Cargando…

Beam Angle Optimization for Double-Scattering Proton Delivery Technique Using an Eclipse Application Programming Interface and Convolutional Neural Network

To automatically identify optimal beam angles for proton therapy configured with the double-scattering delivery technique, a beam angle optimization method based on a convolutional neural network (BAODS-Net) is proposed. Fifty liver plans were used for training in BAODS-Net. To generate a sequence o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheon, Wonjoong, Ahn, Sang Hee, Jeong, Seonghoon, Lee, Se Byeong, Shin, Dongho, Lim, Young Kyung, Jeong, Jong Hwi, Youn, Sang Hee, Lee, Sung Uk, Moon, Sung Ho, Kim, Tae Hyun, Kim, Haksoo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8476903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34595112
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.707464
Descripción
Sumario:To automatically identify optimal beam angles for proton therapy configured with the double-scattering delivery technique, a beam angle optimization method based on a convolutional neural network (BAODS-Net) is proposed. Fifty liver plans were used for training in BAODS-Net. To generate a sequence of input data, 25 rays on the eye view of the beam were determined per angle. Each ray collects nine features, including the normalized Hounsfield unit and the position information of eight structures per 2° of gantry angle. The outputs are a set of beam angle ranking scores (S (beam)) ranging from 0° to 359°, with a step size of 1°. Based on these input and output designs, BAODS-Net consists of eight convolution layers and four fully connected layers. To evaluate the plan qualities of deep-learning, equi-spaced, and clinical plans, we compared the performances of three types of loss functions and performed K-fold cross-validation (K = 5). For statistical analysis, the volumes V(27Gy) and V(30Gy) as well as the mean, minimum, and maximum doses were calculated for organs-at-risk by using a paired-samples t-test. As a result, smooth-L1 loss showed the best optimization performance. At the end of the training procedure, the mean squared errors between the reference and predicted S (beam) were 0.031, 0.011, and 0.004 for L1, L2, and smooth-L1 loss, respectively. In terms of the plan quality, statistically, Plan(BAO) has no significant difference from Plan(Clinic) (P >.05). In our test, a deep-learning based beam angle optimization method for proton double-scattering treatments was developed and verified. Using Eclipse API and BAODS-Net, a plan with clinically acceptable quality was created within 5 min.