Cargando…

Discrimination Between Invasive and In Situ Melanomas Using Clinical Close-Up Images and a De Novo Convolutional Neural Network

Background: Melanomas are often easy to recognize clinically but determining whether a melanoma is in situ (MIS) or invasive is often more challenging even with the aid of dermoscopy. Recently, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have made significant and rapid advances within dermatology image ana...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Polesie, Sam, Gillstedt, Martin, Ahlgren, Gustav, Ceder, Hannah, Dahlén Gyllencreutz, Johan, Fougelberg, Julia, Johansson Backman, Eva, Pakka, Jenna, Zaar, Oscar, Paoli, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8476836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34595193
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.723914
_version_ 1784575703740579840
author Polesie, Sam
Gillstedt, Martin
Ahlgren, Gustav
Ceder, Hannah
Dahlén Gyllencreutz, Johan
Fougelberg, Julia
Johansson Backman, Eva
Pakka, Jenna
Zaar, Oscar
Paoli, John
author_facet Polesie, Sam
Gillstedt, Martin
Ahlgren, Gustav
Ceder, Hannah
Dahlén Gyllencreutz, Johan
Fougelberg, Julia
Johansson Backman, Eva
Pakka, Jenna
Zaar, Oscar
Paoli, John
author_sort Polesie, Sam
collection PubMed
description Background: Melanomas are often easy to recognize clinically but determining whether a melanoma is in situ (MIS) or invasive is often more challenging even with the aid of dermoscopy. Recently, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have made significant and rapid advances within dermatology image analysis. The aims of this investigation were to create a de novo CNN for differentiating between MIS and invasive melanomas based on clinical close-up images and to compare its performance on a test set to seven dermatologists. Methods: A retrospective study including clinical images of MIS and invasive melanomas obtained from our department during a five-year time period (2016–2020) was conducted. Overall, 1,551 images [819 MIS (52.8%) and 732 invasive melanomas (47.2%)] were available. The images were randomized into three groups: training set (n = 1,051), validation set (n = 200), and test set (n = 300). A de novo CNN model with seven convolutional layers and a single dense layer was developed. Results: The area under the curve was 0.72 for the CNN (95% CI 0.66–0.78) and 0.81 for dermatologists (95% CI 0.76–0.86) (P < 0.001). The CNN correctly classified 208 out of 300 lesions (69.3%) whereas the corresponding number for dermatologists was 216 (72.0%). When comparing the CNN performance to each individual reader, three dermatologists significantly outperformed the CNN. Conclusions: For this classification problem, the CNN was outperformed by the dermatologist. However, since the algorithm was only trained and validated on 1,251 images, future refinement and development could make it useful for dermatologists in a real-world setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8476836
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84768362021-09-29 Discrimination Between Invasive and In Situ Melanomas Using Clinical Close-Up Images and a De Novo Convolutional Neural Network Polesie, Sam Gillstedt, Martin Ahlgren, Gustav Ceder, Hannah Dahlén Gyllencreutz, Johan Fougelberg, Julia Johansson Backman, Eva Pakka, Jenna Zaar, Oscar Paoli, John Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine Background: Melanomas are often easy to recognize clinically but determining whether a melanoma is in situ (MIS) or invasive is often more challenging even with the aid of dermoscopy. Recently, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have made significant and rapid advances within dermatology image analysis. The aims of this investigation were to create a de novo CNN for differentiating between MIS and invasive melanomas based on clinical close-up images and to compare its performance on a test set to seven dermatologists. Methods: A retrospective study including clinical images of MIS and invasive melanomas obtained from our department during a five-year time period (2016–2020) was conducted. Overall, 1,551 images [819 MIS (52.8%) and 732 invasive melanomas (47.2%)] were available. The images were randomized into three groups: training set (n = 1,051), validation set (n = 200), and test set (n = 300). A de novo CNN model with seven convolutional layers and a single dense layer was developed. Results: The area under the curve was 0.72 for the CNN (95% CI 0.66–0.78) and 0.81 for dermatologists (95% CI 0.76–0.86) (P < 0.001). The CNN correctly classified 208 out of 300 lesions (69.3%) whereas the corresponding number for dermatologists was 216 (72.0%). When comparing the CNN performance to each individual reader, three dermatologists significantly outperformed the CNN. Conclusions: For this classification problem, the CNN was outperformed by the dermatologist. However, since the algorithm was only trained and validated on 1,251 images, future refinement and development could make it useful for dermatologists in a real-world setting. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8476836/ /pubmed/34595193 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.723914 Text en Copyright © 2021 Polesie, Gillstedt, Ahlgren, Ceder, Dahlén Gyllencreutz, Fougelberg, Johansson Backman, Pakka, Zaar and Paoli. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Polesie, Sam
Gillstedt, Martin
Ahlgren, Gustav
Ceder, Hannah
Dahlén Gyllencreutz, Johan
Fougelberg, Julia
Johansson Backman, Eva
Pakka, Jenna
Zaar, Oscar
Paoli, John
Discrimination Between Invasive and In Situ Melanomas Using Clinical Close-Up Images and a De Novo Convolutional Neural Network
title Discrimination Between Invasive and In Situ Melanomas Using Clinical Close-Up Images and a De Novo Convolutional Neural Network
title_full Discrimination Between Invasive and In Situ Melanomas Using Clinical Close-Up Images and a De Novo Convolutional Neural Network
title_fullStr Discrimination Between Invasive and In Situ Melanomas Using Clinical Close-Up Images and a De Novo Convolutional Neural Network
title_full_unstemmed Discrimination Between Invasive and In Situ Melanomas Using Clinical Close-Up Images and a De Novo Convolutional Neural Network
title_short Discrimination Between Invasive and In Situ Melanomas Using Clinical Close-Up Images and a De Novo Convolutional Neural Network
title_sort discrimination between invasive and in situ melanomas using clinical close-up images and a de novo convolutional neural network
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8476836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34595193
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.723914
work_keys_str_mv AT polesiesam discriminationbetweeninvasiveandinsitumelanomasusingclinicalcloseupimagesandadenovoconvolutionalneuralnetwork
AT gillstedtmartin discriminationbetweeninvasiveandinsitumelanomasusingclinicalcloseupimagesandadenovoconvolutionalneuralnetwork
AT ahlgrengustav discriminationbetweeninvasiveandinsitumelanomasusingclinicalcloseupimagesandadenovoconvolutionalneuralnetwork
AT cederhannah discriminationbetweeninvasiveandinsitumelanomasusingclinicalcloseupimagesandadenovoconvolutionalneuralnetwork
AT dahlengyllencreutzjohan discriminationbetweeninvasiveandinsitumelanomasusingclinicalcloseupimagesandadenovoconvolutionalneuralnetwork
AT fougelbergjulia discriminationbetweeninvasiveandinsitumelanomasusingclinicalcloseupimagesandadenovoconvolutionalneuralnetwork
AT johanssonbackmaneva discriminationbetweeninvasiveandinsitumelanomasusingclinicalcloseupimagesandadenovoconvolutionalneuralnetwork
AT pakkajenna discriminationbetweeninvasiveandinsitumelanomasusingclinicalcloseupimagesandadenovoconvolutionalneuralnetwork
AT zaaroscar discriminationbetweeninvasiveandinsitumelanomasusingclinicalcloseupimagesandadenovoconvolutionalneuralnetwork
AT paolijohn discriminationbetweeninvasiveandinsitumelanomasusingclinicalcloseupimagesandadenovoconvolutionalneuralnetwork