Cargando…

Lagos state ambulance service: a performance evaluation

OBJECTIVES: The mortality rate from road traffic accidents (RTAs) in Nigeria is almost double that of the USA. In Nigeria, the first emergency medical services (EMS) system was established in March 2001, The Lagos State Ambulance Service (LASAMBUS). The objectives of this study are to (1) determine...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Venkatraman, Chinmayee, Odusola, Aina Olufemi, Malolan, Chenchita, Kola-Korolo, Olusegun, Olaomi, Oluwole, Idris, Jide, Nwariaku, Fiemu E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8476380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32157342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-020-01319-y
_version_ 1784575600097230848
author Venkatraman, Chinmayee
Odusola, Aina Olufemi
Malolan, Chenchita
Kola-Korolo, Olusegun
Olaomi, Oluwole
Idris, Jide
Nwariaku, Fiemu E.
author_facet Venkatraman, Chinmayee
Odusola, Aina Olufemi
Malolan, Chenchita
Kola-Korolo, Olusegun
Olaomi, Oluwole
Idris, Jide
Nwariaku, Fiemu E.
author_sort Venkatraman, Chinmayee
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The mortality rate from road traffic accidents (RTAs) in Nigeria is almost double that of the USA. In Nigeria, the first emergency medical services (EMS) system was established in March 2001, The Lagos State Ambulance Service (LASAMBUS). The objectives of this study are to (1) determine the burden of RTAs in Lagos, (2) assess RTA call outcomes, and (3) analyze LASAMBUS’s response time and causes for delay. METHODOLOGY: We reviewed completed LASAMBUS intervention forms spanning December 2017 to May 2018. We categorized the call outcomes into five groups: I. Addressed Crash, II. No Crash (False Call), III. Crash Already Addressed, IV. Did Not Respond, and V. Other. We further explored associations between the (1) causes for delay and outcomes and (2) response times and the outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, we analyzed 1352 intervention forms. We found that LASAMBUS did not address 53% of the RTA calls that they received. Of this, Outcome II. No Crash (False Call) accounted for 26% and Outcome III. Crash Already Addressed accounted for 22%. Self-reported causes for delay were recorded in 180 forms, representing 13.7% of the RTA burden. Traffic congestion accounted for 60% of this distribution. CONCLUSION: LASAMBUS response rates are significantly lower than response rates in high-income countries such as the USA and lead to increased RTA mortality rates. Eliminating causes for delay will improve both LASAMBUS effectiveness and RTA victims’ health outcomes. Changing the public perception of LASAMBUS and standardizing LASAMBUS’ contact information will aid this as well. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00068-020-01319-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8476380
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84763802021-10-08 Lagos state ambulance service: a performance evaluation Venkatraman, Chinmayee Odusola, Aina Olufemi Malolan, Chenchita Kola-Korolo, Olusegun Olaomi, Oluwole Idris, Jide Nwariaku, Fiemu E. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Original Article OBJECTIVES: The mortality rate from road traffic accidents (RTAs) in Nigeria is almost double that of the USA. In Nigeria, the first emergency medical services (EMS) system was established in March 2001, The Lagos State Ambulance Service (LASAMBUS). The objectives of this study are to (1) determine the burden of RTAs in Lagos, (2) assess RTA call outcomes, and (3) analyze LASAMBUS’s response time and causes for delay. METHODOLOGY: We reviewed completed LASAMBUS intervention forms spanning December 2017 to May 2018. We categorized the call outcomes into five groups: I. Addressed Crash, II. No Crash (False Call), III. Crash Already Addressed, IV. Did Not Respond, and V. Other. We further explored associations between the (1) causes for delay and outcomes and (2) response times and the outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, we analyzed 1352 intervention forms. We found that LASAMBUS did not address 53% of the RTA calls that they received. Of this, Outcome II. No Crash (False Call) accounted for 26% and Outcome III. Crash Already Addressed accounted for 22%. Self-reported causes for delay were recorded in 180 forms, representing 13.7% of the RTA burden. Traffic congestion accounted for 60% of this distribution. CONCLUSION: LASAMBUS response rates are significantly lower than response rates in high-income countries such as the USA and lead to increased RTA mortality rates. Eliminating causes for delay will improve both LASAMBUS effectiveness and RTA victims’ health outcomes. Changing the public perception of LASAMBUS and standardizing LASAMBUS’ contact information will aid this as well. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00068-020-01319-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-03-10 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8476380/ /pubmed/32157342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-020-01319-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Venkatraman, Chinmayee
Odusola, Aina Olufemi
Malolan, Chenchita
Kola-Korolo, Olusegun
Olaomi, Oluwole
Idris, Jide
Nwariaku, Fiemu E.
Lagos state ambulance service: a performance evaluation
title Lagos state ambulance service: a performance evaluation
title_full Lagos state ambulance service: a performance evaluation
title_fullStr Lagos state ambulance service: a performance evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Lagos state ambulance service: a performance evaluation
title_short Lagos state ambulance service: a performance evaluation
title_sort lagos state ambulance service: a performance evaluation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8476380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32157342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-020-01319-y
work_keys_str_mv AT venkatramanchinmayee lagosstateambulanceserviceaperformanceevaluation
AT odusolaainaolufemi lagosstateambulanceserviceaperformanceevaluation
AT malolanchenchita lagosstateambulanceserviceaperformanceevaluation
AT kolakoroloolusegun lagosstateambulanceserviceaperformanceevaluation
AT olaomioluwole lagosstateambulanceserviceaperformanceevaluation
AT idrisjide lagosstateambulanceserviceaperformanceevaluation
AT nwariakufiemue lagosstateambulanceserviceaperformanceevaluation