Cargando…
Distribution, behavior, and erosion of uranium in vineyard soils
Phosphate fertilization contributes to an input of uranium (U) in agricultural soils. Although its accumulation and fate in agricultural soils have been previously studied, its colloidal transport and accumulation along slopes through erosion have been studied to a lesser extent in viticulture soils...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8476358/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34021457 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14381-9 |
_version_ | 1784575594989617152 |
---|---|
author | Campos, Daniel A. Blanché, Sophia Jungkunst, Hermann F. Philippe, Allan |
author_facet | Campos, Daniel A. Blanché, Sophia Jungkunst, Hermann F. Philippe, Allan |
author_sort | Campos, Daniel A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Phosphate fertilization contributes to an input of uranium (U) in agricultural soils. Although its accumulation and fate in agricultural soils have been previously studied, its colloidal transport and accumulation along slopes through erosion have been studied to a lesser extent in viticulture soils. To bridge this gap, the contents and potential mobility of U were investigated in vineyard model soils in the Rhineland-Palatinate region, Germany. In addition to elevated U contents, U was expected to associate with colloids and subject to erosion, thus accumulating on slope foots and in soils with fine structure, and reflecting a greater variability. Moreover, another expectation was the favorable erosion/mobility of U in areas with greater carbonate content. This was tested in three regional locations, at different slope positions and through soil horizon depths, with a total of 57 soil samples. The results show that U concentrations (0.48–1.26 ppm) were slightly higher than proximal non-agricultural soils (0.50 ppm), quite homogenous along slope positions, and slightly higher in topsoils. Assuming a homogeneous fertilization, the vertical translocation of U in soil was most probably higher than along the slope by erosion. In addition, carbonate content and soil texture correlated with U concentrations, whereas other parameters such as organic carbon and iron contents did not. The central role of carbonate and soil texture for the prediction of U content was confirmed using decision trees and elastic net, although their limited prediction power suggests that a larger sample size with a larger range of U content is required to improve the accuracy. Overall, we did not observe neither U nor colloids accumulating on slope foots, thus suggesting that soils are aggregate-stable. Lastly, we suggested considering further soil parameters (e.g., Ca(2+), phosphorus, alkali metals) in future works to improve our modelling approach. Overall, our results suggest U is fortunately immobile in the studied locations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11356-021-14381-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8476358 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84763582021-10-08 Distribution, behavior, and erosion of uranium in vineyard soils Campos, Daniel A. Blanché, Sophia Jungkunst, Hermann F. Philippe, Allan Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Research Article Phosphate fertilization contributes to an input of uranium (U) in agricultural soils. Although its accumulation and fate in agricultural soils have been previously studied, its colloidal transport and accumulation along slopes through erosion have been studied to a lesser extent in viticulture soils. To bridge this gap, the contents and potential mobility of U were investigated in vineyard model soils in the Rhineland-Palatinate region, Germany. In addition to elevated U contents, U was expected to associate with colloids and subject to erosion, thus accumulating on slope foots and in soils with fine structure, and reflecting a greater variability. Moreover, another expectation was the favorable erosion/mobility of U in areas with greater carbonate content. This was tested in three regional locations, at different slope positions and through soil horizon depths, with a total of 57 soil samples. The results show that U concentrations (0.48–1.26 ppm) were slightly higher than proximal non-agricultural soils (0.50 ppm), quite homogenous along slope positions, and slightly higher in topsoils. Assuming a homogeneous fertilization, the vertical translocation of U in soil was most probably higher than along the slope by erosion. In addition, carbonate content and soil texture correlated with U concentrations, whereas other parameters such as organic carbon and iron contents did not. The central role of carbonate and soil texture for the prediction of U content was confirmed using decision trees and elastic net, although their limited prediction power suggests that a larger sample size with a larger range of U content is required to improve the accuracy. Overall, we did not observe neither U nor colloids accumulating on slope foots, thus suggesting that soils are aggregate-stable. Lastly, we suggested considering further soil parameters (e.g., Ca(2+), phosphorus, alkali metals) in future works to improve our modelling approach. Overall, our results suggest U is fortunately immobile in the studied locations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11356-021-14381-9. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-05-22 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8476358/ /pubmed/34021457 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14381-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Article Campos, Daniel A. Blanché, Sophia Jungkunst, Hermann F. Philippe, Allan Distribution, behavior, and erosion of uranium in vineyard soils |
title | Distribution, behavior, and erosion of uranium in vineyard soils |
title_full | Distribution, behavior, and erosion of uranium in vineyard soils |
title_fullStr | Distribution, behavior, and erosion of uranium in vineyard soils |
title_full_unstemmed | Distribution, behavior, and erosion of uranium in vineyard soils |
title_short | Distribution, behavior, and erosion of uranium in vineyard soils |
title_sort | distribution, behavior, and erosion of uranium in vineyard soils |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8476358/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34021457 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14381-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT camposdaniela distributionbehavioranderosionofuraniuminvineyardsoils AT blanchesophia distributionbehavioranderosionofuraniuminvineyardsoils AT jungkunsthermannf distributionbehavioranderosionofuraniuminvineyardsoils AT philippeallan distributionbehavioranderosionofuraniuminvineyardsoils |