Cargando…
Discrimination Between Invasive and In Situ Melanomas Using Clinical Close-Up Images and a De Novo Convolutional Neural Network
Background: Melanomas are often easy to recognize clinically but determining whether a melanoma is in situ (MIS) or invasive is often more challenging even with the aid of dermoscopy. Recently, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have made significant and rapid advances within dermatology image ana...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8476836/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34595193 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.723914 |
_version_ | 1784575703740579840 |
---|---|
author | Polesie, Sam Gillstedt, Martin Ahlgren, Gustav Ceder, Hannah Dahlén Gyllencreutz, Johan Fougelberg, Julia Johansson Backman, Eva Pakka, Jenna Zaar, Oscar Paoli, John |
author_facet | Polesie, Sam Gillstedt, Martin Ahlgren, Gustav Ceder, Hannah Dahlén Gyllencreutz, Johan Fougelberg, Julia Johansson Backman, Eva Pakka, Jenna Zaar, Oscar Paoli, John |
author_sort | Polesie, Sam |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Melanomas are often easy to recognize clinically but determining whether a melanoma is in situ (MIS) or invasive is often more challenging even with the aid of dermoscopy. Recently, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have made significant and rapid advances within dermatology image analysis. The aims of this investigation were to create a de novo CNN for differentiating between MIS and invasive melanomas based on clinical close-up images and to compare its performance on a test set to seven dermatologists. Methods: A retrospective study including clinical images of MIS and invasive melanomas obtained from our department during a five-year time period (2016–2020) was conducted. Overall, 1,551 images [819 MIS (52.8%) and 732 invasive melanomas (47.2%)] were available. The images were randomized into three groups: training set (n = 1,051), validation set (n = 200), and test set (n = 300). A de novo CNN model with seven convolutional layers and a single dense layer was developed. Results: The area under the curve was 0.72 for the CNN (95% CI 0.66–0.78) and 0.81 for dermatologists (95% CI 0.76–0.86) (P < 0.001). The CNN correctly classified 208 out of 300 lesions (69.3%) whereas the corresponding number for dermatologists was 216 (72.0%). When comparing the CNN performance to each individual reader, three dermatologists significantly outperformed the CNN. Conclusions: For this classification problem, the CNN was outperformed by the dermatologist. However, since the algorithm was only trained and validated on 1,251 images, future refinement and development could make it useful for dermatologists in a real-world setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8476836 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84768362021-09-29 Discrimination Between Invasive and In Situ Melanomas Using Clinical Close-Up Images and a De Novo Convolutional Neural Network Polesie, Sam Gillstedt, Martin Ahlgren, Gustav Ceder, Hannah Dahlén Gyllencreutz, Johan Fougelberg, Julia Johansson Backman, Eva Pakka, Jenna Zaar, Oscar Paoli, John Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine Background: Melanomas are often easy to recognize clinically but determining whether a melanoma is in situ (MIS) or invasive is often more challenging even with the aid of dermoscopy. Recently, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have made significant and rapid advances within dermatology image analysis. The aims of this investigation were to create a de novo CNN for differentiating between MIS and invasive melanomas based on clinical close-up images and to compare its performance on a test set to seven dermatologists. Methods: A retrospective study including clinical images of MIS and invasive melanomas obtained from our department during a five-year time period (2016–2020) was conducted. Overall, 1,551 images [819 MIS (52.8%) and 732 invasive melanomas (47.2%)] were available. The images were randomized into three groups: training set (n = 1,051), validation set (n = 200), and test set (n = 300). A de novo CNN model with seven convolutional layers and a single dense layer was developed. Results: The area under the curve was 0.72 for the CNN (95% CI 0.66–0.78) and 0.81 for dermatologists (95% CI 0.76–0.86) (P < 0.001). The CNN correctly classified 208 out of 300 lesions (69.3%) whereas the corresponding number for dermatologists was 216 (72.0%). When comparing the CNN performance to each individual reader, three dermatologists significantly outperformed the CNN. Conclusions: For this classification problem, the CNN was outperformed by the dermatologist. However, since the algorithm was only trained and validated on 1,251 images, future refinement and development could make it useful for dermatologists in a real-world setting. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8476836/ /pubmed/34595193 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.723914 Text en Copyright © 2021 Polesie, Gillstedt, Ahlgren, Ceder, Dahlén Gyllencreutz, Fougelberg, Johansson Backman, Pakka, Zaar and Paoli. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Medicine Polesie, Sam Gillstedt, Martin Ahlgren, Gustav Ceder, Hannah Dahlén Gyllencreutz, Johan Fougelberg, Julia Johansson Backman, Eva Pakka, Jenna Zaar, Oscar Paoli, John Discrimination Between Invasive and In Situ Melanomas Using Clinical Close-Up Images and a De Novo Convolutional Neural Network |
title | Discrimination Between Invasive and In Situ Melanomas Using Clinical Close-Up Images and a De Novo Convolutional Neural Network |
title_full | Discrimination Between Invasive and In Situ Melanomas Using Clinical Close-Up Images and a De Novo Convolutional Neural Network |
title_fullStr | Discrimination Between Invasive and In Situ Melanomas Using Clinical Close-Up Images and a De Novo Convolutional Neural Network |
title_full_unstemmed | Discrimination Between Invasive and In Situ Melanomas Using Clinical Close-Up Images and a De Novo Convolutional Neural Network |
title_short | Discrimination Between Invasive and In Situ Melanomas Using Clinical Close-Up Images and a De Novo Convolutional Neural Network |
title_sort | discrimination between invasive and in situ melanomas using clinical close-up images and a de novo convolutional neural network |
topic | Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8476836/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34595193 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.723914 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT polesiesam discriminationbetweeninvasiveandinsitumelanomasusingclinicalcloseupimagesandadenovoconvolutionalneuralnetwork AT gillstedtmartin discriminationbetweeninvasiveandinsitumelanomasusingclinicalcloseupimagesandadenovoconvolutionalneuralnetwork AT ahlgrengustav discriminationbetweeninvasiveandinsitumelanomasusingclinicalcloseupimagesandadenovoconvolutionalneuralnetwork AT cederhannah discriminationbetweeninvasiveandinsitumelanomasusingclinicalcloseupimagesandadenovoconvolutionalneuralnetwork AT dahlengyllencreutzjohan discriminationbetweeninvasiveandinsitumelanomasusingclinicalcloseupimagesandadenovoconvolutionalneuralnetwork AT fougelbergjulia discriminationbetweeninvasiveandinsitumelanomasusingclinicalcloseupimagesandadenovoconvolutionalneuralnetwork AT johanssonbackmaneva discriminationbetweeninvasiveandinsitumelanomasusingclinicalcloseupimagesandadenovoconvolutionalneuralnetwork AT pakkajenna discriminationbetweeninvasiveandinsitumelanomasusingclinicalcloseupimagesandadenovoconvolutionalneuralnetwork AT zaaroscar discriminationbetweeninvasiveandinsitumelanomasusingclinicalcloseupimagesandadenovoconvolutionalneuralnetwork AT paolijohn discriminationbetweeninvasiveandinsitumelanomasusingclinicalcloseupimagesandadenovoconvolutionalneuralnetwork |