Cargando…
Monetary incentives have only limited effects on auditory distraction: evidence for the automaticity of cross-modal attention capture
The duplex-mechanism account of auditory distraction postulates that two distinct forms of auditory distraction can be distinguished by whether or not they can be cognitively controlled. While the interference-by-process component of auditory distraction is postulated to be automatic and independent...
Autores principales: | Bell, Raoul, Mieth, Laura, Buchner, Axel, Röer, Jan Philipp |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8476381/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33340342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01455-5 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Effects of Auditory Distraction on Face Memory
por: Bell, Raoul, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
The metacognition of auditory distraction: Judgments about the effects of deviating and changing auditory distractors on cognitive performance
por: Bell, Raoul, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Negative target stimuli do not influence cross-modal auditory distraction
por: Kaiser, Saskia, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
What Determines Auditory Distraction? On the Roles of Local Auditory Changes and Expectation Violations
por: Röer, Jan P., et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Metacognition in Auditory Distraction: How Expectations about Distractibility Influence the Irrelevant Sound Effect
por: Röer, Jan Philipp, et al.
Publicado: (2017)