Cargando…

Enterobacteriaceae and Salmonella contamination of wild boar (Sus scrofa) carcasses: comparison between different sampling strategies

During 2020, a total of 64 wild boar carcasses were tested for Enterobacteriaceae count (EBC), Salmonella and Yersinia enterocolitica in the abdominal region (i) within 5 h after hunting in the game collection point and (ii) before dressing and processing in the game-handling establishment (GHE) (49...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bonardi, Silvia, Tansini, Cesare, Cacchioli, Antonio, Soliani, Laura, Poli, Luca, Lamperti, Luca, Corradi, Margherita, Gilioli, Stefano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8475815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34602932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10344-021-01531-0
_version_ 1784575478371188736
author Bonardi, Silvia
Tansini, Cesare
Cacchioli, Antonio
Soliani, Laura
Poli, Luca
Lamperti, Luca
Corradi, Margherita
Gilioli, Stefano
author_facet Bonardi, Silvia
Tansini, Cesare
Cacchioli, Antonio
Soliani, Laura
Poli, Luca
Lamperti, Luca
Corradi, Margherita
Gilioli, Stefano
author_sort Bonardi, Silvia
collection PubMed
description During 2020, a total of 64 wild boar carcasses were tested for Enterobacteriaceae count (EBC), Salmonella and Yersinia enterocolitica in the abdominal region (i) within 5 h after hunting in the game collection point and (ii) before dressing and processing in the game-handling establishment (GHE) (49 carcasses—average time interval between (i) and (ii): 4.3 days). Because of COVID-19 restrictions, 15 carcasses were transported to a near slaughterhouse (average time interval between (i) and (ii): 2.3 days). Mesenteric lymph nodes (MLNs) were collected and tested for Salmonella and Y. enterocolitica. Results are shown in relation to sampling A (49 carcasses—GHE) and sampling B (15 carcasses—slaughterhouse). Sampling A: EBC median values were (i) 2.51 log(10) CFU/cm(2) and (ii) 2.79 log(10) CFU/cm(2). EBC increase between (i) and (ii) was statistically significant (p = 0.001). Salmonella prevalence on carcasses varied from (i) 2.0 to (ii) 6.1%. Sampling B: EBC median values were (i) 3.1 log(10) CFU/cm(2) and (ii) 3.32 log(10) CFU/cm(2). EBC increase between (i) and (ii) was not statistically significant (p = 0.191). Salmonella prevalence on carcasses varied from (i) 6.7 to (ii) 0.0%. The prevalence (sampling A + B) of lymphatic Salmonella carriers was 7.8% (5/64). From carcasses and/or MNLs, the serovars Enteritidis, Typhimurium, Agama, Zaiman and Diarizonae O:50 (z) were detected. Y. enterocolitica was never isolated. Long chilling periods prior to wild game processing should be avoided, and carcasses should be tested at GHE rather than after shooting to proper reflect the microbial load of wild boar meat entering the food chain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8475815
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84758152021-09-28 Enterobacteriaceae and Salmonella contamination of wild boar (Sus scrofa) carcasses: comparison between different sampling strategies Bonardi, Silvia Tansini, Cesare Cacchioli, Antonio Soliani, Laura Poli, Luca Lamperti, Luca Corradi, Margherita Gilioli, Stefano Eur J Wildl Res Original Article During 2020, a total of 64 wild boar carcasses were tested for Enterobacteriaceae count (EBC), Salmonella and Yersinia enterocolitica in the abdominal region (i) within 5 h after hunting in the game collection point and (ii) before dressing and processing in the game-handling establishment (GHE) (49 carcasses—average time interval between (i) and (ii): 4.3 days). Because of COVID-19 restrictions, 15 carcasses were transported to a near slaughterhouse (average time interval between (i) and (ii): 2.3 days). Mesenteric lymph nodes (MLNs) were collected and tested for Salmonella and Y. enterocolitica. Results are shown in relation to sampling A (49 carcasses—GHE) and sampling B (15 carcasses—slaughterhouse). Sampling A: EBC median values were (i) 2.51 log(10) CFU/cm(2) and (ii) 2.79 log(10) CFU/cm(2). EBC increase between (i) and (ii) was statistically significant (p = 0.001). Salmonella prevalence on carcasses varied from (i) 2.0 to (ii) 6.1%. Sampling B: EBC median values were (i) 3.1 log(10) CFU/cm(2) and (ii) 3.32 log(10) CFU/cm(2). EBC increase between (i) and (ii) was not statistically significant (p = 0.191). Salmonella prevalence on carcasses varied from (i) 6.7 to (ii) 0.0%. The prevalence (sampling A + B) of lymphatic Salmonella carriers was 7.8% (5/64). From carcasses and/or MNLs, the serovars Enteritidis, Typhimurium, Agama, Zaiman and Diarizonae O:50 (z) were detected. Y. enterocolitica was never isolated. Long chilling periods prior to wild game processing should be avoided, and carcasses should be tested at GHE rather than after shooting to proper reflect the microbial load of wild boar meat entering the food chain. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-09-25 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8475815/ /pubmed/34602932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10344-021-01531-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Bonardi, Silvia
Tansini, Cesare
Cacchioli, Antonio
Soliani, Laura
Poli, Luca
Lamperti, Luca
Corradi, Margherita
Gilioli, Stefano
Enterobacteriaceae and Salmonella contamination of wild boar (Sus scrofa) carcasses: comparison between different sampling strategies
title Enterobacteriaceae and Salmonella contamination of wild boar (Sus scrofa) carcasses: comparison between different sampling strategies
title_full Enterobacteriaceae and Salmonella contamination of wild boar (Sus scrofa) carcasses: comparison between different sampling strategies
title_fullStr Enterobacteriaceae and Salmonella contamination of wild boar (Sus scrofa) carcasses: comparison between different sampling strategies
title_full_unstemmed Enterobacteriaceae and Salmonella contamination of wild boar (Sus scrofa) carcasses: comparison between different sampling strategies
title_short Enterobacteriaceae and Salmonella contamination of wild boar (Sus scrofa) carcasses: comparison between different sampling strategies
title_sort enterobacteriaceae and salmonella contamination of wild boar (sus scrofa) carcasses: comparison between different sampling strategies
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8475815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34602932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10344-021-01531-0
work_keys_str_mv AT bonardisilvia enterobacteriaceaeandsalmonellacontaminationofwildboarsusscrofacarcassescomparisonbetweendifferentsamplingstrategies
AT tansinicesare enterobacteriaceaeandsalmonellacontaminationofwildboarsusscrofacarcassescomparisonbetweendifferentsamplingstrategies
AT cacchioliantonio enterobacteriaceaeandsalmonellacontaminationofwildboarsusscrofacarcassescomparisonbetweendifferentsamplingstrategies
AT solianilaura enterobacteriaceaeandsalmonellacontaminationofwildboarsusscrofacarcassescomparisonbetweendifferentsamplingstrategies
AT poliluca enterobacteriaceaeandsalmonellacontaminationofwildboarsusscrofacarcassescomparisonbetweendifferentsamplingstrategies
AT lampertiluca enterobacteriaceaeandsalmonellacontaminationofwildboarsusscrofacarcassescomparisonbetweendifferentsamplingstrategies
AT corradimargherita enterobacteriaceaeandsalmonellacontaminationofwildboarsusscrofacarcassescomparisonbetweendifferentsamplingstrategies
AT giliolistefano enterobacteriaceaeandsalmonellacontaminationofwildboarsusscrofacarcassescomparisonbetweendifferentsamplingstrategies