Cargando…
Mobile Technology Improves Adherence to Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Propensity Score–Matched Study
BACKGROUND: Despite its established effectiveness, adherence to cardiac rehabilitation remains suboptimal. The purpose of our study is to examine whether mobile technology improves adherence to cardiac rehabilitation and other outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: We identified all enrollees of the cardiac...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8475674/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34278801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.020482 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Despite its established effectiveness, adherence to cardiac rehabilitation remains suboptimal. The purpose of our study is to examine whether mobile technology improves adherence to cardiac rehabilitation and other outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: We identified all enrollees of the cardiac rehabilitation program at Boston Medical Center from 2016 to 2019 (n=830). Some enrollees used a mobile technology application that provided a customized list of educational content in a progressive manner, used the patient’s smartphone accelerometer to provide daily step counts, and served as a 2‐way messaging system between the patient and program staff. Adherence to cardiac rehabilitation was defined as the number of attended sessions and completion of the program. Enrollees had a mean age of 59 years; 32% were women, and 42% were Black. Using 3:1 propensity matching for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, smoking status, transportation time, diagnosis, and baseline depression survey score, we evaluated change in exercise capacity, weight, functional capacity, and nutrition scores. Those in the mobile technology group (n=114) attended a higher number of prescribed sessions (mean 28 versus 22; relative risk, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.04–1.32; P=0.009), were 1.8 times more likely to complete the cardiac rehabilitation program (P=0.01), and had a slightly greater weight loss (pounds) following rehabilitation (−1.71; 95% CI, −0.30 to −3.11; P=0.02) as compared with those in the standard group (n=213); other outcomes were similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In a propensity‐matched, racially diverse population, we found that adjunctive use of mobile technology is significantly associated with improved adherence to cardiac rehabilitation and number of attended sessions. |
---|