Cargando…

Beam Angle Optimization for Double-Scattering Proton Delivery Technique Using an Eclipse Application Programming Interface and Convolutional Neural Network

To automatically identify optimal beam angles for proton therapy configured with the double-scattering delivery technique, a beam angle optimization method based on a convolutional neural network (BAODS-Net) is proposed. Fifty liver plans were used for training in BAODS-Net. To generate a sequence o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheon, Wonjoong, Ahn, Sang Hee, Jeong, Seonghoon, Lee, Se Byeong, Shin, Dongho, Lim, Young Kyung, Jeong, Jong Hwi, Youn, Sang Hee, Lee, Sung Uk, Moon, Sung Ho, Kim, Tae Hyun, Kim, Haksoo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8476903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34595112
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.707464
_version_ 1784575721066201088
author Cheon, Wonjoong
Ahn, Sang Hee
Jeong, Seonghoon
Lee, Se Byeong
Shin, Dongho
Lim, Young Kyung
Jeong, Jong Hwi
Youn, Sang Hee
Lee, Sung Uk
Moon, Sung Ho
Kim, Tae Hyun
Kim, Haksoo
author_facet Cheon, Wonjoong
Ahn, Sang Hee
Jeong, Seonghoon
Lee, Se Byeong
Shin, Dongho
Lim, Young Kyung
Jeong, Jong Hwi
Youn, Sang Hee
Lee, Sung Uk
Moon, Sung Ho
Kim, Tae Hyun
Kim, Haksoo
author_sort Cheon, Wonjoong
collection PubMed
description To automatically identify optimal beam angles for proton therapy configured with the double-scattering delivery technique, a beam angle optimization method based on a convolutional neural network (BAODS-Net) is proposed. Fifty liver plans were used for training in BAODS-Net. To generate a sequence of input data, 25 rays on the eye view of the beam were determined per angle. Each ray collects nine features, including the normalized Hounsfield unit and the position information of eight structures per 2° of gantry angle. The outputs are a set of beam angle ranking scores (S (beam)) ranging from 0° to 359°, with a step size of 1°. Based on these input and output designs, BAODS-Net consists of eight convolution layers and four fully connected layers. To evaluate the plan qualities of deep-learning, equi-spaced, and clinical plans, we compared the performances of three types of loss functions and performed K-fold cross-validation (K = 5). For statistical analysis, the volumes V(27Gy) and V(30Gy) as well as the mean, minimum, and maximum doses were calculated for organs-at-risk by using a paired-samples t-test. As a result, smooth-L1 loss showed the best optimization performance. At the end of the training procedure, the mean squared errors between the reference and predicted S (beam) were 0.031, 0.011, and 0.004 for L1, L2, and smooth-L1 loss, respectively. In terms of the plan quality, statistically, Plan(BAO) has no significant difference from Plan(Clinic) (P >.05). In our test, a deep-learning based beam angle optimization method for proton double-scattering treatments was developed and verified. Using Eclipse API and BAODS-Net, a plan with clinically acceptable quality was created within 5 min.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8476903
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84769032021-09-29 Beam Angle Optimization for Double-Scattering Proton Delivery Technique Using an Eclipse Application Programming Interface and Convolutional Neural Network Cheon, Wonjoong Ahn, Sang Hee Jeong, Seonghoon Lee, Se Byeong Shin, Dongho Lim, Young Kyung Jeong, Jong Hwi Youn, Sang Hee Lee, Sung Uk Moon, Sung Ho Kim, Tae Hyun Kim, Haksoo Front Oncol Oncology To automatically identify optimal beam angles for proton therapy configured with the double-scattering delivery technique, a beam angle optimization method based on a convolutional neural network (BAODS-Net) is proposed. Fifty liver plans were used for training in BAODS-Net. To generate a sequence of input data, 25 rays on the eye view of the beam were determined per angle. Each ray collects nine features, including the normalized Hounsfield unit and the position information of eight structures per 2° of gantry angle. The outputs are a set of beam angle ranking scores (S (beam)) ranging from 0° to 359°, with a step size of 1°. Based on these input and output designs, BAODS-Net consists of eight convolution layers and four fully connected layers. To evaluate the plan qualities of deep-learning, equi-spaced, and clinical plans, we compared the performances of three types of loss functions and performed K-fold cross-validation (K = 5). For statistical analysis, the volumes V(27Gy) and V(30Gy) as well as the mean, minimum, and maximum doses were calculated for organs-at-risk by using a paired-samples t-test. As a result, smooth-L1 loss showed the best optimization performance. At the end of the training procedure, the mean squared errors between the reference and predicted S (beam) were 0.031, 0.011, and 0.004 for L1, L2, and smooth-L1 loss, respectively. In terms of the plan quality, statistically, Plan(BAO) has no significant difference from Plan(Clinic) (P >.05). In our test, a deep-learning based beam angle optimization method for proton double-scattering treatments was developed and verified. Using Eclipse API and BAODS-Net, a plan with clinically acceptable quality was created within 5 min. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8476903/ /pubmed/34595112 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.707464 Text en Copyright © 2021 Cheon, Ahn, Jeong, Lee, Shin, Lim, Jeong, Youn, Lee, Moon, Kim and Kim https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Cheon, Wonjoong
Ahn, Sang Hee
Jeong, Seonghoon
Lee, Se Byeong
Shin, Dongho
Lim, Young Kyung
Jeong, Jong Hwi
Youn, Sang Hee
Lee, Sung Uk
Moon, Sung Ho
Kim, Tae Hyun
Kim, Haksoo
Beam Angle Optimization for Double-Scattering Proton Delivery Technique Using an Eclipse Application Programming Interface and Convolutional Neural Network
title Beam Angle Optimization for Double-Scattering Proton Delivery Technique Using an Eclipse Application Programming Interface and Convolutional Neural Network
title_full Beam Angle Optimization for Double-Scattering Proton Delivery Technique Using an Eclipse Application Programming Interface and Convolutional Neural Network
title_fullStr Beam Angle Optimization for Double-Scattering Proton Delivery Technique Using an Eclipse Application Programming Interface and Convolutional Neural Network
title_full_unstemmed Beam Angle Optimization for Double-Scattering Proton Delivery Technique Using an Eclipse Application Programming Interface and Convolutional Neural Network
title_short Beam Angle Optimization for Double-Scattering Proton Delivery Technique Using an Eclipse Application Programming Interface and Convolutional Neural Network
title_sort beam angle optimization for double-scattering proton delivery technique using an eclipse application programming interface and convolutional neural network
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8476903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34595112
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.707464
work_keys_str_mv AT cheonwonjoong beamangleoptimizationfordoublescatteringprotondeliverytechniqueusinganeclipseapplicationprogramminginterfaceandconvolutionalneuralnetwork
AT ahnsanghee beamangleoptimizationfordoublescatteringprotondeliverytechniqueusinganeclipseapplicationprogramminginterfaceandconvolutionalneuralnetwork
AT jeongseonghoon beamangleoptimizationfordoublescatteringprotondeliverytechniqueusinganeclipseapplicationprogramminginterfaceandconvolutionalneuralnetwork
AT leesebyeong beamangleoptimizationfordoublescatteringprotondeliverytechniqueusinganeclipseapplicationprogramminginterfaceandconvolutionalneuralnetwork
AT shindongho beamangleoptimizationfordoublescatteringprotondeliverytechniqueusinganeclipseapplicationprogramminginterfaceandconvolutionalneuralnetwork
AT limyoungkyung beamangleoptimizationfordoublescatteringprotondeliverytechniqueusinganeclipseapplicationprogramminginterfaceandconvolutionalneuralnetwork
AT jeongjonghwi beamangleoptimizationfordoublescatteringprotondeliverytechniqueusinganeclipseapplicationprogramminginterfaceandconvolutionalneuralnetwork
AT younsanghee beamangleoptimizationfordoublescatteringprotondeliverytechniqueusinganeclipseapplicationprogramminginterfaceandconvolutionalneuralnetwork
AT leesunguk beamangleoptimizationfordoublescatteringprotondeliverytechniqueusinganeclipseapplicationprogramminginterfaceandconvolutionalneuralnetwork
AT moonsungho beamangleoptimizationfordoublescatteringprotondeliverytechniqueusinganeclipseapplicationprogramminginterfaceandconvolutionalneuralnetwork
AT kimtaehyun beamangleoptimizationfordoublescatteringprotondeliverytechniqueusinganeclipseapplicationprogramminginterfaceandconvolutionalneuralnetwork
AT kimhaksoo beamangleoptimizationfordoublescatteringprotondeliverytechniqueusinganeclipseapplicationprogramminginterfaceandconvolutionalneuralnetwork