Healthy and Pathological Subjects |
title_sort | impact of the marker set configuration on the accuracy of gait event detection in healthy and pathological subjects |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8475178/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34588967 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.720699 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT visscherrosams impactofthemarkersetconfigurationontheaccuracyofgaiteventdetectioninhealthyandpathologicalsubjects AT fresliermarie impactofthemarkersetconfigurationontheaccuracyofgaiteventdetectioninhealthyandpathologicalsubjects AT moissenetflorent impactofthemarkersetconfigurationontheaccuracyofgaiteventdetectioninhealthyandpathologicalsubjects AT sansgirisailee impactofthemarkersetconfigurationontheaccuracyofgaiteventdetectioninhealthyandpathologicalsubjects AT singhnavragb impactofthemarkersetconfigurationontheaccuracyofgaiteventdetectioninhealthyandpathologicalsubjects AT viehwegerelke impactofthemarkersetconfigurationontheaccuracyofgaiteventdetectioninhealthyandpathologicalsubjects AT taylorwilliamr impactofthemarkersetconfigurationontheaccuracyofgaiteventdetectioninhealthyandpathologicalsubjects AT brunnerreinald impactofthemarkersetconfigurationontheaccuracyofgaiteventdetectioninhealthyandpathologicalsubjects |